[freenet-support] Just Getting Started
Hi, I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be delighted and I don't think I'd have problems. But for now, my results with freenet have been, to say the least, lackluster. I am currently on dialup internet and using transient mode. Any suggestions on how to make things actually work? I want to just explore and load a few pieces of content... I'm running Mac OS X and don't seem to have problems loading up freenet and whatnot, it's just actually getting it to load content that's basically impossible. I'm more than reasonably terminal-comfortable. And yeah, I know I seriously need broadband. Qwest just brought DSL to my neighborhood and I'll probably sign up pretty soon here, but for now, dialup is where I'm at. Really, if people are trying to use freenet to get sensitive information (the stuff governments want to censor), it's very possible they'll be on dialup also, so I don't think there's quite zero use for dialup, you know... -Galen ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
So it seems like FUQID is not connecting to my (transient) Freenet node at all.
In my case, this could be firewall-related; ZoneAlarm is probably protecting my TCP/IP
stack a bit too aggressively. Either that, or FUQID trying to connect to the wrong
port. I'll check the client port in my Freenet node and make sure it's accessible.
How does FUQID know which port to use?
Is there some way to learn Freenet installation/configuration/general architecture
other than reading the code? I haven't really been able to find documentation at the
relevant level of detail.
Thanks, you guys are good.
-Original Message-
From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mar 9, 2004 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
> >>[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
> >>insert
> >>thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> >
> >This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to connect to the node on port
> >10061? It should try to connect on the FCP port, NOT THE FNP PORT. Check
> >your config file for clientPort=, usually 8481.
>
> I read that as "socket error 10061" which is a fairly common error code
> from sockets ;)
>
> http://www.qksoft.com/qk-smtp-server/socket-error.html
>
> It does mean FCP isn't listening though.
Is it making too many connections, resulting in the node shutting down
the FCP port? IIRC we only do that on the web interface port...
>
> ___/
> _/
>
> --
> http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] REF seeding (fwd)
the list complained about by brians-anime.com domain handled by a multidomained mailserver (server's name is ruby and it handles mail for enugen.net and brians-anime.com but idents as ruby.enugen.net) so I had to resend this with the name my server report rather than the domain I publish (brian at nospam brians-anime.com) as my email address. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:54:59 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Brian Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Freenet Support Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: REF seeding will running the freenet node over extended periods of time increase the reliability of the cached seed nodes. I seem to be in a very unstable part of the network and I can only seem to get like a 1% success rate on accesses. The majority of attempt restart at some stage and other nodes just totally decline. If just keeping the node running won't increase reliability is there another method or utility I can use to find more reliable 'uplink nodes'? Or is there somethiing I can do in configuration to make things more tolerant and increases the chances of successfully retries data under specified keys? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] windows vs. linux.. bummer
I do have a NAT box, but the listen port is forwarded. And, my pants are pulled down on the box I'm running freenet on (everything set to ACCEPT). Besides I when I plugged the cable modem into the freenet box (bypassing the NAT machine), it was still slow as a dog. I also connected my windows machine up to the NAT box to see if it would slow down, but it didn't seem to. I also upgraded to the latest j2re package from sun, still the same. The good news is that frost is finnally working, maybe not as fast as it would be on the windows machine. The ONLY page I was able to get from the freenet proxy was the FMB page after a few days of running. None of the other page's icons will even pop up. Maybe there's a better java vm to use. I don't know, I'm just taking stabs in the dark now. --- Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firewall? > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Joe Blow > wrote: > > Two systems: > > 1) Very fast linux box running suse 9.0 DSL > connection 1.2Mbit. > > 2) Slower laptop running WinXP Cable modem < > 1.0Mbit. > > > > I set up freenet 5074 on my linux box a few days > ago. I have over 2.4Gb in my store, but not even > one icon on the front page will download yet. I > can't get to any of the default links on the startup > page. > > > > Yesturday, I setup 5074 on my windows box, and it > took off! All the icons load, YoYo will open up. > Freenet on a slower windows machine with a slower > internet connection is running better than my linux > box! What's the deal? > > > > I even tried using the seednodes.ref file from my > windows machine on the linux node, and it still > didn't help. I setup my linux box off the cable > modem connection to see if that would help, but it > didn't. This is a major bummer, anyone else see > this? > > > > Another thing I don't like about the freenet setup > on linux, is that the freenet.conf file doesn't show > all the options like it used to. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > - > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for > faster. > > ___ > > Support mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - > http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > ATTACHMENT part 1.2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Freenet Connection
Hi, since several builds I have problems with both Stable and Unstable builds. First, after a major upgrade I couldn't get any data except [EMAIL PROTECTED] off freenet. I reinstalled, reseeded nodes etc - there was no luck :( Freenet built up connections, but nothing could be retrieved. When I tried unstable (i reseeded to unstable then), I had same luck as with the stable branch. Now even bigger problems - I thought, maybe I should try the new build after a while and completely removed freenet and reinstalled it. Now I wonder why is the stable ref file only 10 kb small and why i can't build up a single connection.? In the log i get hundreds of such messages: 11.03.2003 19:37:07 (freenet.node.Main$InsertARK, YThread-2, NORMAL): RouteNotFound Inserting ARK System: WinXP Pro / No SPs, 1800+ Athlon, 256 DDR. Connection: My PC --> NAT Router --> DSL Connection [DMZ/Routed] The ip is written into the config file properly. JRE: The latest 1.5 Beta, I'll try JRE1.4 stable now. Maybe it is because of it... Thank you in advance. -- no_dammagE ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] windows vs. linux.. bummer
Firewall? On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Joe Blow wrote: > Two systems: > 1) Very fast linux box running suse 9.0 DSL connection 1.2Mbit. > 2) Slower laptop running WinXP Cable modem < 1.0Mbit. > > I set up freenet 5074 on my linux box a few days ago. I have over 2.4Gb in my > store, but not even one icon on the front page will download yet. I can't get to > any of the default links on the startup page. > > Yesturday, I setup 5074 on my windows box, and it took off! All the icons load, > YoYo will open up. Freenet on a slower windows machine with a slower internet > connection is running better than my linux box! What's the deal? > > I even tried using the seednodes.ref file from my windows machine on the linux node, > and it still didn't help. I setup my linux box off the cable modem connection to > see if that would help, but it didn't. This is a major bummer, anyone else see this? > > Another thing I don't like about the freenet setup on linux, is that the > freenet.conf file doesn't show all the options like it used to. > > Thanks > > > > - > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster. > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] windows vs. linux.. bummer
Two systems: 1) Very fast linux box running suse 9.0 DSL connection 1.2Mbit. 2) Slower laptop running WinXP Cable modem < 1.0Mbit. I set up freenet 5074 on my linux box a few days ago. I have over 2.4Gb in my store, but not even one icon on the front page will download yet. I can't get to any of the default links on the startup page. Yesturday, I setup 5074 on my windows box, and it took off! All the icons load, YoYo will open up. Freenet on a slower windows machine with a slower internet connection is running better than my linux box! What's the deal? I even tried using the seednodes.ref file from my windows machine on the linux node, and it still didn't help. I setup my linux box off the cable modem connection to see if that would help, but it didn't. This is a major bummer, anyone else see this? Another thing I don't like about the freenet setup on linux, is that the freenet.conf file doesn't show all the options like it used to. Thanks Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster.___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
> >>[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
> >>insert
> >>thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> >
> >This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to connect to the node on port
> >10061? It should try to connect on the FCP port, NOT THE FNP PORT. Check
> >your config file for clientPort=, usually 8481.
>
> I read that as "socket error 10061" which is a fairly common error code
> from sockets ;)
>
> http://www.qksoft.com/qk-smtp-server/socket-error.html
>
> It does mean FCP isn't listening though.
Is it making too many connections, resulting in the node shutting down
the FCP port? IIRC we only do that on the web interface port...
>
> ___/
> _/
>
> --
> http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
insert
thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to connect to the node on port
10061? It should try to connect on the FCP port, NOT THE FNP PORT. Check
your config file for clientPort=, usually 8481.
I read that as "socket error 10061" which is a fairly common error code
from sockets ;)
http://www.qksoft.com/qk-smtp-server/socket-error.html
It does mean FCP isn't listening though.
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet usability...
Curious. What build are you running? On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:29:58PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello all, > > I used freenet a while a go. Until moving meant no broadband connection > for a while. I now have broadband again, and a machine I can leave on > all the time. So I looked into freenet again. > > On my system freenet is not stable... > > The setup: > > - System is Linux Gentoo 1.4, 256 Mb Ram, Java is Sun JKD 1.4.2 > - Network is cable, 1000 kbs down. 200 kbs up... > - Freenet version is 5074 > > After having started freenet it normally works for a while as I expect. > But after a few hours it goes haywire: > > - Nr. of Java processes is normally around 50, and varies a bit. But > then it starts oscilating between around 50 and around 150. As in: > Suddenly 100 processes are spawned, they stay around a minute, then die. > After about five minutes this repeats. > - CPU load, which is normally about 50% goes 100% > - Node does not repsond to requests. > - Network traffic almost stops. > Lots of error messages in the log files, especially "minimum request > interval violated!". After restart I'm no longer seeing this error... > > The only thing to do is restart. In order to keep my node usable I would > have to do this about every couple of hours. > > I run a process on my system that collects and graphs stats. I've got a > few nice graphs showing the nr. of Java processes on my system that show > how Freenet starts to wildly oscilate... > > If it is OK I'll post the graphs to the list. > > > Krist > > -- > > Krist van Besien Bern, Switzerland > > > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows maintainer needed was Re: [freenet-support] ditto on what "b" said!
A lot of the problem actually is due to users running nodes with old config files generated by the windows configurator, which forces all settings (doesn't write %'s), so they run with old settings such as 50 node routing tables, which mean that the unix nodes run a lot better than the windows ones, but even the unix nodes don't run well because the network is stuffed with windows nodes with stupid configs. Ian recently appealed for a maintainer for the windows config utilities... I suppose I will have to do it if nobody comes forward, but if you can do it, please contact him. The software in question is written in C. A longer term solution would be to handle configuration in the node via HTML, but *this will take considerable effort and time*. On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:33:43AM -0500, vinyl1 wrote: > I would imagine that the problem is a lot of users running nodes with older, > incompatible releases. If part of the content is only stored on such nodes, the > chance of a user with the new release being able to retrieve is very slim. If > everyone was up to date, I don't think there would be a problem. > > A good test would be to insert new content through an up-to-date node. Other users > using up-to-date nodes should be able to retrieve it quickly. > > I agree, there should be a way to notify users of older releases that they should > update their nodes. Perhaps a broadcast feature? Or maybe auto-update through > Freenet itself? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:28:36PM -0500, vinyl1 wrote:
> OK, I have the latest build (5074), the latest seed nodes, the latest
> everything I could find as of today, 3/8/2004
>
> On the Web interface, I can't load The Freedom Engine, Dolphin's Free Index,
> and Content of Evil. I can load the Freenet Help Index and YoYo. This is
> possibly due to unreachable, out-of-date nodes. The stuff that does load
> seems to work better than before.
>
> However, since I have plenty of connections, I am a little surprised I can't
> insert with FUQID. Here is a piece of my log:
>
> {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to connect to the node on port
10061? It should try to connect on the FCP port, NOT THE FNP PORT. Check
your config file for clientPort=, usually 8481.
> [2004-03-08 22:15:18] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:18] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:19] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:19] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:20] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:20] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:21] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:21] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:22] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:22] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:23] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:23] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:24] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:24] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
> [2004-03-08 22:15:25] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes
> (try 1), HTL=25
> [2004-03-08 22:15:25] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
> thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
>
> I am on dialup, and am running a transient node. It used to work OK,
> although slowly, for viewing content and using FUQID and Frost.
>
> I can see why FUQID might not be able to retrieve old content, but I cannot
> see why FUQID won't insert, unless it has hard-coded node IP addresses
> compiled into it. Release 1.2 is the latest FUQID I could find.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
>
>
> > Yes, thank you, I am already running 5074. As Vinyl1 said, I may be
> trying
> > to retrieve old inserts that are on nodes that haven't been updated. But
> > it seems like quite a lot of content is on old nodes. If that is the case
> > then I agree that there should be some way to either auto update or to
> > message people that their node is obsolete.
> >
> >
> >
> > At 11:47 AM 3/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Before you give up, please make sure you have upgraded to the
> > >latest stable build. Go to http://127.0.0.1:/ and look at
> > >the build number listed there. It should be 5074. If it is
> > >below 5066, your node is part of a dwindling network of
> > >unmaintained freenet nodes which do not communicate with
> > >the newer nodes.
> > >
> > > From http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=download :
> > >
> > >Windows users can upgrade to the latest daily Freenet "snapshot"
> > >release by clicking on "Update Snapshot" in the Freenet section of
> > >their Start menu.
> > >
> > >Linux users may similarly upgrade by running the update.sh shell
> > >script in the freenet/ directory.
> > >
> > >-- Ed Huff
> > >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Support mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > Unsubscribe at
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Proj
[freenet-support] Re: freenet commitment settings
vinyl1 schrieb:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
Looks like a error in the setup of your node or fuqid, as it can't even connect
to the FCP port of your node. Make shure you have entered the right port and
address within fuqid.
I am on dialup, and am running a transient node. It used to work OK,
although slowly, for viewing content and using FUQID and Frost.
Don't expect any good performance from a transient node on dialup.
I can see why FUQID might not be able to retrieve old content, but I cannot
see why FUQID won't insert, unless it has hard-coded node IP addresses
compiled into it. Release 1.2 is the latest FUQID I could find.
FUQID 1.3 is the latest and resolves some major bugs.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings
On 09-Mar-2004 vinyl1 wrote: > OK, I have the latest build (5074), the latest seed nodes, the latest > everything I could find as of today, 3/8/2004 > > On the Web interface, I can't load The Freedom Engine, Dolphin's Free Index, > and Content of Evil. I can load the Freenet Help Index and YoYo. This is > possibly due to unreachable, out-of-date nodes. The stuff that does load > seems to work better than before. Basing your evaluation of your node's performance on what's appearing and/or reachable via the main web interface is not a good idea. Most of the gateway sites have been horribly unreliable for quite some time now (with the exception of DFI). I really don't know why this is the case; I've had no trouble at all inserting DFI daily. To ensure that the next DBR update is inserted in time, I always start the update process (an automated, scheduled job) at least 1 1/2 hours prior to the rollover time (12:00 am GMT). I'm wondering if other gateway site maintainers are not allowing enough time in advance for their inserts to complete on time. DFI's insert got a little screwed up yesterday, due to the fact that I was in the process of running a portupgrade of my JDK under FreeBSD. Probably due to the additional load on the system from running the build, FIW somehow ended up inserting DFI one day further into the future than it was supposed to. I didn't discover this and finally get the problem corrected until about 8:30 pm CST (2:30 am GMT). I saw someone else here basing assumptions about their node's behavior on the fact that they couldn't reach YoYo! Unfortunately, Yoyo! is one of the more unreliable sites lately (no idea why). Anyway, the gist of the idea is this: don't assume that non-functioning gateway sites mean your node is not working. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Freenet usability...
Hello all, I used freenet a while a go. Until moving meant no broadband connection for a while. I now have broadband again, and a machine I can leave on all the time. So I looked into freenet again. On my system freenet is not stable... The setup: - System is Linux Gentoo 1.4, 256 Mb Ram, Java is Sun JKD 1.4.2 - Network is cable, 1000 kbs down. 200 kbs up... - Freenet version is 5074 After having started freenet it normally works for a while as I expect. But after a few hours it goes haywire: - Nr. of Java processes is normally around 50, and varies a bit. But then it starts oscilating between around 50 and around 150. As in: Suddenly 100 processes are spawned, they stay around a minute, then die. After about five minutes this repeats. - CPU load, which is normally about 50% goes 100% - Node does not repsond to requests. - Network traffic almost stops. Lots of error messages in the log files, especially "minimum request interval violated!". After restart I'm no longer seeing this error... The only thing to do is restart. In order to keep my node usable I would have to do this about every couple of hours. I run a process on my system that collects and graphs stats. I've got a few nice graphs showing the nr. of Java processes on my system that show how Freenet starts to wildly oscilate... If it is OK I'll post the graphs to the list. Krist -- Krist van Besien Bern, Switzerland ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
