[freenet-support] "BitTorrent"

2007-03-16 Thread inverse
et branch with the option to disable key expiration and to stop storing keys when the datastore is full. sorry for the dumb request.. bye Inverse

Re: [freenet-support] "BitTorrent"

2007-03-16 Thread inverse
et branch with the option to disable key expiration and to stop storing keys when the datastore is full. sorry for the dumb request.. bye Inverse ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread inverse
Matthew Toseland wrote: > It's unnecessary anyway because it only applies to TCP. It does however > tell us something very interesting and useful: The firewall is stateless !! heh, it would be damn expensive to do that in a stateful way. let's see: >1. Timing. >2. Packet size. >3. It's not a kno

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread inverse
Matthew Toseland wrote: It's unnecessary anyway because it only applies to TCP. It does however tell us something very interesting and useful: The firewall is stateless !! heh, it would be damn expensive to do that in a stateful way. let's see: 1. Timing. 2. Packet size. 3. It's not a known

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread inverse
urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: > Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was > shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I > don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for > freenetbut it might be worth looking in to. it's possible to do it,

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-31 Thread inverse
David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > Communication between 0.7 nodes doesn't have to exchange public keys, > those are already known as they are contained in the node reference. nice! I definitely need to install 0.7 and capture some packets for testing

[freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread inverse
Matthew Toseland wrote: > Well on the most trivial level, 0.5 doesn't work in china. > yo, beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread inverse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for freenetbut it might be worth looking in to. it's possible to do it, but only

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread inverse
David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: Communication between 0.7 nodes doesn't have to exchange public keys, those are already known as they are contained in the node reference. nice! I definitely need to install 0.7 and capture some packets for testing ___ Sup

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread inverse
Matthew Toseland wrote: Well on the most trivial level, 0.5 doesn't work in china. yo, beyond harvesting the connected IP addresses to raid their owner's homes, one big concern with encrypted protocols is that they can be filtered out by application-level scanning firewalls. I think this i

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread inverse
nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote: > Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will > not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME > people, I don't have a hell > I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them d

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread inverse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME people, I don't have a hell I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them designed to run on ve

Re: [freenet-support] datastore out of control

2002-12-22 Thread inverse
5tucatz elPunishar wrote: is there anything i can do ? i already tried deleting the datastore.. doesn't help. amazing. Looks like your HD got datastore-cancer. It's gonna explode, no matter what you can do. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PRO

Re: [freenet-support] KLEZ Virus Spam Worm

2002-11-04 Thread inverse
root wrote: Your computer is infected with the KLEZ worm. Please see I'm so happy when I read such lines. I use Linux. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] Fw: LoveGangs relations to see !

2002-11-04 Thread inverse
Moro Beatrice wrote: Moro Beatrice? Buy yourself a better antivirus software. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] my mp3's

2002-10-30 Thread inverse
Dave Hooper wrote: If you had read the documentation you would know that a Freenet datastore is not the same as a directory full of mp3s. Freenet will create its OWN files in the data store. To do this it will delete the contents of the data store first. so this brings in the next question.

Re: [freenet-support] 请教:

2002-10-11 Thread inverse
MA wrote: > ÄúºÃ£º > ÖйúÈË£¿ ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support