[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
As far as I know, I don't know anyone running Freenet, so I'm running 
in insecure/promiscuous mode.  Freenet kindly warns me that others 
can therefore identify my node and attack it.  However, although I've 
read the FAQ and googled some, I'm not clear what sorts of attacks 
are possible, other than knowing which sites I've visited.

Freenet also reminds me to forward UDP ports X and  because 
I'm behind a NAT, and so other nodes behind symmetrical NATs can't 
connect to my node.  However, Freenet seems to be working OK in that 
I'm connected to ca. 13 nodes.  I currently don't forward any ports 
through my hardware firewall, and I hesitate to do so without 
understanding the security implications.

I'd appreciate suggestions for further reading re both issues.

Thanks again.

=
Jim Cook   





[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080425/6d999df3/attachment.html>


[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
As far as I know, I don't know anyone running Freenet, so I'm running 
in insecure/promiscuous mode.  Freenet kindly warns me that others 
can therefore identify my node and attack it.  However, although I've 
read the FAQ and googled some, I'm not clear what sorts of attacks 
are possible, other than knowing which sites I've visited.

Freenet also reminds me to forward UDP ports X and  because 
I'm behind a NAT, and so other nodes behind symmetrical NATs can't 
connect to my node.  However, Freenet seems to be working OK in that 
I'm connected to ca. 13 nodes.  I currently don't forward any ports 
through my hardware firewall, and I hesitate to do so without 
understanding the security implications.

I'd appreciate suggestions for further reading re both issues.

Thanks again.

=
Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-25 Thread Level 13
Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to 100 % all
together, and this happens at least once every 1-2 days. What's the
deal here? Is it due to the latest Java version, or are there other
causes?
An evil plot to get rid of us who still use version 0.5? :)



[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 16:51, Level 13 wrote:
> Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
> because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
> 90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
> However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
> consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to 100 % all
> together, and this happens at least once every 1-2 days. What's the
> deal here? Is it due to the latest Java version, or are there other
> causes?
> An evil plot to get rid of us who still use version 0.5? :)

You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately!

What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued requests and/or 
inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using 
now?

If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl1 also said 1143 seemed to 
be using more memory... but I don't understand what could have caused that.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080425/b1baa192/attachment.pgp>


Re: [freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook


Thank you, Volodya (and Matthew).  What actually happened was that
Freenet created a new Firefox profile, with (to me, at least) a very
strange set of color and menu preferences (e.g., no Tools), and then
Firefox saved that as the new default.  I was tired at the time, and
distracted by the fact that it insisted on installing Google Toolbar,
which I didn't want.
Running "firefox.exe -ProfileManager" has permitted me to
restore my original profile, and I can access my node fine via
<
http://127.0.0.1:/>.
At 03:48 AM 4/25/2008, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote:
Freenet now
installs an extra copy of Firefox for convinience purposes. It doesn't
depend on it, so you can safely reinstall you normal Firefox. To access
freenet go to http://localhost:/
at any of the web browsers on your machine.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

=
Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1144

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1144 is now available. Please upgrade. Please let me know if 
auto-update doesn't work for you. This build will be mandatory on Monday, and 
the main change is a couple of major bugfixes to the load limiting code which 
will hopefully result in nodes accepting fewer SSKs and more CHKs, thus 
hopefully increasing bandwidth usage and payload, especially on nodes with 
very low bandwidth limits. Apart from that, we have moved all datastore 
accesses off the UDP packet receiver thread, so that should prevent some 
timeouts, made a few minor improvements to the queue page and the useralerts, 
and limited parallel FEC decodes/encodes to 3 (even on quad core) to avoid 
running into open files limits. Please upgrade! Thanks.

Please report any bugs you find to the bug tracker, or via the relevant FMS 
boards. Thank you for using Freenet.


pgpz8hVWvF5qI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] 1143 seems to have a few problems

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 04:12, vinyl1 wrote:
> It seems that memory use is up, and so is the number of peers backed off.   
Maybe peers are experiencing memory issues?
> 
> I have cut my output bandwith in an attempt to mitigate the problem.

Can you be a bit more specific? A copy of your statistics page (ideally in 
advanced mode) for example would be useful.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080425/3e4f89c8/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 07:33, Jim Cook wrote:
> I just installed Freenet 0.7, and it seems to have replaced Firefox 2 
> with Firefox 1.  I suspect that, if I reinstall Firefox 2, I may 
> screw up Freenet.

Have you tried rebooting? Once a firefox window is open, any new attempts to 
open a firefox window will just copy the first one.
> 
> Is that so?  And if it's so, is there a workaround (other than 
> running Freenet in a virtual machine)?
> 
> Also, what's up with Google Toolbar?  Is that a requirement for 
> running Freenet-tweaked Firefox?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> =
> Jim Cook  
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080425/74f1fa2a/attachment.pgp>


Re: [freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 16:51, Level 13 wrote:
> Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
> because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
> 90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
> However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
> consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to 100 % all
> together, and this happens at least once every 1-2 days. What's the
> deal here? Is it due to the latest Java version, or are there other
> causes?
> An evil plot to get rid of us who still use version 0.5? :)

You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately!

What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued requests and/or 
inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using 
now?

If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl1 also said 1143 seemed to 
be using more memory... but I don't understand what could have caused that.


pgpaR1cFo00UN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-25 Thread Level 13
Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so,
because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching
90 % or more rendering the computer useless.
However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts
consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it to 100 % all
together, and this happens at least once every 1-2 days. What's the
deal here? Is it due to the latest Java version, or are there other
causes?
An evil plot to get rid of us who still use version 0.5? :)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] 1143 seems to have a few problems

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 04:12, vinyl1 wrote:
> It seems that memory use is up, and so is the number of peers backed off.   
Maybe peers are experiencing memory issues?
> 
> I have cut my output bandwith in an attempt to mitigate the problem.

Can you be a bit more specific? A copy of your statistics page (ideally in 
advanced mode) for example would be useful.


pgpbv4UiELpg8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 25 April 2008 07:33, Jim Cook wrote:
> I just installed Freenet 0.7, and it seems to have replaced Firefox 2 
> with Firefox 1.  I suspect that, if I reinstall Firefox 2, I may 
> screw up Freenet.

Have you tried rebooting? Once a firefox window is open, any new attempts to 
open a firefox window will just copy the first one.
> 
> Is that so?  And if it's so, is there a workaround (other than 
> running Freenet in a virtual machine)?
> 
> Also, what's up with Google Toolbar?  Is that a requirement for 
> running Freenet-tweaked Firefox?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> =
> Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 


pgpBqRytVVUbS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
I just installed Freenet 0.7, and it seems to have replaced Firefox 2 
with Firefox 1.  I suspect that, if I reinstall Firefox 2, I may 
screw up Freenet.

Is that so?  And if it's so, is there a workaround (other than 
running Freenet in a virtual machine)?

Also, what's up with Google Toolbar?  Is that a requirement for 
running Freenet-tweaked Firefox?

Thanks

=
Jim Cook