Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > Robert John Morton (2017-02-20 08:19:36 -0300) wrote: > >> Dear CENO team: >> >> An extremely worth-while and timely project. I wish you well. >> >> I think that the deliberate exclusion of sites from popular search engine >> listings is one of the worst forms o

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Hi Ivan, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > Hi Arne, thanks for the insights and the links. Please note that the > current CENO project is actually using Freenet as a signalling and > storage backend!`:)` It’s great to know that this is still the case! >> (I submitted a project plan for improving

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Hi, thanks for your advice! Maybe I should have mentioned that the current version of the project does use Freenet for signalling and storage, so we already enjoy these features from Freenet. The harder part will surely be dynamic or user-dependent content, along maybe privacy-preserving statisti

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Arne Babenhauserheide (2017-02-20 22:12:59 +0100) wrote: > Hi Ivan, Dear eQualit.ie Hackers, > > Aside from the web-apps part, Freenet can already provide everything > you asked for. Hi Arne, thanks for the insights and the links. Please note that the current CENO project is actually using Free

Re: [freenet-support] Building a new censorship circumvention tool: what do we need to know?

Robert John Morton (2017-02-20 08:19:36 -0300) wrote: > Dear CENO team: > > An extremely worth-while and timely project. I wish you well. > > I think that the deliberate exclusion of sites from popular search engine > listings is one of the worst forms of censorship on the Web. Perhaps the > onl