On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:26:05 Luke771 wrote: > Peter J. wrote: > > On Monday 25 May 2009 07:28:33 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > > I also have the same message with another IP. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development < > > > > > > smallsis...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > theymos wrote: > > > > > I just got this message. What do I do? > > > > > > > > > > Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)! > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Yeah got the same message, 1 ip reports that the auto-update key is blown. > > Ip is in the range of 193.11.208.0/24. Some Student network in Goteborg. > > > > > > Freenet 0.7 Build #1210 build01210 > > Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 > > > > > wild guess: someone played with his node to make it send that > announcement but the key was wrong because he didnt actually have it. > now why would anyone do something like this? to see where the reports > come from?
Well he already knows their IPs so it doesn't do much good to have their email addresses. This should be fixed by 1212. We will give the peer a reasonable time to start transferring the data, and if they don't, we stop worrying about them.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe