My node uses about 30% of available CPU and less than 10% of available
bandwidth. Here are my freenet.conf bandwidth limits:
bandwidthLimit=1048576 (this line should be ignored, right?)
inputBandwidthLimit=1048576
outputBandwidthLimit=1048576
This is for a 10BaseT full-duplex
Mp3sa yine bir ilki gerçekleþtiriyor: Klip arþivi!
Full albüm ve single parçalar mp3 halinde!
Arayýpta bulamadýðýnýz bütün parçalar için birde sitemize bakýn: http://www.mp3sa.com
Full Turkçe Album
Full Yabancý Album
A-Z Yerli Mp3
A-Z Yabancý Mp3
En Iyý 20
Yerli Výdeo Klýp
Yabancý
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:22:00AM -0600, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
My node uses about 30% of available CPU and less than 10% of available
bandwidth. Here are my freenet.conf bandwidth limits:
bandwidthLimit=1048576 (this line should be ignored, right?)
inputBandwidthLimit=1048576
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 03:27:54PM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote:
Greetings,
534 seems to be running just great. For me there's just one remaining problem, which
is that I still don't seem
to be able to get bandwidth under control.
I have things pinched off to 10K up and down, on the
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:03:54AM -0600, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
Two things:
1) last night my dedicated Freenet node (which seems to still be running
fine) printed to the shell that spawned it:
PANIC! Just recreated heisenbug! ID: 7a0e982c7a0e982c
As long as you don't get more of these,
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:03:36AM -0600, Robert Carroll wrote:
Great job, freenet is getting much better. However, fproxy access for non localhost
addresses is still slow if you are running a busy permanent node.
Non-localhost addresses? LAN addresses, you mean, e.g.
10.x.x.x
192.168.x.x
etc?
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi there. i upgraded freenet's .jar files to the most recent snapshot, like i've
done a dozen times before.
but this time i stumbled into a error after i started bunnyapp. the trayicon shows
up, then blinks after a while,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 07:33:52PM +0100, j. wrote:
Hello
i have the freenet internet web interface running
But what next?
if i click on request freesite by URI
i get meggage as below:
also GPL does not work
What i do wrong?
help files are not complete
help please
mail to
[EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:27:17AM -, Vitenka - Zen wrote:
Well, my rt files haven't exploded this time - but the databugs seem to be slowly
munching through
my list of known nodes.
Are there really only 16 nodes?
And do we have to remove them (nodes we discard for whatever reason)
rm ls*, then rm rt* in the freenet directory. Then start Freenet.
--
-
The Numeric Python EM Project
www.pythonemproject.com
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:28:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Builds 528 and 604 have this mod, are in CVS and snapshots. Will get
0.5.0.4 out ASAP Thursday with this change and maybe a few others.
why are there still 2 different freds... what's the difference between them? new
users of
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:43:35AM -, Vitenka - Zen wrote:
No reply at htl 15.
Trying htl 40 Not found.
But no one can see me either.
Is it posisble that the network has just gotten so
big (and full of holes) that an insert of 5 and a
request of 40 simply don't reach far
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:58:00PM -0400, Doug Bostrom wrote:
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:55 pm, you wrote:
Use the bandwidth limiter to prevent it swamping your connection. It is
expected to use lots (up to 120) threads - they should normally be
almost all idling. The current
I tried adding publicNode and I couldn't see any difference. The node is
running under windows XP. Both computers have valid internet addresses.
Both computers are on the same subnet. The node is configured to allow all
IP addresses mainport access, however my firewall only permits the two
Shawn Yarbrough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My node uses about 30% of available CPU and less than 10% of available
bandwidth. Here are my freenet.conf bandwidth limits:
bandwidthLimit=1048576 (this line should be ignored, right?)
inputBandwidthLimit=1048576
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:28:18PM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
At 07.01 29/10/02 -0500, you wrote:
Currently rel-0-5-1 has it
[...]
A word of warning to people who may try this: port 8889 is GONE. The
node status stuff has been merged into port .
What about distribution port
Shawn Yarbrough ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Unfortunantly raising maximumThreads to 200 or above makes
my system unable to fork so I had to reboot. Now it is set at 150.
You may need to recompile your kernel to allow more processes.
Unfortunately you didn't say what operating system you're
11/13/02 4:42:36 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have things pinched off to 10K up and down, on the premise that since we're on
ADSL here I can't
allow more
That's the combined limit or the individual limits?
Individual.
I use 20k down, 5k up, on a 512/128 cable modem (I have
18 matches
Mail list logo
