[freenet-support] How to attack Freenet with bogus keys

Forwarded from Frost's freenet board: Set up 5 nodes on 5 different ISP's. Dedicate two of them as insert nodes, and the other three as fetch nodes. The two insert nodes continually generate 300KB files from /dev/urandom and insert them into Freenet. They keep track of the keys corresponding to

[freenet-support] tempDir filling up with files

Running build 6468 on Linux 2.6.2 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 VM, I get lots of temp-*-1-* files in store/temp which don't go away after being closed. Only a node restart will delete them. The files appear and stay even if there is no client software running.

[freenet-support] NPE at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.sendPacket

Getting these sporadically with 5068 on Linux 2.6.2 Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1: 11.02.2004 02:07:17 (freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop, Network writing thread, ERROR): Caught java.lang.NullPointerException notifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: xx.x.x.x:x,[EMAIL

[freenet-support] Failed to read data from disk, using empty file.

Getting lots of these with build 6481, Blackdown 1.4.2-rc1 on Linux 2.6.2: 14.02.2004 00:00:00 (freenet.diagnostics.FileEventDequeue, YThread-185, ERROR): Failed to read data from disk, using empty file. java.io.EOFException at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:268)

[freenet-support] some stack traces for 5074

Running build 5074 on Linux 2.6.3 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1. 06.03.2004 07:24:19 (freenet.node.Node, YThread-22, ERROR): Error while receiving message freenet.Message: Accepted @[EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: raddr:rportlocal,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

[freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites

First they came for the child porn sites ... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, so what should we do to prevent them from getting

[freenet-support] NPEs and other exceptions with 5085

Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode) on Linux 2.6.7, Athlon XP. The IOExceptions are during startup, the others when the node is running. There is also a typo in MuxConnectionHandler.java: 'utbound' rather than 'outbound'. 23.07.2004 17:40:34

[freenet-support] Build 5085 crashing with signal 11

Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode) on Linux 2.6.7, Athlon XP. After running for about 12 hours, the node dies with this message on the console: Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x4041DCFE Function=(null)+0x4041DCFE

[freenet-support] start-freenet.sh patch to disable NPTL on SuSE Linux

Since version 9.1 SuSE is using NPTL by default. To tell an application not to use NPTL, it is recommended to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.1. You'll find a trivial patch to start-freenet.sh attached to this mail. --- start-freenet.sh.bak2004-07-22 22:43:47.0 +0200 +++

Re: [freenet-support] start-freenet.sh patch to disable NPTL on SuSE Linux

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote: Will be committed to unstable soon. Having read http://people.redhat.com/drepper/assumekernel.html I think we can do away with the distribution check and set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.1 for all Linux distributions. Patch for start-freenet.sh

[freenet-support] NPE with build 5087

Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_05-b04, mixed mode) on Linux 2.6.7, Athlon XP using Athlon-optimized jbigi libs from latest freenet-ext.jar. Another bug(?): only transmitting connections are marked as active in

[freenet-support] (no subject)

On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED]| (Matthew Findley) writes | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work. | First I should probably clear this up. I am not a lawyer. I work at the | U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is | legal

[freenet-support] Too high probability error message in 5092

Getting lots of these after running build 5092 for about 23 hours with very few error messages (Sun JVM 1.4.2_05-b04 on Linux 2.6.8.1): 27.08.2004 22:41:25 (freenet.node.rt.EdgeKludgingBinaryRunningAverage, YThread-193, ERROR): Too high probability: 1.134 while kludging [EMAIL PROTECTED] (-134

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main network. There might be now, but the idea of

[freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

you have a right to know USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3W QCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way

[freenet-support] Req: official release of patch for 0.5

(please excuse me if this is a duplicate) Toad, Recently a message by you was xposted to 0.5 about a crypto weakness you folks discovered in 0.7 that 0.5 is also subject to. After some discussion, one individual came up with a patch and procedure for fixing this on 0.5. While a lot will

[freenet-support] I almost forgot

In my earlier request for the crypto fix build for 0.5, I forgot to ask if you'd also be willing to incorporate the "painkiller" mods in 5108? Thanks again