"given win98se and being forced to run with only
64mb ram on a p233what would you recommend?"
Not running a node?
Well, I think the 1.5 jmv is less heavy on HD and
RAM then the 1.4.2. So, if you really want to go through with it, you either
keep the 1.4.1 or go to the 1.5 JVM, that's my
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freenetsup Maillist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/9/2004 2:52:27 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] which jvm?
Remailer operator, as freenet node owner, works
for free and pay for it.
Let them have some fun .
Never seen
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/8/2004 6:46:26 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] which jvm?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although if you do get
Won't help me if the explanation is in Italian.
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freenetsup Maillist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/9/2004 2:52:27 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] which jvm?
Remailer operator, as freenet node owner, works
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 20:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although if you do get it to work, futureworlds, let us know, please.
Er ... futureworlds is a Mixmaster anonymous remailer dummy
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although if you do get it to work, futureworlds, let us know, please.
Er ... futureworlds is a Mixmaster anonymous remailer dummy address.
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:16 pm, futureworlds wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Newsbyte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that would depend on whome you ask, it seems (see discussion on
devl).
*I* would suggest 1.5.
But actually, there are no real big problems with 1.4.1, though
I currently have:
Java 2 Runtime Environement, Standard Edition 1.4.1_03
Would I be better off getting:
J2SE v 1.4.2_05 JRE
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=22PartDetailId=j2r
e-1.4.2_05-oth-JPRSiteId=JSCTransactionId=noreg
thanks
Quoting futureworlds [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I currently have:
Java 2 Runtime Environement, Standard Edition 1.4.1_03
Would I be better off getting:
What operating system are you running?
-todd
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:16 pm, futureworlds wrote:
given win98se and being forced to run with only 64mb ram on a p233
Not much you can do except run Freenet on at least NT4 or Win2K.
Well, that would depend on whome you ask, it seems (see discussion on devl).
*I* would suggest 1.5.
But actually, there are no real big problems with 1.4.1, though there WERE
problems reported with the 1.4.2 on OSX, BSD and Linux.
___
Support mailing
Quoting Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:16 pm, futureworlds wrote:
given win98se and being forced to run with only 64mb ram on a p233
Not much you can do except run Freenet on at least NT4 or Win2K. Win98
cannot handle an application like Freenet, and you might
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:06:25PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:16 pm, futureworlds wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Newsbyte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that would depend on whome you ask, it seems (see discussion on
devl).
*I* would suggest 1.5.
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although if you do get it to work, futureworlds, let us know, please.
Er ... futureworlds is a Mixmaster anonymous remailer dummy address.
Ah, I see. This issue has come up before with
14 matches
Mail list logo
