Re: [freenet-support] starting probs
Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 15:50 schrieb rensinghoff: Thank you soo much for your help.. I LOVE OPEN SOURCE PEOPLE !!! another free hint: you posted your user-id along with your password. you should now change the password as soon as possible :-) good byte pgpdmkaNh1pAY.pgp Description: signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:31:23PM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote: | | Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node | responds in a reasonable time nowadays... of course if your browser is | set to only use 2 connections it might take a while... My browser is set to a bit more, but it still takes at least a few minutes to get an error. I think the error is usually either data not found or (more likely) key not found. These are from the default bookmarks -- things like FIND. Expect fewer 'I thinks' in my complaints when I actually have a node running again. || How much RAM does it have? We have had reports of reasonable performance | |256 megs, but it's also running a lot of stuff -- |apache,squid,qmail,djbdns,dhcpd,samba,sshd,bincimap,stunnel | |Admittedly, there's not a lot of load on it, and a lot of that could be |swapped. But I'm running Linux 2.6, and Top shows 99% CPU in userland, |by Freenet -- not in IO-Wait, where it would be if RAM was an issue. | | How long after startup? I'd expect a CPU spike for the first hour or | two... it should go away after that... but is this on a 200MHz system? It is a 200 mhz system, but I usually don't leave Freenet running for very long. Like, I'll run it for an hour in the evening while I try to get content (and browse other sites while I'm bored of waiting), and then I'll shut it down for the night so my brother can game (he wakes up earlier than me). Okay, you'll never get acceptable performance. Tough. Not much we can do about it. Well, maybe it'll improve with some future changes... | That's not been everyone else's experience :). Seriously, it's not a | matter of local node optimisation. It's a matter of optimising THE | NETWORK. That means getting routing working. Ah, I see. Still, they are sort of co-dependent. If a node has a massive spike in CPU usage for the first hour, it hurts the network. If the network is slow, it doesn't matter much how fast the local node is. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] The hang on lost Internet
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:48:41PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Todd, now that you're back with us: Obviously going into the 100% state after loosing a connection does nothing beneficial for the network. If I kill my note each evening in anticipation of the death and then reactivate it when I regain rationality the next day will this on-n-off activity of my node be of any value either to itself or to the network? Recall, I have dial up which is not great, but that I was getting integration until about two weeks ago, is running of any benefit at all? Thanks. Nick Sure, if it runs for 4 hours + it's probably useful... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] build 60148 looks for Source fields in _all_ messages?
I'm getting loads of these: 13.7.2004 15:10:48 (freenet.HighLevelMessageFactory, Network reading thread, ERROR): Caught freenet.InvalidMessageException: Can't find Source field on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: 220.213.17.254:27154local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7)], sock=[Socket[addr=/220.213.17.254,port=27154,localport=13462]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/82.181.27.153:13462 remote=/220.213.17.254:27154]], peer=[Peer [DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7) @ 220.213.17.254:27154 (1/3)]], utbound=[false]] trying to parse FNP message: DataRequest RequestInterval=32560.675246668114 HopsToLive=4 UniqueID=1b45916c74789aa1 SearchKey=830c27445ac9a47544d1c889505dfea4a412a27b140302 EndMessage freenet.InvalidMessageException: Can't find Source field on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: 220.213.17.254:27154local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7)], sock=[Socket[addr=/220.213.17.254,port=27154,localport=13462]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/82.181.27.153:13462 remote=/220.213.17.254:27154]], peer=[Peer [DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7) @ 220.213.17.254:27154 (1/3)]], utbound=[false]] at freenet.message.Request.init(Request.java:57) at freenet.message.DataRequest.init(DataRequest.java:36) at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor5.newInstance(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:415) at freenet.MessageHandler.getMessageFor(MessageHandler.java:110) at freenet.HighLevelMessageFactory.create(HighLevelMessageFactory.java:52) at freenet.PeerPacketMessageParser.parse(PeerPacketMessageParser.java:48) at freenet.PeerPacketParser.processMessage(PeerPacketParser.java:268) at freenet.PeerPacketParser.process(PeerPacketParser.java:201) at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.process(MuxConnectionHandler.java:462) at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.processConnections(ReadSelectorLoop.java:491) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:836) at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.run(ReadSelectorLoop.java:544) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:566) 13.7.2004 15:10:48 (freenet.PeerPacketMessageParser, Network reading thread, NORMAL): Recognized type 1 but parse returned null for message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: 220.213.17.254:27154local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7)], sock=[Socket[addr=/220.213.17.254,port=27154,localport=13462]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/82.181.27.153:13462 remote=/220.213.17.254:27154]], peer=[Peer [DSA(b9e8 a6dc 61ce 69ea e0b9 dece 27fd 3492 c2ca e8a7) @ 220.213.17.254:27154 (1/3)]], utbound=[false]] of length 154 -- Mika Hirvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
