[freenet-support] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
After running Freenet for a while (Actually only 2 weeks this time), I sometimes get the exclamation icon in the tray. The last thing in freenet.log is: Exception in thread "YThread-2184" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Aug 29, 2005 9:42:23 AM (freenet.node.Node, YThread-1994): Error while receiving message freenet.message.DataRequest at 129ca93 DataRequest @freenet.MuxConnectionHandler at cde9f2 @ 589d1a2250c8f962 in state freenet.node.states.FNP.NewDataRequest at 2e780f @ 589d1a2250c8f962: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Aug 29, 2005 9:42:34 AM (freenet.node.NodeReference, YThread-2191): t.getAddress(83.134.35.24:3681) took 3078 Exception in thread "YThread-2185" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Scrolling up, I notice several other errors at the end of the log. I still have Freenet running to possibly assist any debugging that would need to be done. The About dialog shows: Version 0.5.2.8 -- Andy -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
[freenet-support] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
After running Freenet for a while (Actually only 2 weeks this time), I sometimes get the exclamation icon in the tray. The last thing in freenet.log is: Exception in thread "YThread-2184" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Aug 29, 2005 9:42:23 AM (freenet.node.Node, YThread-1994): Error while receiving message [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 589d1a2250c8f962 in state [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 589d1a2250c8f962: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Aug 29, 2005 9:42:34 AM (freenet.node.NodeReference, YThread-2191): t.getAddress(83.134.35.24:3681) took 3078 Exception in thread "YThread-2185" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Scrolling up, I notice several other errors at the end of the log. I still have Freenet running to possibly assist any debugging that would need to be done. The About dialog shows: Version 0.5.2.8 -- Andy -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Active transfers too high
My node often overloads with too many transfers. You will see that I have 467 active transfers transmitting. **Connections [Switch to peers mode]** Wed Dec 29 10:03:30 PST 2004 [More details] Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 70 (12/58/100) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 467 (462/5) Data waiting to be transferred 47 KiB Total amount of data transferred2,002 MiB **Enviroment** Architecture and Operating System Architecturei386 Available processors1 Operating SystemLinux OS Version 2.6.5-7.111.5-default Java Virtual Machine JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM NameJava HotSpot(TM) Server VM JVM Version 1.5.0-b64 Memory Allocation Maximum memory the JVM will allocate259,264 KiB Memory currently allocated by the JVM 259,264 KiB Memory in use 221,159,704 Bytes Estimated memory used by logger None Unused allocated memory 44,326,632 Bytes Data Store Maximum size117,187,500 KiB Used space 24,037,700 KiB Free space 93,149,800 KiB Percent used20 Total keys 91753 Space used by temp files966,116 KiB Maximum space for temp files40,000,001,192 Bytes **General Information** Version Information Node Version 0.5 Protocol Version STABLE-1.51 Build Number 5100 CVS Revision 1.90.2.50.2.128 Uptime 1 day 3 hours 57 minutes Load Current routingTime 0ms Current messageSendTimeRequest 0ms Pooled threads running jobs 14 (7%) Pooled threads which are idle 15 Current upstream bandwidth usage 12783 bytes/second (104%) Reason for QueryRejecting requests: Estimated load (130%) > overloadHigh (125%)Estimated load (130%) > overloadHigh (125%) It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes 130% Current estimated load for rate limiting 133.3% [QueryRejecting all incoming requests!] Reason for load: Load due to thread limit = 7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 129.8% because outputBytes(765706) > limit (589824.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (12288) * 60 Load due to CPU usage = 133.3% = 100% / 0.75 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 1.8% because: 4727.252702849095 req/hr * 0.00277850822403 (pTransfer) * 268259.0 bytes = 3523504 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 2949120 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = 194641920 bytes/hr target Load due to expected outbound transfers: 0.1% because: 69.17398158133034 req/hr * 0.0010(999 0s, 1 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 268259.0 bytes = 18556 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxOutputBytes/minute = 516095 * 60 = 30965759 bytes/hr target Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load): 0.729 Current estimated requests per hour: 4417.545876413522 Current global quota (requests per hour): 2235.1086113701913 Current global quota limit from bandwidth (requests per hour): 164903.3210442147 Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute: 1595458 Current outgoing request rate 4727.252702849095 Current probability of a request succeeding by routing 0.7% Current probability of an inbound request causing a transfer outwards 0.1% Current target (best case single node) probability of a request succeeding 3.7% **Node Status Info** Uptime: 1 day, 4 hours, 0 minutes Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 11 (5.5%) [QueryRejecting all incoming requests!] Pooled threads which are idle: 18 It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load for rate limiting: 127.4%. Load due to thread limit = 5.5% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 127.4% because outputBytes(751185) > limit (589824.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (12288) * 60 Load due to CPU usage = 102.7% = 77% / 0.75 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 1.8% because: 4727.252702849095 req/hr * 0.00277850822403 (pTransfer) * 268290.0 bytes = 3523911 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 2949120 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = 194641920 bytes/hr target Load due to expected outbound transfers: 0.1% because: 63.31118607638463 req/hr * 0.0010(999 0s, 1 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 268290.0 bytes = 16985 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxOutputB
[freenet-support] Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files
My Java version java -version java version "1.4.1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01, mixed mode) I'm running SuSE 8.2 and I have 1.3GB of memory and I'm not running out of memory. uname -a Linux X 2.4.20-4GB-athlon #1 Tue Aug 10 11:17:52 UTC 2004 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux I'm using 384MB of memory for Freenet nice -n 10 -- java -server -Xmx384m $JAVA_ARGS freenet.node.Main "$@" & This is what the connections page show before the failure Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 117 (64/53/200) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 71 (44/27) Data waiting to be transferred 2,242 Bytes Total amount of data transferred6,658 MiB I'm getting this error after a few days of running. Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files, LSL.processConnections failin g java.io.IOException: Too many open files at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.jav a:134) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelecto rLoop.java:107) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java :846) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:149) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536) java.lang.Exception at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java :847) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:149) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536) Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files, LSL.processConnections failin g java.io.IOException: Too many open files at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.jav a:134) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelecto rLoop.java:107) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java :846) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:149) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536) java.lang.Exception at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java :847) at freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:149) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5088 - New Build 5089 Doesn't Show On FProxy Main Page
Since the 5089 announcement, I've been checking the FProxy main page for an indication that 5089 is available, but it doesn't show that it is available. I have been able to upgrade to 5089, but I'm concerned that there are nodes out there that won't know that it's time to upgrade. How is the FProxy main page made aware up a new version? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Weird Error
I've found that Freenet is a great tool for stress testing my system. You might want to run memtest on your box to see if you have a bad stick of memory. http://www.memtest.org/ http://www.memtest86.com/ Shoey Fighter wrote: Hello. I have recently installed Slackware 10.0 (java 1.4.2) and the latest stable build of Freenet. It worked seemingly fine for a few days, but then after letting it go by itself for a while I noticed my router wasn't showing much activity. I logged in via SSH, only to find that the service was no longer going. Confused, I started it again, and this time left the console window open to see if anything would be dumped. Eventually, the following message was dumped. (The only settings I changed in my configuration are allowedhosts=all computers on my network, maxconnections=150, ipaddress=mine, logfile=error, datastoresize=5000M). Now it takes about half of an hour (or less) for this error to come up. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can also include my configuration or any other info you might need. Thanks, ShoeyFighter Message: == Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x4031DF3A Function=(null)+0x4031DF3A Library=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible reason and solutions. Current Java thread: at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x45e88ee8> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1001) - locked <0x45e88ee8> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1054) at freenet.Core.join(Core.java:539) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:1016) Dynamic libraries: 08048000-0804e000 r-xp 03:02 33051 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java 0804e000-0804f000 rw-p 5000 03:02 33051 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/bin/java 4000-40014000 r-xp 03:02 12031 /lib/ld-2.3.2.so 40014000-40015000 rw-p 00013000 03:02 12031 /lib/ld-2.3.2.so 40016000-4001e000 r-xp 03:02 33532 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/native_threads /libhpi.so 4001e000-4001f000 rw-p 7000 03:02 33532 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/native_threads /libhpi.so 4001f000-40029000 r-xp 03:02 12071 /lib/libnss_compat-2.3.2.so 40029000-4002a000 rw-p 9000 03:02 12071 /lib/libnss_compat-2.3.2.so 4002c000-4003a000 r-xp 03:02 12078 /lib/libpthread-0.10.so 4003a000-4003b000 rw-p e000 03:02 12078 /lib/libpthread-0.10.so 4007d000-4007f000 r-xp 03:02 12067 /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so 4007f000-4008 rw-p 1000 03:02 12067 /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so 4008-401a8000 r-xp 03:02 12065 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so 401a8000-401ac000 rw-p 00128000 03:02 12065 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so 401b-405ab000 r-xp 03:02 33536 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm. so 405ab000-405c6000 rw-p 003fa000 03:02 33536 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm. so 405d9000-405eb000 r-xp 03:02 12070 /lib/libnsl-2.3.2.so 405eb000-405ec000 rw-p 00011000 03:02 12070 /lib/libnsl-2.3.2.so 405ee000-4060f000 r-xp 03:02 12068 /lib/libm-2.3.2.so 4060f000-4061 rw-p 0002 03:02 12068 /lib/libm-2.3.2.so 4061-40614000 rw-s 03:02 191373 /tmp/hsperfdata_root/1286 40614000-40624000 r-xp 03:02 33525 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so 40624000-40626000 rw-p f000 03:02 33525 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so 40626000-40646000 r-xp 03:02 33540 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so 40646000-40648000 rw-p 0001f000 03:02 33540 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so 40648000-4065c000 r-xp 03:02 33530 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so 4065c000-4065f000 rw-p 00013000 03:02 33530 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so 4065f000-41fff000 r--s 03:02 33646 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/rt.jar 42049000-4205f000 r--s 03:02 33605 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/sunrsasign.jar 4205f000-4213a000 r--s 03:02 33582 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/jsse.jar 4213a000-4214b000 r--s 03:02 33652 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/jce.jar 4214b000-426a4000 r--s 03:02 33644 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/charsets.jar 4474c000-4474f000 r--s 03:02 33516 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/ext/dnsns.jar 5080e000-5083a000 r--p 03:02 62976 /usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_CTYPE 5083a000-50856000 r--s 03:02 33517 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/ext/sunjce_provider .jar 50856000-50863000 r--s 03:02 33518 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/ext/ldapsec.jar 50863000-5091f000 r--s 03:02 33519 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/lib/ext/localedata.jar 5091f0
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet freezes internet connection
Thanks for the timely example. Not to be too argumentative, but shouldn't 100 connections be the default for most users, and if your system can handle more, then you can increase it? Kevin Steen wrote: On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 14:34, Manfred Huber wrote: Hello, I'm experiencing the following problem with Freenet: After some uptime, Freenet usually freezes my internet connection. Neither Freenet nor other applications send or receive any data anymore. This is often caused by your router or DSL modem being unable to handle sufficient simultaneous connections. Freenet uses a lot more TCP connections than most other software. Try adding the line: maxNodeConnections=100 to your freenet.conf (or freenet.ini) file and restart freenet. Decrease the number until you stop experiencing 'connection freezing' problems. -Kevin ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RNFs
That was helpful - thanks. Sorry to belabor the issue, but I still wonder if 100 is a reasonable number of connections, why would the default be 200? Shouldn't the default be 100? Kevin Steen wrote: All the config options and their code-specified default values can be found on the web interface: http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/documentation/cli If you don't use the Windows graphical configuration tool, I'd suggest deleting all the default entries in the config file and using a file with only the required lines in it ([Freenet node], ipAddress, listenPort, outputBandwidthLimit, storeSize). This makes it easier to review your config changes whenever you upgrade freenet. -Kevin On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 15:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, that worked. Would you happen to know the min/max for the entries that have a numeric value? Salah Coronya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. Toad wrote: No, it's 200. It used to be 512. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Back up you old configuration file, (optionally, but recommended also delete the original) and use java -jar freenet.jar --config to regenerate it. It'll generate a new config file with all the defaults (be sure to chose the the same listenPort and datastore size as before). (If you have customer settings in you old freenet.conf file that aren't the default, you'll need to re-add them) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA27znhctESbvQ8ZwRAoYbAJ43mxON7NCbH3WapM91k4QVrbuCnQCfSkiS u7PDlyB4kut58Ty2/H69bV4= =XCHq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RNFs
Thanks, that worked. Would you happen to know the min/max for the entries that have a numeric value? Salah Coronya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. Toad wrote: No, it's 200. It used to be 512. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Back up you old configuration file, (optionally, but recommended also delete the original) and use java -jar freenet.jar --config to regenerate it. It'll generate a new config file with all the defaults (be sure to chose the the same listenPort and datastore size as before). (If you have customer settings in you old freenet.conf file that aren't the default, you'll need to re-add them) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA27znhctESbvQ8ZwRAoYbAJ43mxON7NCbH3WapM91k4QVrbuCnQCfSkiS u7PDlyB4kut58Ty2/H69bV4= =XCHq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RNFs
Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. Toad wrote: No, it's 200. It used to be 512. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RNFs
Toad wrote: OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+ connections... If 100 is a reasonable number, then why is the default in the .conf file maxNodeConnections=512? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but each node connection takes up memory. As more connections are established, more memory is used until the node runs out of memory. Then the user has to restart their node to get the memory usage back to a reasonable level. Why not set the default to something reasonable, like 100 or less? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall
> I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a > software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want > to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...] What, a linux/unix box is *not* a software firewall? :) -- 5:45PM up 132 days, 3 hrs, 1 user, load averages: 0.15, 0.21, 0.24 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites
> First they came for the child porn sites ... > http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html > Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml > > Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, > so what should we do to prevent them from getting on the blacklists? The only way to surely prevent governments (whether the brithsh or the chinese or whichever else) from blocking freenet would probably be to give up development, and that really isn't an . I think it might be a good idea to not start mirroring the blocked content on Freenet merely to prove a point, though. -- 7:21PM up 124 days, 4:36, 1 user, load averages: 0.18, 0.20, 0.18 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] SYNs and SMURFs
Thanks. I have a SMC router that does have a tough time keeping up with Freenet. On a side note, I've found another use for Freenet as a system stress test. Unlike most applications, with Freenet you can really see a differences when you change your system configuration. If you have bad memory, Freenet will find it. If you have slow disk access, Freenet will really show you how slow it is. That new 2.6Ghz processor, Freenet will eat it up and ask for dessert. If your router is crap, Freenet will zero in on that weak spot. p.s. Sorry for the double post. I'll blame that on my router too. Salah Coronya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Hayter wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the "offending" IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses was fixed being that it was defined in the .conf file. Excuse my display of ignorance, but could someone please explain why the far ends port would need to change? Example Time: 05/31/2004, 04:21:52 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 1905 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:25:38 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 2600 Etc. Most likely this is an attempt by a Freenet node on 133.205.255.225 to connect to your Freenet external port, which is fixed, but is being prevented by your firewall. It tries again and chooses the next available source port. It has to use a new source port so it can tell the difference between the present connection and previous ones, should a packet return. The return packet will be from your Freenet fixed port, and to the arbitrary source port on the remote machine, 133.205.255.225. This is normal. Can you tell your firewall to ignore connections to your Freenet port? I think it may well be identifying Freenet packets as smurf attacks - what does anyone else think? If this is from a SOHO broadband router - especially a D-Link router, they should likely be disregarded, as the DoS detection in there doesn't usually work and it KNOWN to be broken in D-Link's firmware. There was a version of Freenet, 5023 IIRC, that accidently DID launch a sort of "syn flood" as it would try to reconnect relentlessly. In general, most SOHO router simply cannot handle the kind of traffic Freenet generates, and it confuses it with a DoS attack. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAu7YxhctESbvQ8ZwRAlhbAJ9Xn5orQIPwNhtdaONP5Ha7vHuNnACfSODp 2eiFYi1hJm8YNcVQSuVA+5o= =okvI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] SYNs and SMURFs
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the "offending" IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses was static being that it was defined in the .conf file. Excuse my display of ignorance, but could someone please explain why the far end port would need to change? Example Time: 05/31/2004, 04:21:52 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 1905 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:25:38 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 2600 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:29:24 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 3259 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:33:18 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 3844 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:37:06 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 4412 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:41:33 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] SYNs and SMURFs
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the "offending" IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses was fixed being that it was defined in the .conf file. Excuse my display of ignorance, but could someone please explain why the far ends port would need to change? Example Time: 05/31/2004, 04:21:52 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 1905 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:25:38 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 2600 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:29:24 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 3259 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:33:18 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 3844 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:37:06 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 4412 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:41:33 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Stable - Unstable COnnection Disparity
Ignore this message, it is a dupe. . wrote: I've noticed that the stable build does not open as many connections at the unstable build. When I start the stable build, it will make 3 or 4 connections at first and then just sit there. Slowly it will build more connections. When I launch the unstable build, it will immediately have 20 or more connections open. What could be the problem? Stable 5082 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)13 (0/13/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)18 (18/0) Data waiting to be transferred942 Bytes Total amount of data transferred143 MiB Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) <= limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. Unstable 60106 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)34 (0/34/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)152 (152/0) Data waiting to be transferred18 KiB Total amount of data transferredNone Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) <= limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
Thanks for the response. I had closed the port on my firewall since I mistakenly thought that with bidi I wouldn't need to keep it open. I'll open the port, and see what that does. Someone wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Bidi means that both outgoing and incoming connections will be used for routing. It doesn't help against nodes that don't accept incoming conns. To route to those nodes your node has to wait till they make a connection to you (provided that your node is able to accept incoming connections). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Someone wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. My guess is that many stable nodes are behind NATs and or firewalls, that are not set up right (i.e. the node port isn't forwarded or is blocked for incoming conns.). This may not be such an big issue on unstable as the ppl using unstable are more experienced when it comes to setting up their system the right way. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. Stable Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 7 (0/7/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 39 (29/10) Data waiting to be transferred 4,945 Bytes Total amount of data transferred310 MiB Uptime: 0 days, 16 hours, 44 minutes Current routingTime: 19ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 16 (13.3%) Pooled threads which are idle: 24 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 22.4%. Load due to thread limit = 13.3% Load due to routingTime = 1.9% = 19ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 28.5% = 285ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 22.4% because outputBytes(188378) <= limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 2.6% because: 2172.0 req/hr * 0.0021451008122710495 (pTransfer) * 390533.0 bytes = 1819555 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 13.3%. Unstable Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 52 (0/52/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 273 (266/7) Data waiting to be transferred 45 KiB Total amount of data transferredNone Uptime: 0 days, 16 hours, 38 minutes Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 29 (24.2%) Pooled threads which are idle: 4 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 154.3%. Load due to thread limit = 23.3% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 154.3% = 1543ms / 1000ms > overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) <= limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 12.4% because: 1878.0 req/hr * 0.01203536640608 (pTransfer) * 391115.0 bytes = 8840144 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 27.5%. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Unable to establish loopback connection
Hi, > >I am running newer JVM builds just fine (Windows XP).. I would rather > >say that Sun ought to adjust their code so that it works similary on > >different platforms/OS version. > > > I have Windows 2000 and the same problem (no loopback connection). > Tried Java 1.4.0: same error. > Tried Java 1.3.1: same error. > I didn't found 1.4.0-b92, so didn't test it yet. 1.4.0-b92 is the version you get when you download the 1.4.0 jre. FWIW, I found that merely installing an older java version won't work; you have to de-install all newer versions as well so the older jre will actually be the one that's used. Maybe that's why it didn't work when you tried 1.4.0 and 1.3.1. > Ehm maybe is a good idea to fix the Freenet code to work > on 1.4.x too instead of force to use an odd obsoleted Java > runtime version just to run freenet correctly?... I think so, too. Changes in Java *are* a reality, and Sun is not gonna undo them just for us. I also think that this should be documented in the FAQ on the freenet website. *hint, hint* -- 10:20PM up 12 days, 1:20, 2 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.18, 0.16 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenetproject@gl00on.net: [freenet-support] Unable to establish loopback connection]
Hi everyone, the following problem (which I reported earlier) continues to persist in the latest stable build. Any ideas on what might go wrong here and how to fix it would be appreciated. Attempting to start up freenet yields the following errors in the logfile: 22.11.2003 18:23:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting node Could not initialize network I/O system! Exiting java.io.IOException: Unable to establish loopback connection at sun.nio.ch.PipeImpl$Initializer.run(Unknown Source) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.PipeImpl.(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorProviderImpl.openPipe(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.Pipe.open(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorProvider.openSelector(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.Selector.open(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:111) at freenet.transport.ThrottledSelectorLoop.(ThrottledSelectorLoop.java:72) at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.(ReadSelectorLoop.java:73) at freenet.transport.tcpConnection.startSelectorLoops(tcpConnection.java:83) at freenet.node.Main.startNode(Main.java:1384) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:1004) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect at sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.SocketChannel.open(Unknown Source) ... 14 more The system is Windows XP SP1 with Sun's Java 1.4.2-b28. No part of Freenet's default configuration was changed except for datastore size and location. -- 6:24PM up 4 days, 21:25, 1 user, load averages: 0.30, 0.29, 0.21 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support - End forwarded message - -- 10:16PM up 8 days, 1:17, 2 users, load averages: 0.46, 0.26, 0.19 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Unable to establish loopback connection
Hi everyone, it's been a while since I used freenet, but I decided to install it again. However, I'm experiencing a problem now: after installing the latest (stable) build and attempting to start up the node, Freenet reports an error, and I get the following messages in my logfile: 22.11.2003 18:23:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting node Could not initialize network I/O system! Exiting java.io.IOException: Unable to establish loopback connection at sun.nio.ch.PipeImpl$Initializer.run(Unknown Source) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.PipeImpl.(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorProviderImpl.openPipe(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.Pipe.open(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.(Unknown Source) at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorProvider.openSelector(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.Selector.open(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:111) at freenet.transport.ThrottledSelectorLoop.(ThrottledSelectorLoop.java:72) at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.(ReadSelectorLoop.java:73) at freenet.transport.tcpConnection.startSelectorLoops(tcpConnection.java:83) at freenet.node.Main.startNode(Main.java:1384) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:1004) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect at sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(Unknown Source) at java.nio.channels.SocketChannel.open(Unknown Source) ... 14 more The system is Windows XP SP1 with Sun's Java 1.4.2-b28. Any ideas? -- 6:24PM up 4 days, 21:25, 1 user, load averages: 0.30, 0.29, 0.21 Every non-empty totally disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
