Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +, Ian Clarke wrote: > Toad wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > >>Toad wrote: > >> > >>>2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? > >>>This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, > >>>CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql > >>>or similar. > >>Um, yes - we do, dodo. > >I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of > >bandwidth usage. > > It has 15GB/month IIRC. I doubt that would be enough for full watchme functionality. It'd be fine for node registration etc though. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
Toad wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: Toad wrote: 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql or similar. Um, yes - we do, dodo. I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of bandwidth usage. It has 15GB/month IIRC. Ian. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
On 31/01/2004, at 12:32 PM, David Masover wrote: | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing). I am quite aware of what WebKit and Gecko do. It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL style wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway -- it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far there's only one server. Or 192.168.0.1 in my case. And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy features auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url". And how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet:// protocol could connect through FCP and do things like simplify splitfiles, insertions and the like with an interface that normal users could use. Sure, there's things such as fiw, but it's not the easiest of things to use. Having the whole feature set in one application would make it a lot nicer. -- Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sitharus.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> > 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? > > This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, > > CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql > > or similar. > > Um, yes - we do, dodo. > > Ian. Before anybody thinks Ian wroke up on the wrong side of the bed, dodo is the name of the machine. :) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Serious JVM bug.
I received the following error message on the console where Fred was running. Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 16 in queue, 2463 millis since enqueued last item, 5507 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. System Information: Node Version 0.5 Protocol Version STABLE-1.49 Build Number 5065 CVS Revision 1.90.2.50.2.91 $ java -version java version "1.4.2_03" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode) $ uname -a Linux 2.4.20-28_36.rh9.atsmp #1 SMP Mon Jan 5 22:54:59 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1030304 480996 549308 0 77448 200248 -/+ buffers/cache: 203300 827004 Swap: 1052248 01052248 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] potential-bug - report
hi! sometimes i get this message in my recent-logs: === Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 20 in queue, 2634 millis since enqueued last item, 1988650 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. -- Architecture and Operating System Architecturex86 Available processors1 Operating SystemWindows XP OS Version 5.1 -- Java Virtual Machine JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM NameJava HotSpot(TM) Client VM JVM Version 1.4.1_02-b06 -- Memory Allocation Maximum memory the JVM will allocate192 MiB Memory currently allocated by the JVM 130.112 KiB Memory in use 88.173.880 Bytes Estimated memory used by logger None Unused allocated memory 45.058.872 Bytes -- Data Store Maximum size16.000 MiB Used space 13.332.364 KiB Free space 3.051.636 KiB Percent used81 Total keys 48097 Space used by temp files226.276 KiB Maximum space for temp files5.592.405.500 Bytes Most recent file access timeThu Jan 29 16:04:54 CET 2004 Least recent file access time Thu May 22 19:38:56 CEST 2003 -- Transports Current IPv4 address212.202.207.168 Current IPv4 port 44294 ARK sequence number 32 Last ARK sequence number inserted 32 -- Thread Pool Total pooled threads16 Available pooled threads7 Pooled threads in use 9 -- Pooled Thread Consumers Class Threads used freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell3 freenet.node.states.data.DataStateInitiator 4 freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:true 2 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: > Toad wrote: > >2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? > >This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, > >CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql > >or similar. > > Um, yes - we do, dodo. I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of bandwidth usage. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing). It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL style wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway -- it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far there's only one server. And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy features auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url". -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQBrpewisZLIF6uqOAQJsuBAAiKP95NiE0ByRAwRamefiEB+jNM5d7wPd +QTy7x/s+SrhuarMtvnaGjZIjBzHOjv13lMm/3lA6cDlNOQjCLfapktmKN9mxn9l qQHE2ELBi8FQaYeuEkESH4M0TFQYpiUv9Zcxa5+IPzSbWOYfrRKoqUUlLHahsEAl mIFizhGfjBKRMKmia0YlcMYlUR6psuhBMVgU+A0N7oCHC8CTKeXM4HvMgUp7DOjK M1IS5YW1l7mvE0OXj2Y3+7lW6gFPT1L15qdV46OK1lc9JcUii9MD2T3sKf2Tiq0q QLNCGgv1voLkz5LLrOzJnZRAVhryE/nmfKVLlsLD1YFv2d8p5/xGhho66FvwDdRb uAwmrjK7sLy8HxSJGcsZO5MEhb+4d4nBUzycT2Xc4lnpEjRaoq0yBnDVPnvIfS3A a0GtsAuP69BTJKfM7mo+qZlyYjyBvfsztKXFwxx95F3Hq39+AISuEbdrie4TA7Cy 8+8MvMfpAoHwC0gUWkuDQLDaKGo8D8HUve2oTZLylhShNvM6wumYUYVx+fL0gViq SubnJLi7JLA3ffQ0m24FFjZQJeWAUaddqKnQeTBpNEMDrkigmzPsAens7WnIISvJ sA0MF/8TX7pYX+QMfP1AS93+LgbKJUOFCux+aby7CvtIMG3FTxafvZpGWjyqkApW 21bVOtLCkNA= =f50Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
Toad wrote: 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql or similar. Um, yes - we do, dodo. Ian. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote: Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28: Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack. In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration file set to use? If you set it to use the YThreadFactory, do things improve? Sorry. Being online for about 12 hours freenet again succeeded in overloading an "acceptable" machine (1.5GHz, 512MB Ram), leaving it doing nothing but swapping RAM. I think it's time to take a break. Perhaps I'll check back in a year ;-) I'm still of the opinion that freenet will only spread if people are able to run it on a small router or in background with no noticeable impact on performance. I agree here. My router is a 1.53Ghz Athlon (XP1800+) with 512MB of RAM. The CPU isn't taxed, but the memory is. Also, bandwidth is used quite readily. I have a quota, and it'd be nice to be able to give Freenet a maximum monthly allocation, and have it shut down after that's passed the limit. I have no problem donating 2-3GB/month of traffic, but it takes 4-5 if I don't watch it, that's with a limit of 2kb/sec both ways. It would be nice if anyone with a spare P266 box could fire up freenet and just let it sit there. If I had a second life I would help redoing the whole thing in ocaml or something like that. But I have the miserable feeling that studying medicine will keep me busy for the next years. :-( Ok, no more flame wars ;-) If I knew the protocol, and knew enough about networking, I'd do a Cocoa client. I have no problems with continually changing the protocol, I'd just have to participate on the developer mailing list. Unfortunately there's no easy place to start from. I guess that's what you get with pre-release software. Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or WebKit (for OS X) embedded in to a freenet thing, with privacy options auto set. -- Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sitharus.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
