Re: [freenet-support] cant install freenet
On Saturday 14 Jul 2012 03:16:59 arc shine wrote: hi I didnt get a reply or see my query posted below or see any answers to it. I only just checked recently and it said there was a 3 day expiration problem so I may have missed something.Apologies. Can you post again or reply? Sorry... it sounds like the virus checker broke the install? Can you try reinstalling now that you've told the virus checker that it's okay? Thanks On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:31 PM, arc shine arcshine2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I tried the media email but as Im mainly having technical problems installing getting freenet to work, I was advised by Ian to use this email instead. I am looking to do an independent review/experience of freenet in a blog, however Ive tried to install it but its failed. Ive tried it recently on a windows 7 system which didnt work (I thought possibly because of kaspersky and windows 7 64 bit) and also today tried it on vista a 32bit system with webroot essentials and with firefox private browsing permanently checked. Firstly after installing it my security package webroot essentials picked it up as a suspect program and put in quarantine. I later restored the 3 freenet programs/app which were in there,and tried start freenet and open freenet, but I got 'searching for freenet.exe or browse for it' and then I tried to run the correct freenet file in the folder but I got java virtual machine launcher and 'a java exception has occurred'. I tried two others I thought might be correct but it still didnt work. I then tried the 127.0.0.1: instructions and firefox couldnt find anything and that didnt work either. No system tray icon has appeared (or rabbit icon applet) either. I just wanted to see what this is all about (I heard about it on an talk radio station) and then get the hell out if I dont like the look of it, but it looks like its going to be difficult to get it to work/run at all. Can you help/advise me here as to what Im doing wrong or as to why this isnt installing or running properly?. Im not an advanced computer user (maybe intermediate just about) Thanks Jon signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Error
On Tuesday 03 Jul 2012 15:05:32 ITALO AYALA wrote: Good morning... I've been experiencing the same errors more than once and would like to know how to solve it. Every time I try to start Freenet, pops a text window saying: Freenet Launcher was unable to the Freenet node at port . And, now and then, pops another one with this text: The Freenet Launcher terminated unexpectedly. Looking forward to solve it. Thank you. If you could post your wrapper.log that might be helpful (in the wrapper\ folder in the folder freenet was installed to). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] filesize mistake
On Thursday 28 Jun 2012 18:34:36 Angle Fire wrote: Hello, on https://freenetproject.org/download.html it says Download and run the installer (8MB), which I did. I was surprised to see that the installer actually is 12.5 MB. Not very good to make me trust your .exe, honestly :( I suggest you update this text and also include at least an MD5 checksum to increase trust. I have removed the (8MB). There is a gpg signature and all the links are using SSL. One thing we don't say on the website is if you don't trust google, you can get it from us directly: https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/FreenetInstaller-1409.exe https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/FreenetInstaller-1409.exe.sig Of course then you'd have to either trust our SSL cert (bad idea) or find a gpg trust path to my pubkey (hard!). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Can't access Freenet
On Monday 25 Jun 2012 02:37:18 Rod MacDow wrote: Hi, I've been on Freenet for over a year with no significant problems. For the last month, every time I try to access (Build 1407) it gets to one or two nodes, then after several minutes, goes to zero nodes and stays there. I've tried reinstalling on the same disk, different disk, with the same results. Is this behaviour new with build 1407? I'm on Windows 7 and the system configuration has not changed from when it was working. Any guidance would be much appreciated. This is very odd. First: - Post your wrapper.log. You might want to look for anything incriminating (e.g. look for @ to find keys), and/or send it to me directly. - Go to the Messages page and click on Switch to advanced mode. Copy what it says on the announcing alert. Is it managing to connect to any seednodes? Is it even trying to connect to them? Thanks. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] freenet error
On Sunday 17 Jun 2012 22:36:29 Ben Adetunji wrote: hi, i started using freenet a few days ago when suddenly i received this error message on the main page: This node has to wait too long for available bandwidth (944452ms 1ms). Increase your output bandwidth limit and/or remove some peers to improve the situation. after receiving this message i was unable to access both freenet and frost services. could you please tell me what im doing wrong and what i can do to fix this issue? i am currently using open net because i dont know anybody. Ewww. The most likely reason for this is severe network congestion caused by e.g. other users of the connection, QoS etc, or very heavy CPU usage (check Task Manager). Are either of these true? Are you still getting this problem? Sorry for it taking so long to deal with this ... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Tray/ Freenet will not connect to server
On Wednesday 06 Jun 2012 17:49:45 Marques Brown wrote: Hello, I have freenet installed on an encrypted hard drive and had moved all components to the drive including the freenet tray app. I tried starting freenet with my freenet tray and it will not connect. When I right click the icon and select start freenet it does nothing. When I select open web interface it gives me the message that the browser cannot connect to the freenet server. I had previously kept a copy of the freenet tray on my computer but have deleted it since, could this be my problem? I tried moving the tray back to my computer and starting it from there with no luck. It worked just yesterday, so I'm really confused. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. If the path to the install has changed it's going to be easiest to reinstall it to the new path. Sorry. Also this means you may have to start Freenet manually, if you don't start the truecrypt container on boot-up. Thank you signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet software won't connect anymore
On Monday 28 May 2012 03:08:08 John Doe wrote: In my last email to you, I told you that the Freenet software on my computer disconnected after only a few minutes of usage and wouldn't reconnect unless and until I restarted my computer, and asked for advice. Now my Freenet software won't start or connect at all. My OS is the latest version of Ubuntu. I'm trying to use Freenet for Linux. There's no start icon for Freenet on my desktop. What should I do? It should start on startup. You can manually start it by opening a terminal, and doing: cd Freenet ./run.sh start However, it sounds like it's broken. You could send me your wrapper.log (in /home/my username/Freenet/wrapper/wrapper.log) to try to understand the problem. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'I tried to make an e-mail id through…'
On Thursday 24 May 2012 06:40:32 no-re...@freenet.uservoice.com wrote: [http://freenet.uservoice.com] freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report ausaf.a...@yahoo.com sent a message from https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2Ffreemail.html [https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2Ffreemail.html] I tried to make an e-mail id through freemail. But when I entered the command java -jar Freemail.jar-1337836282045 in cmd after changing my password it gives an error stating :-ERROR(freemail.fcp.HighLevelFCPClient): Slot insert failed, error code is 8. Chrome 19.0.1084.46 (Windows 7) [http://www.uservoice.com] You shouldn't need to run Freemail directly with java -jar. You should be able to just visit it from the Plugins page on Freenet, and create an identity there IIRC. Also there is a major update for Freemail pending, it should be in a new freenet release in a week or two. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] freeware and java
On Monday 21 May 2012 05:04:43 ricardo flores magon wrote: howdy i tried to install freenet and it said the java i have was outdated i used the insaller then it told me to refresh the webpage when there was not one,then i used the offline java download and nothing happend.peas halp. I assume you are using 64-bit Windows? Unfortunately the current Freenet on Windows uses only the 32-bit version of Java. So you need to install the latest 32-bit Java 1.6. you guys are going a great job Thanks! Sorry it took so long to get to you. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Confused newbie.
On Friday 18 May 2012 21:12:14 John Wyman wrote: Hello - I just ran the installer for freenet and I now have “freenet” on my list of programs. When I click on “freenet”, it takes me to a page named “freenet.jar-Bitzipper” and a long list of files. What do I do next? That is very odd. Are you sure you actually installed Freenet? It should be installed in e.g. C:\Program Files (x86)\Freenet ... There should be a menu folder, and within that items called Start Freenet or Open Freenet. Also in your system tray (bottom right hand of the screen, you may have to click on it to expand to see all the tiny icons), there should be an icon that looks like a rabbit... It sounds like some unzipping software may have interfered with the install somehow ... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] frequent disconnections with linux freenet
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 05:22:37 John Doe wrote: I've been using Freenet for Linux on an Ubuntu OS. Here's a problem I've had for several days now. Freenet disconnects after only a few minutes of usage and won't reconnect unless and until I restart my computer and OS. I've already forwarded the ports and configured my firewall to allow connections to Freenet, but the problem persisted. I haven't checked or used Freenet for a couple of days now. Has the network been having problems with connectivity? No, well, bootstrapping is slow, but it should work eventually. Is Freenet still installed? What version is it running? (Bottom of the homepage, http://127.0.0.1:/ ). If it's still disconnecting quickly, please wait for it to disconnect and then go to the Messages page, and click on the link at the bottom for advanced mode. Paste all the text on the page - I want to see whether it is announcing to the network. Also, please send me your wrapper.log. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] frequent disconnections with linux freenet
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 05:22:37 John Doe wrote: I've been using Freenet for Linux on an Ubuntu OS. Here's a problem I've had for several days now. Freenet disconnects after only a few minutes of usage and won't reconnect unless and until I restart my computer and OS. I've already forwarded the ports and configured my firewall to allow connections to Freenet, but the problem persisted. I haven't checked or used Freenet for a couple of days now. Has the network been having problems with connectivity? Also, have you changed any settings? E.g. Assume the port is not forwarded. on the core settings? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Problem with open Freenet
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 18:29:19 Rafał Cieloch wrote: Hey when i want to open Freenet after instalation i have comunnicate: The freenet wrapper terminated unexpectedly Freenet launcher was unable to connect to the Freenet node at port You can help me what is going ? The log suggests that Freenet is working. Have you tried just opening http://127.0.0.1:/ in a web browser? If it doesn't work, please send an up to date copy of the last part (200 lines or so) of your wrapper.log. Thanks. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] update.sh fails
On Monday 30 Apr 2012 06:03:04 Austin wrote: Since Freenet auto-updated itself to 1407, I can't get it to start up. Decided to try update.sh, but that fails too - there seems to be a problem with certificates that have expired just a few days ago. I believe the cert update problem is fixed. Have you tried it recently? If Freenet fails to start, can you please post your wrapper.log? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Changing browsers
On Thursday 19 Apr 2012 17:08:13 Dave wrote: Been using Chrome. Have downloaded Mozilla Firefox and made it default, but Freenet keeps opening in Chrome. How do I change to Firefox ? Thanks Dave Currently the launcher chooses Chrome if both are installed. The reasons are related to reliability issues with launching privacy mode from the command line. However, you can open freenet manually, or even create a link to open it, with http://127.0.0.1:/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Can't find nodes .
On Sunday 08 Apr 2012 08:04:05 Vinayak Kesarwani wrote: I don't know any friend nodes on freenet and even after setting the security level to low I can't find any stranger nodes. Can you help me ? Did you manage to fix this? Freenet can take 10 minutes or so to get onto the network ... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Digital certificate issue: mismatched sha1 and md5 checksums
On Thursday 05 Apr 2012 12:52:41 Pleiade - security wrote: The digital signature of the Freenet 0.7.5. installer from checksums.freenetproject.org could not be verified. It is ostensibly signed by Matthew Toseland. The Fingerprints given in the certificate do not match the file, viz: On console: ***/Downloads/freenet.jnlp SHA1(/***l/Downloads/freenet.jnlp)= 57f92da76b5f29f3cbed6eb1acd46b32017a1e1f ***:~ *** /***l/Downloads/freenet.jnlp MD5 (/***/Downloads/freenet.jnlp) = 9b18c6e7199e8f85ad5a72ab85863cb6 My questions: 1. Is this an issue? 2. I am being a 'bit/lot' thick/paranoid? Is this still broken? I'm not sure I understand what it is that is broken - jnlp is just a text file pointing to other files, for example. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] unable to connect after new installation of freenet on a fit-pc and ubuntu 8.04
On Sunday 15 Apr 2012 14:05:05 user1 wrote: Right after update to 1407 my freenet stopped again and I had to restart it again and now it is running again. Below are some messages from my wrapper log after it stopped today 15 april. - and some older error messages when same happened some days ago Error messages when freenet fit-pc suddenly stops Update from 1406 to 1407 automatic worked fine. ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/08 07:35:41 | JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM. ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/08 07:35:41 | JVM did not exit on request, terminated STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/08 07:35:42 | JVM exited in response to signal SIGKILL (9). ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/08 07:35:42 | Unable to start a JVM STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/08 07:35:42 | -- Wrapper Stopped ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:05 | JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM. ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:06 | JVM did not exit on request, terminated INFO | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:06 | JVM exited on its own while waiting to kill the application. STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:06 | JVM exited in response to signal SIGKILL (9). STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:11 | Reloading Wrapper configuration... STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/14 12:59:11 | Launching a JVM... ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/15 13:02:42 | JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM. ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/15 13:02:43 | JVM did not exit on request, terminated STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/15 13:02:44 | JVM exited in response to signal SIGKILL (9). ERROR | wrapper | 2012/04/15 13:02:44 | Unable to start a JVM STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/15 13:02:44 | -- Wrapper Stopped STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/15 14:20:33 | -- Wrapper Started as Daemon STATUS | wrapper | 2012/04/15 14:20:33 | Launching a JVM... INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: Initializing... INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1 INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: 3.2.3. INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: not function correctly. This configuration has not been tested INFO | jvm 1| 2012/04/15 14:20:35 | WrapperManager: and is not supported. I suggest increasing wrapper.ping.timeout in wrapper.conf. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] seriouswarnings from win plus all antivir/spy prgrs
On Friday 30 Mar 2012 23:34:26 espen jørgensen wrote: Hello. Heard lots about u but my pc warns me strictly not to run the freenet download,and firefox etc do not support u,why is that? Because programming on Windows is hard. Most common scripting tools (for e.g. writing installers) get picked up as viruses even though they aren't, and unless you have relationships with all the antivirus companies ... Which takes time, and we haven't got around to it yet. What do you mean by firefox etc do not support u? Med vennlig hilsen,kind regards Espen Jorgen Please consider the enviroment before printing this e-mail signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] invalid security certificate?
On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 16:48:06 ecc wrote: Hi, When I try to connect to any of the subpages on your homepage, I get a securitywarning telling me that you have en invalid security certificate. Is it me being hacked, or your site having trouble? :) Best regards, ecc PS: Error messeage belov (from Firefox) -- Technical Details freenetproject.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.opendns.com , opendns.com (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain) Should be fixed now. Although I don't understand why it would give that particular error. Can you confirm that it is okay now? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet wrapper terminated unexpectedly
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 04:11:52 Shadow Smirk wrote: The Freenet wrapper terminated unexpectedly. Try reinstalling or contacting the developers. reinstalled Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 update 31 reinstalled Freenet same error I've attached the wrapper.log file (though it doesn't have much): STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | -- Wrapper Started as Console STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | Java Service Wrapper Community Edition 32-bit 3.3.5 STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | Copyright (C) 1999-2009 Tanuki Software, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | Launching a JVM... INFO | jvm 1| 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | Error occurred during initialization of VM INFO | jvm 1| 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object ERROR | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:24 | JVM exited while loading the application. STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:29 | Reloading Wrapper configuration... STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/29 20:08:29 | Launching a JVM... INFO | jvm 2| 2012/02/29 20:08:29 | Error occurred during initialization of VM INFO | jvm 2| 2012/02/29 20:08:29 | java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object Your Java is severely broken. I don't know how to fix it, it's Sun's problem. Sorry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet installer problem
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 14:23:11 Machiel Schippers wrote: Hi there, I keep getting an error when trying to install. Double click .exe and a dialogscreen mentions “ installation problem” “Freenet requires the Java runtime environment etc. etc” I did install it several times , but this message keeps on asking to install Java. There’s no way around this either go wih install or exit... really annoying. Any adviseor workaround? I use aDell XPS701X with windows 7 ultimate 64 bit. What is the problem with just letting it install Java? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] nat problem
On Monday 20 Feb 2012 06:10:02 - - wrote: Instructions on setting up port forwarding are very unclear. (maybe this is why freenet growth is small) Unfortunately it is extremely difficult to write idiot proof instructions on setting up port forwarding given there are an awful lot of different routers. Fortunately most of the time UPnP handles this automatically, so most people don't need to bother. Also, Freenet will work to some degree without forwarding ports. There are multiple numbers for different ports in Freenet program. The FCP, Notification and the ini file seem to ALL show different values. Which is the port that needs forwarding exactly (please include protocol, direction, type) and TO WHAT ports on the Freenet machine? If you need to forward the ports then an alert will show up on the homepage including the exact ports. These vary from node to node so I can't tell you them but they will be UDP. Also I suggest you visit the Internet Connection page, it gives you this information at the top of the page. For example mine shows: * Darknet FNP: 24374/UDP (used to connect to trusted peers i.e. Friends; forward this port if you can) * Opennet FNP: 37024/UDP (used to connect to untrusted peers i.e. Strangers; forward this port if you can) * FProxy: /TCP (this web interface) * FCP: 9481/TCP (for Freenet clients such as Frost and Thaw) * TMCI: 2323/TCP (simple telnet-based command-line interface) You need to forward the first two ports. However you should not forward 24374 and 37024 because these are my UDP ports - they are chosen randomly and are different for you. These port numbers are (more or less) unique to your node so you should not mention them on anonymous forums on Freenet e.g. FMS. Do firewall rules on routers have to be changed in addition to the forwarding? (in this case, port of destination and source; ip address of source and destination are needed-including the direction. And does the direction change the meaning of source or destination ports?) No. Well it depends on the firewall rules I guess. Like I said, this stuff varies a lot. It's hard. Non-geek users should not have to deal with it. What we need, ideally, is for incoming packets on the 2 UDP ports to be forwarded to the computer running Freenet. UPnP will normally set this up, but it may not always work. Thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Problem with Freenet
On Thursday 16 Feb 2012 19:03:33 Mister Mundo wrote: I have a problem running with Freenet, when i try to start it, after a few seconds, i receive a message that says The Freenet wrapper terminated unexpectedly. I have looked the log, and it says: INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: Initializing... INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1 INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: 3.3.5. INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: not function correctly. This configuration has not been tested INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: and is not supported. INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager: INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager Error: Failed to connect to the Wrapper at port 32000 by binding to any ports in the range 31000 to 31999. Cause: java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind INFO | jvm 5| 2012/02/16 19:59:17 | WrapperManager Error: Exiting JVM... ERROR | wrapper | 2012/02/16 19:59:18 | JVM exited while loading the application. FATAL | wrapper | 2012/02/16 19:59:18 | There were 5 failed launches in a row, each lasting less than 300 seconds. Giving up. FATAL | wrapper | 2012/02/16 19:59:18 | There may be a configuration problem: please check the logs. STATUS | wrapper | 2012/02/16 19:59:18 | -- Wrapper Stopped What should I do?? Eeeek, that is bizarre. Sorry for it taking so long to get back to you - do you still have this problem? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Permission Request for 'The Freenet Project - faq...'
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 16:01:24 Albertio Ward wrote: Hello, I've known you website for ages, strictly speaking from year 2011. I found interesting your publication The Freenet Project - faq which I googled on http://www.freenetproject.org/faq.html ! I'd love to use it in a project I'm involved with called Bulgarian FCW Science, so I'm seeking your permission for translation to Bulgarian language. Bulgarian FCW Science is a freemium-model non-English language orientated startup with collection of scientific articles, personal notes etc. in several languages that is collaboratively edited by volunteers from around the world since 1999. Young and old, students and professors - even your neighbor could be a volunteer member. If you agree, we will credit you for your work in the resulting translation's references by stating that it was based on your work and is used with your permission, and by mentioning the name of my project Bulgarian FCW Science back to: http://www.freenetproject.org/faq.html Thank you for your time and patience. I look forward to your response next week. I'm sorry you didn't get a quick response, I guess this is obsolete now. I was rather busy and nobody else was dealing with the mailing lists. Your email likely got caught in a moderation queue because you weren't a subscriber. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet speed local threats
On Friday 09 Dec 2011 14:48:20 Volodya wrote: On 12/09/2011 02:26 PM, Chris wrote: I am looking into setting up a distribution where Tor or freenet is used to create a secure and anonymous environment for communicating. One of the issues with freenet is that it is slow. I haven't used it in many years and do understand it has gotten much better. I also am aware that after a few days it gets faster as popular data is retained and gets 'cached' on your node and nearby nodes based on what those around you are doing. What I'm trying to figure out is what happens when your node is not on 24/7 and you can only connect infrequently for several hours at a time. Many users have a persistent local threat that they need to be aware of. Leaving a server running is not an option as it could be compromised by an adversary. Removable media can reduce that threat. What I'm looking to find out is if you run a freenode from a removable media and then run a local server running freenode to use as one of your peers (which could be on all the time) does this post a threat? If no local server is run that you peer with how is the speed if you only connect every few days? Is running freenet for a few hours to several hours going to be sufficient or will it be unbearably slow? With Tor speeds are frequently severely limited. Especially with .onion nodes. Some non-onion servers can be accessed with significant speed though for sustained periods (15-300... maybe faster). The bigger problem with Freenet isn't really speed, it's the latency (i.e. how long it takes for the data to begin being actually downloaded after request or be uploaded after the insert starts). That part gets better if you are connected after some time. Also you didn't state if you are looking for anonymous publishing or anonymous downloading. If it's for publishing then Freenet will actually be better than Tor for you, since after the user goes offline the content doesn't disappear, and the adversary cannot determine the user simply by looking at patterns in the accessibility. However, if you are looking for something which will protect the user, who cannot run any software for a long period of time and wants to download the material right after going online, then perhaps something like Tor is better (at this time). Of course, what do i know? - Volodya The basic problem is if you have a persistent local threat, they will install a keylogger and know precisely what you are doing. If you're just worried about mum finding some naughty pictures and getting the wrong impression, there are various ways to deal with that. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet speed local threats
On Monday 12 Dec 2011 03:26:50 Chris wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:05:36 -0500, Chris wrote: How would you tell the difference between freenet becoming more popular, and the bad guys slowly infiltrating the opennet? Also, you assume they only have a few days to perform the attack -- how do you know most of the current nodes aren't them right now? You wouldn't know. But you can't exactly be targeted until you exist. Second. There are lots of adversaries. Not all of them are going to be targeting you. If the number of nodes is increasing it makes any one adversaries job all that much harder to target any one particular user. The Tor project has said such before. The more nodes that exist the harder certain attacks are to perform. Many of these attacks become apparent too if done too quickly. I'm not saying this would work for Freenet. I'm just saying it depends on the model and various factors. Freenet is very small. So it Tor. If every computer was distributed with Freenet or Tor many of these attacks would be much more difficult. Your node should have a choice as to who to connect with. If you have enough choice you will be unlikely to come across your adversary given a random selection of nodes. Tor has scalability issues. In principle Freenet should scale better than Tor does. Unfortunately bandwidth is very cheap in quantity. Computing hardware and geeks are cheap too. So even with a big network, it's likely that connecting to and surveilling every node is going to be feasible for a relatively small cost. And in fact a big network would be more likely to contain interesting targets - so is more likely to be surveilled than a small network. This is just the extreme end of opennet attacks though. There are many cheaper attacks, which are partially explained in the FAQ. The way to do this really is to monitor the data and figure out what the statistics are or have been over time and then base it off this information. If there is a change in those statistics it could indicate an attack. This is being done. But it won't help in this case at all. (Even if I wanted to dump thousands of bugged nodes into the network, I could simply post a Slashdot article, and join that upsurge.) You could. But then that upsurge would probably make it all the more difficult to perform the attack. For the record your idea of taking stats doesn't work. It doesn't work because nodes constantly go online and offline, so you need to constantly add more nodes - and many nodes do actually leave for good. It doesn't work because an attacker could perfectly well make his nodes behave in the predictable way you expect. And above all it doesn't work because routing on opennet is dependant on the path folding algorithm, which constantly changes the connections to optimise data retrieval. Simply choosing a fixed set of peers at install time does not work, especially not if the network is getting bigger. We do limit the rate of gaining new connections, but we can't limit it to be so slow as to affect an attacker in a big way. An attacker cannot directly connect to your node, he has to use path folding. But there are various attacks that make use of this. The simplest, and most expensive - connect to everyone - simply means he has to be a good node. More sophisticated, cheaper attacks rely on figuring out, with slowly increasingly precision, where a stream of requests are coming from. And yes we have many ideas on how to make these attacks much more difficult, especially for inserts (which generally are more valuable than requests). Are you reading what I'm writing? You have to organize first. If you haven't organized you can't get the people unbrainwashed. Any revolution takes MANY people. Debatable point in the light of recent events IMHO. You clearly would prefer to go out in the street and organize. Good luck not getting shot. My brothers and sisters and girlfriends and parents will come after me. When they get shot their relatives will come after. When they keep on shooting us we just get bigger. And if they still won't give in, and shoot us some more, the soldiers start defecting to our side, and we still win. I'm not saying you don't need organisers. Certainly inspiring voices are helpful, and keeping them safe is helpful. But look at what has been achieved with essentially traceable, public systems. IMHO Freenet has limited use in revolutions because the authorities will either turn off the internet completely or find some expensive technical way to block it which they can get the people to pay for. However, if it is popular, and allows people to communicate, it can be very useful, not least for helping people to hear voices they wouldn't be able to hear otherwise. China has shown it's willing to tolerate criminality as long as it doesn't include dissent - there is apparently state-licensed p2p software. This would never happen here ...
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet speed local threats
On Monday 12 Dec 2011 02:24:17 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:05:36 -0500, Chris wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:36:53 -0500, Chris wrote: It's not that they think it's hopelessly insecure. It really is :p. I mean, it might still be good enough -- but there are actual, well-known, unsolvable problems with the opennet idea. Which that FAQ should have explained :p. I'm not arguing it is or isn't. Everything is relative though. No, everything is not relative :P. Opennet *is* pretty easily exploitable by design. This isn't a problem with freenet in particular -- but of any untrustworthy network. (Opennet does actually have a minimal amount of trust in it -- via the seednodes. But it's easily exploitable. A darknet is the way to go. (The only reason why the opennet is still around is because people are lazy and complacent.)) It's a specific problem with not being a mixnet. Unfortunately mixnets are either not scalable or easily blocked or both. However IMHO Freenet can be useful even without being a mixnet. Nobody is saying you don't need public support (at least until you gain power). It's the first and main thing you need, before you decide to take any action. (Unless that action is supposed to persuade them -- which anything violent or controversial probably almost certainly won't.) Hmmm... when was this email written? ;) If the government is killing off or arresting the organizers then gaining popular support is difficult or impossible. Well, if they're organizing to get the revolution rolling, then of course that's an assured fail. If they're organizing to peacefully teach people, then yea, arresting those people will hamper things. This is where freenet might come in. What happened in practice is they posted to facebook pages (sometimes in their real name, sometimes Facebook turned a blind eye, but it is likely to crack down on it now outside of countries where it has no legal exposure and it is fashionable not to cooperate with the authorities), they got traced by the regime and executed, but then their families came out, along with the families of all the people kidnapped and shot by the government at demonstrations... What you really need in such a communication tool is *popularity*. The problem with Facebook is that you are at the whims of a corporation trying to make a profit, whose main asset is *your private information*. The problem with Freenet is even if we get it working well (and we're a long way off that), if it's popular the government will just block it by various rather expensive brute-force methods and bill the customers for the oppression. But generally, the more popular Freenet is, the more useful it is for political purposes. And yes, things like subversive blogs are important. Even in the west, where people get fired, prosecuted etc for blogging about work. The problem is that many people are going to be in great danger as they will be physically doing things that might get detected. People should not be doing things physically, before the philosophy is firmly entrenched in the minds of the people. If the people are still brainwashed, than any action you take will only make your position look worse. First you have to undo their brainwashing. Hence blogs etc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Verifying builds was Re: Freenet speed local threats
On Sunday 11 Dec 2011 21:36:53 Chris wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:04:09 -0500, Chris wrote: [...] I would put money on them taking advantage of zero day exploits and/or the courts to force the Tor project, the Freenet project, the i2p project, or any other similar project to modify the code and insert a back door. Germany did this many years ago with one project and successfully identified a user. It was none of the above projects although the ability to force upon developers code changes that go out to all users has occurred. They were targeting one individual too that appeared to be a fairly low-value target. The only thing that might stop this from happening to other projects is where the developers are operating in one country and the government attempting to force the change is in another. Another thing that might stop this from happening is open source software, and at least a bunch of coders reviewing and signing any code before it gets released. (I'm actually not sure how many coders have to currently sign -- surely it's not just Toad?) It mitigates it to a degree although the concern still exists. For a few reasons. The party who distributes the binary is going to be ordered not to reveal the modifications. The main page/download page isn't going to warn users and that is likely the only information they are going to see before updating. It becomes newsworthy information though so there is a slight chance a user who keeps up on this stuff would notice prior to installation. The court could order the source code not be released for the new binary too. At least not the code that matches the new binary. Then users would need to actually notice the binary differs from the source code and disassemble it to find the bug. How many users actually compile it themselves? How many examine the diffs? There has been some work towards a way to automatically verify the binary against the source (fortunately java compilation is deterministic!). If this is run by enough people (and assuming people actually review the code!) it could provide a strong safeguard against corrupt release managers. This is a genuine problem because laws likely to be passed in the UK, could well compromise me. If you are interested in running said script let me know and I will give details. I believe it is in the maintenance scripts repository. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet User
On Friday 25 Nov 2011 00:11:21 rennan willian wrote: Hi, i much apreciate the work of yours, but am having a little trouble with freenet. I downloaded a file from freenet, the extension is .freenet-tmp. How can i open it? Please Help That means something broke. I suggest you try renaming it to get rid of the .freenet-tmp. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet speed local threats
On Monday 12 Dec 2011 01:05:36 Chris wrote: If users and organizers are using Tor/freenet/whatever it can be difficult to determine who is organizing, who is actively participating, and who is just a supporter, or even follower (may be against the revolt). Compared to if an organizations members know each other and can be forced to talk. A government in power may not have the resources to arrest all using Tor/freenet/whatever. That gives the organizers protection (potentially or hopefully) long enough to let them carry through from the organization to the actual uprising without it's organizers being killed off. Or give them opportunity to make mistakes and re-group. I disagree with most of what you have said. However, the above is more or less on target. You need a lot of people using Freenet who aren't interested in political activism, who are just using it to talk to their friends, share files etc. Then all your Friends can be people you know (so darknet is feasible), and yet they're not all part of your guerilla cell. Also, any good movement needs martyrs. Finally ... look at what people actually used ... Facebook! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'more info : starting page remains on :…'
On Friday 25 Nov 2011 16:45:02 Jep wrote: no-re...@uservoice.com : Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc. freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report smea...@yopmail.com sent a message from https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2F [https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2F] more info : starting page remains on : Node Announcing Freenet is connecting to the network - this may take a few minutes. Performance will continue to improve during the next few hours. This will happen each time you shut down Freenet for more than a few minutes, so try to leave it running 24 hours a day if possible. We have recently sent 0 announcements, 0 of which are still running, and added 0 nodes (0 nodes have rejected us). We are currently connected to 10 seednodes and trying to connect to another 9. Does that sound familiar! Only replace that 'connected to 10' with 'connected to 0' and then keep on staring at that for days. You do refresh the nodes page manually and you do look at the 'strangers' page, I hope. Do hope too your router supports UPnP, if not, then you need to configure the router to open the Freenet ports. You can test if you have done so successfully at portforward.com. If your ports are not open, check your software firewall if you need to configure that, too. Also, realtime malware scanners can interfere. What sometimes, only sometimes works for me: shut down FN, go to the folder you installed Freenet in. Delete everything with numbers in it including nodedb4o and the temp folder. Then start FN again. Repeat as many times as necessary. If the node has not found strangers that connect within an hour, it never will. I do this routinely as FN never works for me without this drastic deleting. Did you ever find out what the problem was? If it's not managing to connect to any seednodes at all there is most likely a problem with your network connection... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'more info : starting page remains on :…'
On Thursday 24 Nov 2011 20:23:27 you wrote: more info : starting page remains on : Node Announcing Freenet is connecting to the network - this may take a few minutes. Performance will continue to improve during the next few hours. This will happen each time you shut down Freenet for more than a few minutes, so try to leave it running 24 hours a day if possible. We have recently sent 0 announcements, 0 of which are still running, and added 0 nodes (0 nodes have rejected us). We are currently connected to 10 seednodes and trying to connect to another 9. Firefox 6.0.2 (Linux) [http://uservoice.com] Did you ever get this working? It can take a while to get onto the network, but it's also possible your connection is broken, or that there is in fact a problem with Freenet... It might be worth trying again anyway... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'hii have a new freenet installed on kn…'
On Thursday 24 Nov 2011 20:16:12 no-re...@uservoice.com wrote: Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc. freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report smea...@yopmail.com sent a message from https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2F [https%3A%2F%2Ffreenetproject.org%2F] hi i have a new freenet installed on knoppix running in a vm, everything went fine but i do not get any connections once freenet is started what must i check ? Firefox 6.0.2 (Linux) [http://uservoice.com] Did you ever get Freenet working? It's possible there are network problems with your VM, have you had a node working without a VM? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Even more NPEs
On Friday 18 Nov 2011 00:38:53 Roland Häder wrote: Hi again, with latest release 1405 (sorry that I didn't mention it last mail, so please assume it always) I have some more NPEs, please see attached logfile for details. These NPEs happens while freenet is already running. Regards, Roland I think there was some work done on this. Do you still see such problems? Are you even running Freenet now? (Sorry it took so long...) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Two NPEs for FlogHelper while startup
On Thursday 17 Nov 2011 19:20:59 Roland Häder wrote: Hi all, attached is a logfile containing two exceptions while the plugin FlogHelper is starting up. This randomly happens (but often) and I have to shutdown my node, edit freenet.ini (remove the entry FlogHelper from it) and re-add the plug-in. I have a Debian Unstable AMD64 system with latest packages. Regards, Roland I've fixed the second NPE, which is in fred. I've filed a bug on FlogHelper for the first NPE. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Cannot execute OR uninstall to reinstall Freenet on 64 bit windows system - error message received
On Wednesday 09 Nov 2011 16:31:39 John adsales wrote: Re: freenet program install Tried to reinstall using the installer program but get error message again. Error message: Windows cannot access the specified device, path or file. You may not have the appropriate permissions to access the item. I try to uninstall the program using the uninstaller in the freenet directory and get the same error message. Can u advise as to a solution? I am on Windows Vista 64 bit. Appreciate your assistance. I am a medium technical user. Thanks, Did you eventually solve the problem? It works for me on Windows 7 64-bit, and XP64. Sorry for the long turnaround time! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 Issue
On Monday 07 Nov 2011 22:13:30 Dave Riley wrote: I use an Intel iMac running 10.6.8. I used freenet.jnlp, then new_installer_offline_1404.jar to Install the Freenet directory onto a 3GB TrueCrypt volume, and the tray into /Applications -- this configuration worked fine in an iMac PPC running Leopard (in fact, I later deleted the tray; I started / stopped Freenet via the Terminal.).When I tried to use the Wizard (both times)I received this page after the Data Storage page: Internal error: please report java.nio.channels.OverlappingFileLockException at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl$SharedFileLockTable.checkList(FileChannelImpl.java:1166) at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl$SharedFileLockTable.add(FileChannelImpl.java:1068) at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.lock(FileChannelImpl.java:824) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.lock(FileChannel.java:860) at freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.openStoreFiles(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:831) at freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:189) at freenet.store.saltedhash.SaltedHashFreenetStore.construct(SaltedHashFreenetStore.java:147) at freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:3591) at freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:3584) at freenet.node.Node.initSaltHashFS(Node.java:3395) at freenet.node.Node.makeStore(Node.java:900) at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:365) at freenet.node.Node$StoreTypeCallback.set(Node.java:338) at freenet.config.Option.set(Option.java:65) at freenet.config.Option.setValue(Option.java:57) at freenet.config.SubConfig.set(SubConfig.java:301) at freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE._setDatastoreSize(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:122) at freenet.clients.http.wizardsteps.DATASTORE_SIZE.postStep(DATASTORE_SIZE.java:93) at freenet.clients.http.FirstTimeWizardToadlet.handleMethodPOST(FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java:231) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.handle(ToadletContextImpl.java:550) at freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler.run(SimpleToadletServer.java:989) at freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:233) at freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:130) What am I missing? Thanks for your time. Did you ever fix this? It might be trying to run more than one copy - did it work if you open it in a web browser? Sorry for taking a long time to get back to you. You might like to try installing a more recent version if you had given up on it! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] please help
On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011 16:56:39 Fred Vishio wrote: When I try to run freenet it says that the freenet wrapper terminated unexpectedly. When I click ok another window pops up and says the launcher couldn't connect to the freenet node at port . it tells me to try to reinstall on both windows. I have reinstalled many times and it doesn't help. Did you ever get this working? You could send me your wrapper.log to try to show what is happening... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Can't access Freenet
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:07:11 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: [...] - Post your wrapper.log. You might want to look for anything incriminating (e.g. look for @ to find keys), [...] How about not logging anything incriminating by default? No port numbers, no keys, no nothing like that? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
