Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1294
Hi (Don't want to be offensive) but there is the possibility to send this email before sending the update ? Maybe this is OT (lazy to find where to post it) but it's to hard to add in FCP specifically in SimpleProgress message the start time or the request running time ? I was trying but the code it quite cryptic so I desist. Regards, PS: Nice work out there, a lot of updates the last days On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:15 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1294 is now available, please upgrade as it will be > mandatory on Monday. Changes include: > - Fix (or workaround depending on your point of view) a major bug in the > cooldown queue code, which was causing the node to stall. > - Various improvements to the block transfer code (block receiver code this > time, it was block transmitter code in 1293), simpler code, hopefully more > reliable and fewer timeouts. > - French translation update. > - Minor request level fixes related to turtling, including fixing an > IllegalStateException error. > > Please report any bugs you find, or performance degradation. Thanks! > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Felipe Barriga RichardsUser #238135 counter.li.org Licentiate on Computer Science UTFSM [http://www.utfsm.cl] Informatics Engineering StudentUTFSM [http://www.utfsm.cl] Santiago, ChilePhone: +56 9 78057086 http://blog.felipebarriga.cl MSN:m...@felipebarriga.cl ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 08:55 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > IMHO "cpu draining" and "10 years" are kind of incompatible concepts! > > Lol, true :b. Nevertheless, I, for one, want Freenet to work on any > computer, even old ones, not only on the latest quantum computers. > I think that cpu is not a parameter to take care when looking to support javascript. Freenet itself use huge amounts of cpu... What about of allow only some functions of javascript ? (I know that you can obfuscate everything but there is always a way to filter that shit). Why don't make a requirements list to see what javascript functionalities are useful and see what functions must be avoided for security's sake? Also is always good to have a test suite to check if the browser doesn't have holes... The last thing is that I remember that java applets can be used with security profiles. There is no option to disallow almost everything dangerous and see what can be allowed safely (and see if they are useful..). The main advantages is that you can have 'search engines' and some database tools embedded on freesites using compressing techniques and some cool visual effects :P (the most close to flash and even can use something like nasa world wind: http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/java/demos/index_applet_text_and_links.html). Regards, -- Felipe Barriga RichardsUser #238135 counter.li.org Licentiate on Computer Science UTFSM [http://www.utfsm.cl] Informatics Engineering StudentUTFSM [http://www.utfsm.cl] Santiago, ChilePhone: +56 9 78057086 http://blog.felipebarriga.cl MSN:m...@felipebarriga.cl ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
