On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:26:05 Luke771 wrote:
> Peter J. wrote:
> > On Monday 25 May 2009 07:28:33 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > > I also have the same message with another IP.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development <
> > >
> > > smallsis...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > > theymos wrote:
> > > > > I just got this message. What do I do?
> > > > >
> > > > > Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!
> > > > >
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> > Yeah got the same message, 1 ip reports that the auto-update key is blown.
> > Ip is in the range of 193.11.208.0/24. Some Student network in Goteborg.
> >
> >
> > Freenet 0.7 Build #1210 build01210
> > Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
> >
> >
> wild guess: someone played with his node to make it send that 
> announcement but the key was wrong because he didnt actually have it.
> now why would anyone do something like this? to see where the reports 
> come from?

Well he already knows their IPs so it doesn't do much good to have their email 
addresses.

This should be fixed by 1212. We will give the peer a reasonable time to start 
transferring the data, and if they don't, we stop worrying about them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to