Phil Marlowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'd like a quick and easy method of deriving the CHK key for a document,
> other than reading the nodes' response to a successful insert.
The Java is nearly indecipherable to me. But it's got something to do
with an SHA-1 digest, and a base-64 encoding
Kenneth Stailey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If KSK keys are so bogus as to allow documents to be corrupted easily why are
> they still being used?
A while back, one of the Freenet developers said something to the effect
of "if we don't have KSK, then someone would just post an SSK keypair and
p
I'd like a quick and easy method of deriving the CHK key for a document,
other than reading the nodes' response to a successful insert.
My reasons are convoluted, but they have to do with an attempt to come up
with a utility to insert large sites. Right now fcpputsite is very
perfectionist.
Two questions:
If KSK keys are so bogus as to allow documents to be corrupted easily why are
they still being used?
Assuming a better mechanism exists what is it?
If I had to ask a third question it would be about the lack of documentation.
I assume everyone already knows how this dearth of do
i tried frost on the watchme-network but no one
seems to go there anyone interested in
using frost on the watchme-network?
mfg The Bishop
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Whats the problem you are having with Freenet?
I am running it on xp with not problems so I will try and help u.
Email me or post to the Mailing List.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: [fre
Well as I understand it tries to reteve it from other nodes in the node ref
list on your node. You would need to make sure all of the nodes in your ref
node were clear of the "Kiss My Ass" key. The distance it is propagated to
is determined initally by the HTL (hopse to live) you set when you inse
It wont get over written under normal circumstances. Otherwise it would be
easy to remove cotent from Freenet that someone disliked. What happens is as
I underswtand it when you try to insert a KSK key it checks to see if the
key with the same name was already avalible in Freenet. If it is already
at http://nightwatch.dyn.dhs.org/watchme_keys.html
and SSK@eKUgfrUzcYD3mrNgx0CkOWx3rVQPAgM/watchme_test//
--
Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nightwatch.dyn.dhs.org/
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/
So I have now installed FreeNet. When I use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I
get "kiss my ass" and when I use the recommended links, I get nothing or
network error. Not excactly promissing, is it?!
The documentation is practically not excisting, yet I have a feeling that
this could lead to some thing. Ma
Can any1 help me get Freenet working on a Toshiba Satellite 1800 laptop
running WinXP?
Matt :-)
-
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contai
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Tiernan Hubble wrote:
> Is it just me, or is the watchme network not working? I realize that there
> aren't many nodes, but every node seems to be rejecting every
> NodeAnnouncement! I looked at some of the logs, and it seems some nodes are
That's because there's too few n
12 matches
Mail list logo
