On Wednesday 12 November 2003 02:38 am, Niklas Bergh wrote:
| I'm not seeing this but now that the world seems to have discovered my
|
| node,
|
| my JVM keeps dying with out-of-memory and NULL pointer exceptions. I
|
| still
|
| have plenty of (virtual) memory left, so something else must
I'm not seeing this but now that the world seems to have discovered my
node,
my JVM keeps dying with out-of-memory and NULL pointer exceptions. I
still
have plenty of (virtual) memory left, so something else must be serving as
a
cap on the memory that java can get.
This might be a java
I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads 100%; in fact, the load
numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
universal.
On Monday 10 November 2003 11:16 pm, Damian Gerow wrote:
|
Thus spake The Babbler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06:24:30 11/11/03:
: I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
:
: Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads 100%; in fact, the load
: numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
:
Thus spake The Babbler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06:24:30 11/11/03:
: I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
:
: Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads 100%; in fact, the load
: numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
:
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16:34:02 11/11/03:
: Anyone running under 5-CURRENT? It's good to see that it's working for
: someone, just wondering if perhaps all the threading changes have made
: a difference.
:
: Or maybe my node is just overloaded...
:
: if you've got only
I've been noticing some accessibility problems with my freenet install
over the past couple of weeks. Figuring that it was just a fresh node,
and I'd done a number of restarts, I didn't bother looking into it. But
sometime yesterday, since I'd been up for almost five days, I poked a bit
further
