Re: [freenet-support] A beginner's analysis of Freenet's method of communication
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Daxter wrote: > From my understanding, there is a fundamental flaw in p2p technologies like > Freenet for those that want to deploy in highly-censored countries. That is, > it's too obvious. The censor doesn't have to know what's being transmitted, > only that /something/ is that's outside of their control. All they have to do > is disallow the ports on which the technology runs. Torrenters can at least > get around this by changing the port they're using; Freenet has no such > option. Every node chooses random ports for opennet and darknet during the installation. You can change them if you want. > From my understanding of internet communication protocols, the use of udp is > too obvious; it stands out like a sore thumb. Why not tunnel the connection > over tcp? Wouldn't that prevent potential censors from differentiating it > from the rest of transmitted data? As well, wouldn't it solve the closed > ports issue? No, it's not that easy. You clearly don't know what you're talking about. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?
It's a no for me. I'm not at all against JavaScript, and it's safe to enable it in incognito mode (or when using a separate Firefox profile for Freenet). The problem is that some users won't enable JS no matter what, and some others won't be able to (e.g. because they are using a non-conventional browser). And we shouldn't neglect FProxy's accessibility. _If_ there will be a way to use FProxy without JavaScript (and your message suggests the opposite), then I think everyone will agree with me that it's okay. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a browser > supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful (feel free to make > further comments). I will post a similar poll to FMS. I suggest somebody does > Frost, I personally don't use Frost. > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] How to force freenet to use a non-default java
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:00 AM, wrote: > If you're > launching with the shell script (is there a launcher shell script anymore?), > you could just change where it calls java and hardcode your own location as > above. Don't do that. It's stupid. Edit the "wrapper.java.command=java" line in the wrapper.conf file. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Out of memory, too many threads?
Try setting wrapper.java.maxmemory to at least 192 mbytes. Having 200-400 threads on busy nodes is however fairly common. On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Felix Schneider wrote: > Hello, > > today I have installed Freenet for the first time. It updated itself to > version 0.7.5 Build #1261 and everything seemed to work fine, but after a > few > minutes it crashed. The program runs on a Linux VPS with 512MB Ram and it > consumes > too much memory. When it starts, the memory usage displayed by "free" > increases by about 180MB, and before it crashes it consumes more than 400MB. > > I suspect it has something to do with the high number of threads the > program produces. In wrapper.log I found a dump of 196 threads when the > the JVM was terminated because of an OutOfMemoryError. Can that be normal? > > Many threads are "RequestSender for UID"-threads. This is one of them: > > "RequestSender for UID 4172439298440835119 on 26688(114)" daemon prio=10 > tid=0x61bea000 nid=0x7424 in Object.wait() [0x4ae68000] > java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x2aaab0c47770> (a freenet.io.comm.MessageFilter) > at freenet.io.comm.MessageCore.waitFor(MessageCore.java:464) > - locked <0x2aaab0c47770> (a freenet.io.comm.MessageFilter) > at freenet.node.RequestSender.realRun(RequestSender.java:627) > at freenet.node.RequestSender.run(RequestSender.java:194) > at > freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:228) > at freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:101) > > Is there anything I can do? In wrapper.conf I have already changed > the following lines: > > wrapper.java.maxmemory=80 > wrapper.java.additional.4=-XX:MaxPermSize=32 > > But it doesn't help. I have also tried to limit memory usage with ulimit: > ulimit -d 5; ulimit -m 5; ulimit -s 64 > No effect. Now I am at a loss. > > Felix > > > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Fproxy: Annoying floating status block at the bottom
div#statusbar-container {
display: none !important;
}
That's it.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:53 PM, 3BUIb3S50i <3buib3s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I second that:
>
> benja...@y7xehigmglivncq-a8spyu0yo-xrni3lcjhb8tceaxi wrote :
>> m...@1krwrbvk--oxqzzcbkkde7c2xjzubsw13c-mos7as6m a scris:
>>> How the hell can we remove this floating block? It annoys me, especially
>>> when I
>>> use my smartphone to browse freenet. No web interface theme seems to
>>> change that
>>> behaviour. I want to revert it to how it was on 1254
>>>
>>> Hints? css?
>> I also noticed today that this blocks occupies the bottom of the screen
>> (it is not drawn _below_ the page, but _over_ it). Not a real problem
>> if you have a large screen, but obviously a major issue on a phone.
>
> * Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1257 build01257
> * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
> Web interface theme: clean-static
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet
On 5/29/09, user1 wrote: > On Friday 29 May 2009 12:50:28 am Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Thursday 28 May 2009 22:29:49 user1 wrote: >> > > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > > > What OS do you use for Freenet? >> > >> > ubuntu 8.04 i586 desktop >> > >> > > > What is your current datastore size set to? >> > >> > 20 GB >> > >> > > > What is your output bandwidth limit set to? >> > >> > 50 KiB >> > >> > > > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? >> > >> > in 856 KiB/s >> > >> > out 90 KiB/s >> >> Eh? The output limit is set to 50KB/sec and you get 90KB/sec? > > Sorry, the 90 KB/sec I measured some time ago on my broadband connection > when > I uploaded some files to my ordinary homepage, I am not sure about how to > measure what actual bandwidth usage I typical get in my freenet? > Well, you can post your average up/down speed, like (those are my values) : # Input Rate: 26.9 KiB/sec (of 380 KiB) # Output Rate: 42.3 KiB/sec (of 95.0 KiB) # Total Input: 1.44 GiB (33.7 KiB/sec) # Total Output: 2.45 GiB (57.5 KiB/sec) >> >> > Note: >> > >> > I have been running Freenet on a fit-pc the last aprox 3-4 months as a >> > dedicated Freenet server only. >> > >> > I have a test running in crontab in order to avoid Freenet stopping from >> > time to time, and it works - I have not touched the fit-pc for several >> > months, just checked on the network cable and the adsl modem, that it is >> > constantly running (blinking control lamps). >> > >> > I am using another pc with ubuntu 9.04 as my working computer, so the >> > bandwith speed is really divided between the two computers. >> > >> > Fit-pc is far to slow to use for anything other than as a mini server. > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet
On 5/6/09, Matthew Toseland wrote: > What OS do you use for Freenet? > FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE > What is your current datastore size set to? > 300 GiB > What is your output bandwidth limit set to? > 100 KiB/s > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? > ~50 KiB/s > This will help us to make decisions about new performance features ... >
Re: [freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet
On 5/6/09, Matthew Toseland wrote: > What OS do you use for Freenet? > FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE > What is your current datastore size set to? > 300 GiB > What is your output bandwidth limit set to? > 100 KiB/s > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? > ~50 KiB/s > This will help us to make decisions about new performance features ... > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Donators list
Hello, I suggest we make a donators list a bit like this : http://www.emule-project.net/home/perl/general.cgi?l=1&rm=donations That would actually help the project, because donators won't have the feeling that they spent their money into void... And this period is quite critical about money.
[freenet-support] Donators list
Hello, I suggest we make a donators list a bit like this : http://www.emule-project.net/home/perl/general.cgi?l=1&rm=donations That would actually help the project, because donators won't have the feeling that they spent their money into void... And this period is quite critical about money. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
