[freenet-support] Freenet stable 5038/unstable 6340
Freenet stable build 5038 is now available. Upgrade using update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet.jar . The major change is to reject requests from nodes before 5034. 5032 fixed a major bug relating to trailers, which may have been causing some major problems manifesting in low sentData ratios. 5034 introduced exponential backoff, a major load balancing feature which we need to be widely deployed. Freenet unstable build 6340 is also available. This build increases the last good unstable build to 6333, and imposes a separate limit of build 5034 for the stable branch. http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-unstable-latest.jar . -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] [support-bounces@freenetproject.org: Auto-discard notification]
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Subject: Auto-discard notification From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 List-Id: X-List-Administrivia: yes The attached message has been automatically discarded. From: Victor Denisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5032 & FIW 0.07 - FEC Encoding problem? Organization: Jera Systems When I'm trying to upload a site containing a large file (~ 150 Mb) with FIW 0.07, I get the following error message in FIW when generating FEC check chunks: [Error] unexpected error while building check chunks! This gets written to FIW log: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method) at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(Unknown Source) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(Unknown Source) at java.io.FilterInputStream.read(Unknown Source) at fiw.fcp.FCPUtil.readLine(FCPUtil.java:859) at fiw.fcp.FECUtil.makeFECData(FECUtil.java:245) at fiw.fcp.FECUtil.makeFECData(FECUtil.java:182) at fiw.core.jobs.FECBuilderJob.run(FECBuilderJob.java:83) at fiw.core.jobs.Job.run0(Job.java:132) at fiw.core.jobs.PooledThreadProducer$PooledThread.run(PooledThreadProducer.jav a:97) The following is spewed on the Freenet java console window: java.io.IOException: Sent 0 bytes (27 of packet in notifyDone at freenet.node.states.FCP.NewFECEncodeSegment.sendChunk(NewFECEncodeSeg ment.java:293) at freenet.node.states.FCP.NewFECEncodeSegment.sendDataChunks(NewFECEnco deSegment.java:276) at freenet.node.states.FCP.NewFECEncodeSegment.received(NewFECEncodeSegm ent.java:95) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:192) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:68) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.run(StandardMessageHandler .java:235) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.received(StandardMessageHa ndler.java:173) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.access$100(StandardMessage Handler.java:125) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler.handle(StandardMessageHandler.jav a:73) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:323) at freenet.thread.QThreadFactory$QThread.run(QThreadFactory.java:235) I can't find anything relevant in freenet.log when set to "Normal" logging level - I can try "Debug" if this will help, but it eats valuable HDD space _really_ quickly :-(, so I'm not sure if it will be able to log enough information before I'll have to start rotating log files. I can't verify at the moment if this is only relevant for build 5032, or any previous "new stable" builds are affected as well. If any additional information would help - I'll be happy to provide it. Is this a bug with FIW/Freenet or am I doing something stupid? Regards, Victor Denisov. - End forwarded message - -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] minor bug webinstaller
Could you tell me under what circumstances the webinstaller will try to overwrite itself while running please? I see this only happening if you first download the webinstaller into the freenet application folder, and then run it, which is not really intended. If that is what you do (and if it is indeed common) then maybe I'll code for that behaviour. This intention is kinda that you just run (rather than download-and-save) the webinstaller! d - Original Message - From: "Jan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:30 PM Subject: [freenet-support] minor bug webinstaller > This is probably a well known bug but it still persists. > > The web installer tries to overwrite itself which of course isn't > possible since it is in use. > > This can be circumvented by putting the installer in a different > folder so it's not that much of a problem, just a bit confusing. > -- > groet! > jan > . > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] minor bug webinstaller
This is probably a well known bug but it still persists. The web installer tries to overwrite itself which of course isn't possible since it is in use. This can be circumvented by putting the installer in a different folder so it's not that much of a problem, just a bit confusing. -- groet! jan . ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Question on IPNetRouter for Macintosh
Hi, Just checking if I filled out the Port Mapping right. I have Freenet running on a win98 PC behind the IPNR router/firewall. Yeah, I know 98 isn't recommended, w98, w2k and xp just don't play well together on this box. In the Port Mapping window I added a line: Protocol: TCP Apparent Endpoint: : Actual Endpoint: 192.168.0.2: Flags: P S (Permanent and Static) I find the IPNR documentation pretty confusing, probably because I don't understand much of networking. So if anyone can say the above is okay, I can sleep again . Freenet does work be it very badly. Lately I also don't get past the warning page but that has been better, I've seen a couple of sites. Fuqid has managed to get a few files, Freenet Message Board starts up but doesn't show a single message, Frost idem dito. Guess I need to leave Freenet running in hope of better times. When there will be a Mac OS9 version, perhaps. Thanks for any answer. -- groet! jan . ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
