Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-25 Thread folkert
What about that the freenet daemon periodically (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and speed up distribution of data. There is a plugin: MDNSDiscovery. This uses it to announce FCP,

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 18 Feb 2011 19:40:59 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote: What about that the freenet daemon periodically (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 18 Feb 2011 19:40:59 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote: What about that the freenet daemon periodically (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 19 Feb 2011 19:24:30 Edzard Pasma wrote: Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven: Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to what you can browse.

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-19 Thread folkert
Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start talking about installing filters. This is why you /don't/ want any kind of

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote: What about that the freenet daemon periodically (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and speed up distribution of data. Data distribution on

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-18 Thread folkert
True, but it can be used to find a way to other nodes further down the path. This way one doesn't need to connect to the central seednodes to find ways to reach the global network/the rest of the freenet network. Ah, for initial connection to Freenet that might be useful, although I

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-18 Thread folkert
Normal people (your neighbour so to say) start to know these things like FreeNet/Tor. This week there was an item on national television in the Netherlands about how Tor helps oppressed people to get their opinions/news items/etc. out! Oh it was also a rather positive news item.

Re: [freenet-support] idea

2011-02-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:35:00 +0100, folkert wrote: Well I was thinking maybe in the future we're all using mesh networking over wifi (or whatever wireless protocol we then have). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_networking Freenet-Darknet should work wonderfully over such a network :). (Well,

Re: [freenet-support] idea for wininstaller

2002-11-04 Thread murray
I tryed windinstaller but it gave me a warning that with explorer its dangerous so I uninstall. THank You - Original Message - From: Mathew Ryden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] idea for wininstaller

Re: [freenet-support] idea for wininstaller

2002-11-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
Zlatin Balevsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: since Fred still takes up to 20 or 30 seconds to load on slower machine, You have some really WEIRD notions of what constitutes a slower machine. If your node only takes 20 seconds to start up, you've got a pretty fast machine, or a very small data