[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 16 14:05:35 2004 wrote in an attachment:
> > It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
> > top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
> > that, I see that it is using 79 MB of memory. The number doesn't appear
>
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:37:16PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Niklas Bergh wrote:
>
> > > It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
> > > top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
> > > that, I see that it is using 79
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:00:36PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
>
> > > Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
> > > Freenet code contains a bug (a so called "memory leak") which takes
> > > memory from your OS, but then "forg
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
> > top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
> > that, I see that it is using 79 MB of memory. The number doesn't appear
> > to grow -- there is no
> It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
> top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
> that, I see that it is using 79 MB of memory. The number doesn't appear
> to grow -- there is no evidence of a memory leak -- but it starts out and
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> > Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
> > Freenet code contains a bug (a so called "memory leak") which takes
> > memory from your OS, but then "forgets" about it, not using it and
> > not returning it - so the amount
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > Is it a VM bug or is it just creating
> > objects it theoretically could reach (thus they don't get GC'd), but
> > ignores forever?
>
> The second it what is defined as a 'memory leak' in GC'd environments.
Or a "space leak".
>
> Is it a VM bug or is it just creating
> objects it theoretically could reach (thus they don't get GC'd), but
> ignores forever?
The second it what is defined as a 'memory leak' in GC'd environments.
/N
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On 13 Feb 2004 at 15:29, Victor Denisov wrote:
> Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
> Freenet code contains a bug (a so called "memory leak") which takes
> memory from your OS, but then "forgets" about it, not using it and
> not returning it - so the amount of
Regards,
Victor Denisov,CEO, Jera Systems, Moscow,
Russia
- Original Message -
From:
Robert
Greenage
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:15
PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] routing
table
I want to free up RAM memory. I only have 192 mbs. I
5:09:02 AM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] routing table
The routingtable files are the rtnodes_* and rtprops_* files in your choosen freenet install folder. However.. these files occupies only a few kilobytes of your harddrive.
Is it HD space or RAM memory you want to free up?
/N
-Ori
Title: Message
The
routingtable files are the rtnodes_* and rtprops_* files in your
choosen freenet install folder. However.. these files occupies
only a few kilobytes of your harddrive.
Is it HD
space or RAM memory you want to free up?
/N
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 04:33:17PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me the difference in success rates in contacting a
> given set of nodes for a transient node from that achieved by a
> permanent node? I have a permanent node which has managed to contact a
> group of seed nod
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:19:22AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Build Number 624
>
> >>
> 29.11.2002 23:37:58 (freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$NWalk, main): Exhausted supply
>of files29.11.2002 23:37:58 (freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory, main):
> starting with D:\_freenet\store (8589934592
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Wooledge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Roger Hayter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a permanent node which has managed to contact a
group of seed nodes about 500 times after 13 trials.
I would imagine something is wrong with your computer, firewall,
netw
Roger Hayter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a permanent node which has managed to contact a
> group of seed nodes about 500 times after 13 trials.
I would imagine something is wrong with your computer, firewall,
network, Java VM, freenet.conf, etc. Here's what I've got on a
non-transie
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:07:59AM +1300, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> Greetings. This morning I found a message Routing Table corrupt. Remote RT files and
>restart.
They are called rtnodes_ and rtprops_. The
corruption is usually caused by a JVM bug - which JVM are you using?
1.3.1?
>
> I'm new - on
17 matches
Mail list logo
