[freenet-support] Installing Freenet with Yum

2005-04-03 Thread Peter J.
Hello, I try to install freenet with Yum. = yum install fred.noarch I'm getting the following error messages: = Downloading Packages: = (1/3): fec-1.0.3-2.noarch 100% |=| 93 kB00:00 = (2/3): fred-0.5-5101.noar 100% |=| 3.2 MB00:04 =

Re: [freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-06 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote: I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to use freenet since the last update): INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) snip loglines Should I be concerned

Re: [freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-06 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56:41 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote: I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to use freenet since the last update): INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308

Re: [freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-07 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:46:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56, Peter J. wrote: snip 3. That could explain alot: download: aprox. 3.3 Gib upload     : aprox. 2.4 Gib That's a fair amount too. The downloads will use a significant amount

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-15 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-15 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be told if it

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. Yes had that also with

Re: [freenet-support] Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!

2009-05-25 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 25 May 2009 07:28:33 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: I also have the same message with another IP. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: theymos wrote: I just got this message. What do I do? Auto-update key blown according to

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-15 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: > 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even > after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report > it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at > support at

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-15 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote: > On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: > > 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets > > even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please > > repor

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests > that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be > told if it

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote: > On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided > > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests > >

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites > like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? > I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. > Yes had that

[freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-06 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote: > I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to > use freenet since the last update): > > INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 > failures) > > Should I be concerned about

[freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-06 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56:41 Peter J. wrote: > On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:49:07 Mr. Flibble wrote: > > I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to > > use freenet since the last update): > > > > INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:

[freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-06 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 19:32:30 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > 3 questions: > 1. Please post your freenet.ini. What's the database memory usage limit > setting set to? > 2. What's the node's memory limit set to? > 3. How much stuff do you have on the queue? Approximate total bytes to >

[freenet-support] Odd startup errors

2008-09-07 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:46:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 06 September 2008 18:56, Peter J. wrote: > > 3. That could explain alot: > > download: aprox. 3.3 Gib > > upload ? ? : aprox. 2.4 Gib > > That's a fair amount too. The downl