[freenet-support] Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets.

2009-04-20 Thread Samuli Löf
Information * Freenet 0.7 Build #1208 r26736 * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090420/f2df6602/attachment.html>

[freenet-support] We need more seednodes

2009-04-20 Thread sich
Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > If you are able to run a seednode, please send me your opennet noderef. > Thanks. You will need: > - To not be behind a NAT, or to have a working port forward. > - To have a static IP address or dyndns address. > - To have a reasonable amount of bandwidth, preferably

[freenet-support] We need more seednodes

2009-04-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
your node. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090420/152c063a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] We need more seednodes

2009-04-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
If you are able to run a seednode, please send me your opennet noderef. Thanks. You will need: - To not be behind a NAT, or to have a working port forward. - To have a static IP address or dyndns address. - To have a reasonable amount of bandwidth, preferably over 256kbps upstream. - To enable be

Re: [freenet-support] We need more seednodes

2009-04-20 Thread sich
Matthew Toseland a écrit : If you are able to run a seednode, please send me your opennet noderef. Thanks. You will need: - To not be behind a NAT, or to have a working port forward. - To have a static IP address or dyndns address. - To have a reasonable amount of bandwidth, preferably over

Re: [freenet-support] Could not start web interface: java.net.BindException: Address already in use

2009-04-20 Thread Florent DANIEL
Juiceman a écrit : On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Florent DANIEL fdan...@noos.fr wrote: Florent DANIEL a écrit : Matthew Toseland a écrit : On Saturday 18 April 2009 09:18:39 Florent DANIEL wrote: I've checked my freenet.ini (which hasn't been modified in