Anyone here fluent in English and French, and not otherwise occupied in
Freenet? Since batosai is leaving, we need a new French translator. IMHO
French is an important language. Let us know if you can do this...
pgpjHWrjLYgNN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Monday 05 January 2009 04:53, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:11:07 -0500, Dennis Nezic
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:41:42 +, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 26 December 2008 17:50, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> &g
On Saturday 03 January 2009 23:14, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> salaman...@kkgo71wbfzigge-v...
>
> The IRC logs on emu.freenetproject.org aren't working for 2009. Is someone
> going to fix this?
>
Seems to have been fixed.
pgp4nvHZvYXxU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:14, Shironeko wrote:
> Dear Freenet Support Team,
>
> I send you this message because I've stumbled upon a "curiosity" which I'd
> like to get explained since I'm not able to find any other documentation
> regarding this issue.
>
> I was browsing through my hard dr
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> So, Freemulet or Frost "automatic insertion" are dangerous? We know the key
> before the upload of the file.
Yes IMHO.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>
> &
On Saturday 03 January 2009 21:39, cas200 wrote:
> Hello, I got this messages today:
>
> "Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not
> acknowledging packets."
>
> "1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
> even after 10 minutes). This i
On Saturday 03 January 2009 14:39, krisstoffn...@voila.fr wrote:
> 1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code
> The affected peers are:85.229.21.37:54144
Thanks. This is unfortunately a known issue, and
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:05, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:56:48 +0000, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > > So, Freemulet or Frost "automatic insertion" are dangerous? We know
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly.
> > > Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :)
> >
> > I do not know much about the freenet internal
On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:30, bqz69 wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2009 16:52:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote:
> > > > > But, Bzq69, your wrapper d
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:40, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > Do you have the
> > > most recent freenet-ext.jar?
> > Yes
> >
> > Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009:
> >
>
On Friday 09 January 2009 22:05, bqz69 wrote:
> > His wrapper stopped at
> > 33minutes past the hour, while his own cronjob wrapper is set to run
> > every ten minutes... so even after 7minutes, "run.sh status" still said
> > it was running, or something.
>
> My freenet just stopped again, here is
Freenet 0.7 build 1195 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP. There are
several important changes in this build and recently, the first two of which
have caveats:
- Freenet nodes now accept fewer parallel requests. This is an attempt to
reduce the average time taken by a successful CHK fetch, wh
Freenet 0.7 build 1196 is now available, and is mandatory. It should be
downloaded by your node automatically. Please upgrade.
We are still working on the request latency optimisations that we started on
Saturday. We have discovered that the median time taken by a typical CHK
request is vastly
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
> port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
> have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
> computer (in opennet
Applied in SVN r25051. Will be in the next build. Thanks! Please send
translation updates to the devl list next time.
pgpKJzUtqHO5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.f
On Sunday 11 January 2009 17:18, anonymous freenet wrote:
> hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
> reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
> times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
> big? i
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
> > increased by 20 percent.
> >
> > With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
Freenet 0.7 build 1197 is now available, and is mandatory at midnight. Please
upgrade. Nodes with auto-deploy-update disabled may have problems, since in
1195 a bug was introduced which broke the Update Now button, which is fixed
in 1197. If you are in this situation please either update manuall
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 14:12, mih...@riseup.net wrote:
> I have now found that in the directory 'Users' there is a folder for my
> usual username and also one for 'Freenet' but I can find no icons to click
> on there or any way of switching to that user ...
This is normal. We create a user for
Freenet 0.7 build 1198 is now available, and will be mandatory at midnight
GMT.
The main change is request turtling. This is an attempt to reduce the average
request latency by cutting off request transfers at 60 seconds - we cancel
the downstream transfers, and backoff the node, but let it co
On Saturday 17 January 2009 16:01, Alberto Ramallo wrote:
> Dear sirs
>
> For about two years I have supported the Freenet Project with a monthly
monetary subscription. I am afraid I can no longer help to sustain it.
>
> I would like to unsubscribe to it. It is frustrating to me not finding
an
Freenet 0.7 build 1199, 1200 and 1201 are now available (sorry, I needed some
changes to Freenet for the new installer...). Please upgrade to 1201. Also,
there have been some important changes to the installer.
1199:
- Minor changes to turtling: Backoff from nodes which send a turtle transfer
w
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> >
> > > > Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly
> > > > the last week.
> > > >
> > > > I did following (I am using ubuntu 8.04):
> > > >
> > > > 1. Created a te
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 18:16, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > &
Freenet 0.7 build 1203 is now available. Please upgrade.
The main change in 1203 is that history cloaking is removed. It is very messy
code-wise and does not really solve the problem - for example, if a user
posted the key for something they had inserted, and forgot to remove
the ?secureid= add
On Thursday 22 January 2009 08:53, Tomas Gutierrez wrote:
> Dear friends, I thank you in advance for any support I get. Although I am
> not that computer illiterate, I am new to Freenet and its language, so I
> request a measure of patience with me.
>
> My computer is a duo core, 31/2 gigs of RAM
On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
> > > message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
> > > memory/cpu usage before it shuts itself down, in the case of the
> > > deadlock I mentioned.
>
On Thursday 22 January 2009 12:59, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 22 January 2009 03:58, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > My main point in my last post was a suggestion to have the error
> > > > message more informative. As another example, have it output it's
&g
On Thursday 22 January 2009 22:30, Ancoron Luciferis wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Freenet 0.7 build 1203 is now available. Please upgrade.
> >
> > The main change in 1203 is that history cloaking is removed. It is very
messy
> > code-wise and does not rea
On Friday 23 January 2009 01:53, [Anon] Anon User > wrote:
> -BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
> Message-type: plaintext
>
> In Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> >>> > > The real solution to browser history stealing is simply to use a
separate
> >&
On Saturday 24 January 2009 17:41, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > There have been some question marks over whether it is possible to
> > load an image from an external domain and get a callback when it is
> > loaded - if s
On Saturday 24 January 2009 18:18, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We
> > should also warn about it in the README...
>
> You mean the executable/jar can still
On Sunday 25 January 2009 03:42, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:10:57 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > h...@5fejudg2zdeqo-u4yoywc1zf4tgpwowlqcajvgcorv8 wrote:
> >
> > I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194).
It would have been helpful to have known about this a
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box
> > > out the
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 07:24, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> Don s...@tgzmfuebneqarnhpyqj4of3-s21b0utliyfallq0bw8 wrote:
> > One of the recent Freenet builds caused my Freenet node end up with
> > almost constant 100% CPU usage. This trouble began somewhere inbetween
> > 1199-1203 releases. M
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 19:09, Joseph Schultz wrote:
> I think I installed FreeNet, but when I go to the site listed I get
> the following message:
>
>
>
> Safari can’t connect to the server.
>
> Safari can’t open the page “http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/” because it
> could not connec
On Monday 02 February 2009 23:23, Mr. Flibble wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> During the past few updates, I don't seen to be getting any opennet peers
> to attach to me.
> I have no firewall, not NATed, and it worked fine until the late 119x
> builds.
> Any ideas what I can do to get it to work?
> I don'
On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 200
On Thursday 12 February 2009 16:43, Luke771 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
> SmallSister development wrote:
>
> > Luke771 wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
> > > Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> > >>
Freenet 0.7 build 1205 is now available. Please upgrade. Mostly this is
optimisations and minor bugfixes. There are also some changes related to
inserting big freesites (or librarian indexes), backported from the db4o
branch, and some minor changes.
If you find a bug, please let us know! Report
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 18:33:24 Michel wrote:
> Hello
>
> Just to warning you that freenet 0.7 doesn't run under Windows Vista
Ultimate, it deactivate my license after a blue screen death because freenet
have vista wireless drivers conflict and I have to reactivate my licencing
with Micr
On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote:
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> >> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
> >
> > More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
>
> My main complain is,
On Sunday 08 March 2009 19:56:37 Noyb Castagna wrote:
> when attempting to start freenet, I get the browser "page load error"
message:
>
> Failed to Connect
>
> Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:.
>
>
> Though the site seems valid, the browse
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:05:13 Keith * wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, you are not correct. I have it on my Vista laptop.
It doesn't reliably support Vista. Many users have reported problems with the
start/stop scripts. This will be fixed in the coming months.
signature.asc
Descri
On Thursday 05 March 2009 23:33:12 tripplehelix wrote:
> How do I start my node back up after restarting my mac?
>
It should come up by itself; click on the browse script (on the desktop). If
not, use the start.sh script in the directory it was installed into. Please
let me know if it doesn't st
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:54:00 mih...@riseup.net wrote:
> I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots
> of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is
> coming soon'.
Yes, it's a known problem, the easier solution is to use the start.exe
The DB4O branch has finally been merged! Actually it was merged on Thursday,
but I've been going through the diffs to make sure I haven't done anything
catastrophic. The db4o branch was a project to make Freenet use a database
(db4o) for tracking the status of persistent requests and inserts, th
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 23:27:53 Juiceman wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Matthew Toseland :
> > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:54:00 mih...@riseup.net wrote:
> >> I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots
> >> of problems running Freenet o
I released 1207 yesterday, but didn't insert it to the auto-updater. At the
time new nodes were failing to load any of the default plugins. I discovered
that there was a bug breaking FCP inserts in 1207, so fixed it and released
1208, and have now started both inserting to the auto-updater.
Ple
On Saturday 18 April 2009 09:18:39 Florent DANIEL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My node doesn't want to come up anymore, wrapper.log ends with the
> following messages :
>
> ERROR | wrapper | 2009/04/17 19:32:21 | Startup failed: Timed out
> waiting for signal from JVM.
> ERROR | wrapper | 2009/04/17
If you are able to run a seednode, please send me your opennet noderef.
Thanks. You will need:
- To not be behind a NAT, or to have a working port forward.
- To have a static IP address or dyndns address.
- To have a reasonable amount of bandwidth, preferably over 256kbps upstream.
- To enable "be
On Monday 20 April 2009 18:21:44 sich wrote:
> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> > If you are able to run a seednode, please send me your opennet noderef.
> > Thanks. You will need:
> > - To not be behind a NAT, or to have a working port forward.
> > - To have a static I
Anecdotal evidence suggests that right now at least one third of our content
persistence problems boil down to this one bug: "I added it 2 weeks ago and
it still hasn't got past 0% (0/1)". A new key type, DHKs (Duplicated Hash
Keys), would solve the problem, but the new keys would be twice as lo
On Thursday 23 April 2009 14:36:37 xor wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:17 PM
> > To: support@
On Thursday 23 April 2009 17:25:11 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > GORY DETAILS:
> >
> > Currently we use:
> > CHK@,,
> >
> > (Filenames afterwards are manifests, and therefore impact on the CHK)
>
On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote:
> On Thursday 23 April 2009 06:16:40 am Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Anecdotal evidence suggests that right now at least one third of our
> > content persistence problems boil down to this one bug: "I added it 2
weeks
On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetw...@web.de wrote:
> 1) CHK-keys are already long enough
Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough to be functional?
I dispute the latter.
> 2) why add something that tries to fix something broken (routing?) or
> contradicts the concept (
Freenet 0.7 build 1209 is out (sorry it took so long, I understand there were
some fairly bad bugs in 1208). Please upgrade. Lots of changes, including:
- Lots of bugfixes related to the db4o merge.
- A progress page shown when a page or file fetched through fproxy will take
more than 5 seconds t
On Monday 04 May 2009 21:21:50 Victor Denisov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since my node autoupdated to 1208, my system's performance degraded so
> much as to render it completely unusable while Freenet is running. I
> can't perform simplest tasks, such as surfing or typing a document, as
> switching betwe
What OS do you use for Freenet?
What is your current datastore size set to?
What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
This will help us to make decisions about new performance features ...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna
have
> > to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work largely
> > funded by Google's
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna
have
> > to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work largely
> > funded by Google's
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna
have
> > to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work largely
> > funded by Google's
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 15:26:12 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote:
> > Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to ERROR
> > for now, as with NORMAL level it logs ~2Mb per minute, adding
> > noticeably to overall disk contention.
>
>
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 13:54:16 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> What OS do you use for Freenet?
>
> What is your current datastore size set to?
>
> What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
>
> What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
>
> This will help us
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 19:12:17 Victor Denisov wrote:
> >> The problem's that Freenet *doesn't* even use the amount of memory I
> >> provide it with (I'm yet to see it use more than 120 megs out of 320 I
> >> allow for the heap). I'd be willing to dedicate as much memory as
> >> required if only
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 19:18:13 Victor Denisov wrote:
> > Do you have uploads queued as well as downloads? Generally uploads cost a
bit
> > more than downloads do with db4o...
>
> No, only downloads. Total queued size varied between 25 Mb and 350 Mb in
> my tests (but actual total file size was
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote:
> >>> Matthew Toseland wrot
https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/FreenetInstaller.exe
This should be Vista-compatible. It is entirely Zero3's work. Please test it
before we release it to all Windows users! In particular, testing on Vista
and Windows 7 would be very helpful (since the existing installer doesn't
work
On Friday 08 May 2009 09:11:01 Luke771 wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > What OS do you use for Freenet?
> >
> ubuntu 9.10 x86 desktop with sun java6
> > What is your current datastore size set to?
> >
> dedicated freenet disk 500gb, datastore set
On Friday 08 May 2009 06:01:06 Juiceman wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 19:18:13 Victor Denisov wrote:
> >> > Do you have uploads queued as well as downloads? Generally uploads cost
a
> > bit
> >
On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:06:24 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Ma
I will post this on the website tomorrow if there are no objections. If anyone
can suggest any improvements, please do so; sometimes what I write isn't
readable by human beings!
7th May, 2009 - Another big donation!
Google's Open Source team has donated US$18,000 to the Freenet Project to
supp
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 23:26:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > 7th May, 2009 - Another big donation!
>
> How about: "Google makes a second donation to Freenet!"
>
> Everything else looks good.
Last time the
On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote:
> >> Weird. node.db4o was an insane 375 MB. I deleted it and and added a
> >> bunch of downloads. Now it is less than 10 MB. That definitely
> >> helped some with the disk thrashing.
> >>
> >> I think I found the main problem, and I'm embarrassed t
I have deployed the new wininstaller, for Vista/win7 users and anyone who
clicks on "Windows instructions". Win2K/XP users with working JWS will still
see the old installer for now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 18:29:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote:
> >> >> Weird. node.db4o was an insane 375 MB. I deleted it and and added a
> >> >> bunc
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 18:29:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote:
> >> >> Weird. node.db4o was an insane 375 MB. I deleted it and and added a
> >> >> bunc
On Saturday 02 May 2009 11:09:37 theymos wrote:
> Freenet asked me to report this bug to you. I'm on Freenet 0.7 Build #1209
rbuild01209-real, Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771. I just updated to 1209 a few
hours ago. I updated using update.cmd because the built-in update wasn't
working.
>
> Probabl
On Friday 15 May 2009 20:30:05 webspon...@voila.fr wrote:
> I got this error : Le plugin KeyExplorer n'a pas pu être chargé : could not
find class def, may a missing lib?
>
> I've tried reinstalling Freenet but I always got this error.
> I think I've miss something, It's a fresh new install of D
On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:55:17 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> Since db4o, the freenet directory exceeds the maximum size of the datastore.
> This is an important issue, because my freenet directory is located on a
> partition equal to the size of the datastore (it remains less than 1 GB of
> fr
sk option, so that changing the default will not change it
for individual nodes.
>
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:55:17 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > > Since db4o, the freenet directory exceeds the
Freenet 0.7 build 1210 is out. Sorry for the delay in announcing it. It will
be mandatory at midnight. There was also a minor git mess relating to
tagging - it was released from a local branch because I forgot to push before
tagging, although it has been merged back into master now. If you are
On Monday 18 May 2009 23:51:33 Eric Chadbourne wrote:
> When I try to load the plugin manually it fails. Google revealed no
> solution. Tips?
> Thanks,
> Eric C
Should be fixed now. Is it?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 17 May 2009 22:24:57 Juiceman wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 18:29:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland
> >> wrote:
> >> > On
On Sunday 17 May 2009 21:30:28 Juiceman wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 May 2009 11:09:37 theymos wrote:
> >> Freenet asked me to report this bug to you. I'm on Freenet 0.7 Build
#1209
> > rbuild01209-real,
On Monday 18 May 2009 03:12:06 [Anonymous] Anon User wrote:
>
> I noticed on the website that you're working towared 0.8 being
> released later this year. will you be including premix (onion)
> routing in this release?
Maybe. It will probably include Bloom filter sharing. This may or may not
On Friday 22 May 2009 11:38:10 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> *With Salt-Hash :*
>
> My freenet partition and the pages 127.0.0.1:/... take tens of seconds
> or several minutes to display (files, directory, freesites, config,
> statistics...). In addition, my stats:
>
> CHK Request RTT=1m7s
>
The java-based installer has been updated. Windows users already see the
windows installer, this is for mac and linux users. The installer no longer
asks about auto-start, plugins or auto-update (all but auto-start are asked
in the first-time wizard), start on reboot support on OS/X should be fi
On Saturday 23 May 2009 00:13:44 Juiceman wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:25 PM, SmallSister development
> wrote:
> >> One or more of your peers says that the auto-update key is blown!
> >> This means that an attacker may know the private key for the
> >> auto-update system and can therefore ca
On Monday 25 May 2009 00:44:39 Mel Charters wrote:
> >Content-Type: multipart/signed;
> > boundary="nextPart4781.itDmzZxNSO";
> > protocol="application/pgp-signature";
> > micalg=pgp-sha1
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >The java-based installer has been updated. Windows users al
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 04:22:21 Mel Charters wrote:
> I installed it after you announced the java-based installer had been
> updated. I used: sh update.sh
No, that does not install anything, it merely updates the jars.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:26:05 Luke771 wrote:
> Peter J. wrote:
> > On Monday 25 May 2009 07:28:33 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > > I also have the same message with another IP.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development <
> > >
> > > smallsis...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1212 is now available. Please upgrade.
1211 changelog:
- Improve various text strings, including the search button and the config page
section titles.
- Fix adding noderefs that included the text "End" e.g. in an ARK key.
- Minor changes to the salted hash datastore (related to p
On Thursday 28 May 2009 22:29:49 user1 wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > What OS do you use for Freenet?
> > >
>
> ubuntu 8.04 i586 desktop
>
> > > What is your current datastore size set to?
>
> 20 GB
>
> > > What is your out
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 15:41:47 SmallSister development wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Freenet 0.7 build 1212 is now available. Please upgrade.
> [...]
> > 1212: - Recently we have had several reports of bogus claims by peers
> > that the auto-update key has bee
On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread
> > limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread
> > usage). (My node's thread limit is 300
On Monday 01 June 2009 10:12:52 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal
> error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'.
> File size is from 7 to 23 MB. Does this happen only for me?
How many are the former and how many the latter?
signatur
On Monday 01 June 2009 10:12:52 bbac...@googlemail.com wrote:
> It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal
> error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'.
> File size is from 7 to 23 MB. Does this happen only for me?
Are these persistent/global uploads or not? Ran out of retr
801 - 900 of 2703 matches
Mail list logo
