On 15 Feb 2004 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Die E-Mail, die Sie am Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 an [EMAIL PROTECTED] gesendet
haben, konnte nicht zugestellt werden, da die E-Mail Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] nicht
existiert. Achten Sie auf die richtige Schreibung der E-Mail Adresse und
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
On 15 Feb 2004 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Die E-Mail, die Sie am Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gesendet haben, konnte nicht zugestellt
werden, da die E-Mail Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] nicht
existiert. Achten Sie auf
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
Freenet code contains a bug (a so called memory leak) which takes
memory from your OS, but then forgets about it, not using it and
not returning it - so the amount of memory
It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
that, I see that it is using 79 MB of memory. The number doesn't appear
to grow -- there is no evidence of a memory leak -- but it starts out and
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Niklas Bergh wrote:
It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
that, I see that it is using 79 MB of memory. The number doesn't appear
to grow -- there is no
In einer eMail vom So, 15. Feb. 2004 21:43 MEZ schreibt Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
On 15 Feb 2004 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Die E-Mail, die Sie am Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gesendet haben, konnte nicht zugestellt werden, da die E-Mail Adresse
