Re: [freenet-support] Why are you telline ME this???

2015-01-19 Thread Bert Massop
As you might already have understood, Freenet will continue to function perfectly fine if the computer is restarted during datastore maintenance. We do however advise users to avoid restarting Freenet while the maintenance is in progress, as Freenet would have to do all the work all over again on

Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!

2010-11-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote: Hello support! I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS and cannot send messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry 0

Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!

2010-11-25 Thread Guillaume LEROY
+ CC: sesef...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!! On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote: Hello support! I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards

Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!

2010-11-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
@freenetproject.org Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:38:03 + CC: sesef...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!! On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote: Hello support! I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID

Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!

2010-11-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:45:30 +, Guillaume LEROY wrote: Hello support! I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS and cannot send messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry 0 messages

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer parallel to my normal desktop computer

2010-08-04 Thread user1
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:04:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 25 July 2010 21:49:43 user1 wrote: Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay. I have found out, that when I close all my running programs on my desktop machine, and disconnect the freenet server,

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer parallel to my normal desktop computer

2010-07-28 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 25 July 2010 21:49:43 user1 wrote: Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay. I just checked the speed of my desktop machine when the freenet machine is running at the same time. Speed of desktop machine: Download speed= 1904 Kbps Upload speed = 167

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer parallel to my normal desktop computer

2010-07-25 Thread user1
Then I removed the freenet fit-pc, and now skype works well again. Any suggestions, possible a set-up I can do on freenet, so freenet does not disturb my ordinary internet system. With my desktop machine running alone speedtest.net showed: Download 2.06 Mbps Upload 0.45 Mbps Freenet fit-pc

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer parallel to my normal desktop computer

2010-07-25 Thread user1
Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay. I just checked the speed of my desktop machine when the freenet machine is running at the same time. Speed of desktop machine: Download speed= 1904 Kbps Upload speed = 167 Kbps ___

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer paral

2010-07-25 Thread urza9814
Not sure why adding the router would change it(I'm not sure exactly what you setup is/was,) but I would add an input bandwidth limit. Note that the freenet limit uses bytes, while your speed is measured in bits. So your speed, 450kbps, is 56KB/s. I'd set the input limit to 20. Even if all

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-03-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and My main complain is, that is not

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread VolodyA! V Anarhist
bqz69 wrote: I was just wondering? I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet. It can be used mostly only by small

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and *done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard first :P. In Window$, I assume, you

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread bqz69
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and My main complain is, that is not possible to use Freenet anonymously for individual

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote: The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream. What you are dreaming of is an entire

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-26 Thread CyberLeo
bqz69 wrote: I was just wondering? snip I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a possibly enduser of Freenet. I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or three volunteer

Re: [freenet-support] Why does it take longer to start

2007-11-04 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Level 13 wrote: A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to 90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up (that is, until the

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the preferred download. http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html Until Freenet 0.7

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

2006-07-29 Thread Anonymous Freenet User
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Disposition: inline --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type:

Re: [freenet-support] Why did you set up a subcription for me and continue billing me?

2005-03-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:48:24AM -0800, A. Censor wrote: Approximately Jan 29th I tried to make a ONE time $10 contribution to freenet to support what you guys do. Thank you. That contribution went through. However what troubles me is that you guys then appeared to continue to try to

Re: [freenet-support] Why Freenet doesn't try any nodes?

2004-07-23 Thread Toad
Because all the nodes are backed off. If you upgrade to 5085 this will be clearer. On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:36:08PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote: I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is

RE: [freenet-support] Why?

2004-05-30 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Apparently something happened on that attempted download of new version. I'm back in transient mode. I presume something ran even though nothing seemed to be downloaded that was later than 5082. [Original Message] From: Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 5/30/2004

Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection?

2003-11-03 Thread Dave Hooper
No worries, I've seen stubbier questions. Your .ini looks fine to me - how do you know Freenet cannot connect to the internet? When I start freenet, freenet is not able to connect to the Internet. What exactly do you mean by that? How do you know freenet is not able to connect to the Internet?

Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection?

2003-11-03 Thread Nicholas Sturm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 11/3/2003 3:42:05 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection? No worries, I've seen stubbier questions. Your .ini looks fine to me - how do you know Freenet cannot connect to the internet? When I start freenet, freenet

Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection?

2003-11-03 Thread Toad
# The IP address of this node as seen by the public Internet. You only need to override this if it cannot be autodetected, for example if you have a NAT (a.k.a. IP Masquerading) firewall/router, in which case you will need to set it to the IP address or DNS name of the internet-side

Re: [freenet-support] Why would my node to this?

2003-02-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote: Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore, QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtnodes_14166a Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore, QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtprops_14166b

Re: [freenet-support] Why would my node to this?

2003-02-07 Thread Niklas Bergh
Now you are jesting with me Matthew. But what it is actually doing is writing out the routing table. The real question was why are the files stored in 'c:\'? I haven't told my node to put anything there as far as I know. If I happened to run linux would the files be placed in '/'? /N

Re: [freenet-support] Why isn't audio/mpeg a standard fproxy mime type?

2002-12-17 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] It really irritating to keep being asked if I really want to download that mp3. You can add it yourself you know. :) I don't know the real reason, but if someone is using wmp (windows media player) to play their audio it will guess the

Re: [freenet-support] Why isn't audio/mpeg a standard fproxy mime type?

2002-12-17 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:22:25PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote: - Original Message - From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] It really irritating to keep being asked if I really want to download that mp3. You can add it yourself you know. :) I don't know the real reason, but if someone