[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Michael Stather
t; Support mailing list >> Support at freenetproject.org >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >> Unsubscribe at >> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > >> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe >> >> >> > > > > > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe The biggest problem is IMHO that the links in the start menu point to programs which should run with administrator privilegies. A simple "right-click->preferences->compatibility->"run as administrator" is enough. Freenet runs beautifully under Vista (tested with Vista Business x64 with java 6 u13). A page explaining this, linked from the downloads page, would be a good workaround in time. Should be under an hour to create ;) regards Michael -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090401/152b0eaf/attachment.html>

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
/news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090401/b64114a9/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Juiceman
-- -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: updatescript2.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 12736 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090401/496a95f7/attachment.obj>

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread mih...@riseup.net
I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is coming soon'. > Have you filed a bug report describing the problem in detail? > > Ian. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:35 AM, wrote: > >> I would conside

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread mih...@riseup.net
I would consider donating if there was a Freenet version that installs reliably on Vista. As yet I have not managed a successful install. Best, Mihail > Hey all, > > As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for > Matthew for only another 25 days. As many of you are a

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Luke771
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:21:01 -0500 Ian Clarke wrote: > Hey all, > > As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for > Matthew for only another 25 days. > > Thanks, > > Ian. > Forwarded to Frost, Freenet board. NOT forwarded to FMS --

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Juiceman
2009/4/1 Matthew Toseland : > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:54:00 mih...@riseup.net wrote: >> I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots >> of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is >> coming soon'. > > Yes, it's a known problem, the eas

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:54:00 mih...@riseup.net wrote: > I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots > of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is > coming soon'. Yes, it's a known problem, the easier solution is to use the start.exe

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
bscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090401/def1c543/attachment.html>

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
rizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090401/0d47961d/attachment.html>

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread mihail
I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is coming soon'. > Have you filed a bug report describing the problem in detail? > > Ian. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:35 AM, wrote: > >> I would conside

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
Have you filed a bug report describing the problem in detail? Ian. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:35 AM, wrote: > I would consider donating if there was a Freenet version that installs > reliably on Vista. As yet I have not managed a successful install. > > Best, > > Mihail > > > Hey all, > > > > As

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread mihail
I would consider donating if there was a Freenet version that installs reliably on Vista. As yet I have not managed a successful install. Best, Mihail > Hey all, > > As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for > Matthew for only another 25 days. As many of you are a

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
Hey all, As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for Matthew for only another 25 days. As many of you are aware, Matthew's contribution to development is fundamental, and it would be a serious blow to the project if we could no-longer pay him. I know times are tough,