On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 07:43:51PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Just 40? I usually have to try with at least 75 or so, though obviously
> > some keys are easier than others.
>
> I thought 40 was pretty decent. I was recently told
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:44:40PM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> No, I don't think you did. thelema's pretty damn smart, and he knows
> a lot about the system, but I'd bet $50 in eGold that he's wrong about
> this particular thing. The only ways for you to get your address into
> other people's nodes a
> "TRR" == Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Me> That's baloney. Did someone tell you that on this list? You
Me> can't establish refs in other nodes by making data requests.
TRR> Perhaps I misunderstood.
No, I don't think you did. thelema's pretty damn smart, and he knows
> "RC" == Rob Cakebread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RC> Does it help if nodes.config have more than 10 entries or does
RC> it ignore anything after 10?
Wow! No, totally not. You can have like a jillion addresses in your
nodes.config.
I'm emailing a good node address to you off-list
> If everyone is sending giganto HTL 75 messages all over the Freenet,
> it'll choke the network and making it slow. If you're not finding
> stuff fast enough, try bushing up your local node (with a better
> nodes.config) rather than making "deeper" searches.
>
> ~Mr. Bad
Does it help if nodes.c
Mr. Bad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sigh. I think Hal Finney did some math and showed that any request
> with HTL over 40 is dumb and pointless.
My understanding was that *inserts* with high HTLs were bad, but
*requests* with high HTLs were good.
--
Greg Wooledge | "Truth b
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:55:01PM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> That's baloney. Did someone tell you that on this list? You can't
> establish refs in other nodes by making data requests.
I have 24M of stuff in cache. That's just freesites I've viewed
myself.
And according to the logs nobody has eve
> "GW" == Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm requesting every key I can get my hands on, all of which
>> end in error even with HTL of 40. Yuck.
GW> Just 40? I usually have to try with at least 75 or so, though
GW> obviously some keys are easier than others.
S
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 07:43:51PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Just 40? I usually have to try with at least 75 or so, though obviously
> some keys are easier than others.
I thought 40 was pretty decent. I was recently told that anything over
that tends to be a waste. I think fproxy defaults to
> "TRR" == Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TRR> I have been told that there is really nothing wrong here and
TRR> that my server just hasn't requested any popular or long
TRR> lived keys so as to establish refs with other servers and is
TRR> thus "in the ghetto".
Tha
Tracy R Reed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm
> requesting every key I can get my hands on, all of which end in error even
> with HTL of 40. Yuck.
Just 40? I usually have to try with at least 75 or so, though obviously
some keys are easier than others.
--
Greg Wooledge | "T
I have been told that there is really nothing wrong here and that my
server just hasn't requested any popular or long lived keys so as to
establish refs with other servers and is thus "in the ghetto". I'm
requesting every key I can get my hands on, all of which end in error even
with HTL of 40. Yu
It is simply a warning message from the Freenet server informing you that
you are looking at too much porn.
This error message appears because Freenet has an inbuilt porn filter and
the central Freenet server (located in Canada) will not allow more than
roughly 2.5GB of porn through in any one day
- Original Message -
From: "growingman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:03 AM
Subject: hello
> please help me.
> I have installed freenet software. But it doesn't work.
> It always tell me:
> Network Error
> Couldn't retrieve key: KSK@p
14 matches
Mail list logo
