At 02.45 11/02/03 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:07, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> Build 611? Are you sure about that? I have made contact with
>> (unstable) nodes with build numbers as high as 663.
>>
>> Are you also seeing your problem with the stable builds?
>
>Sorry for the typo... th
Since 13 january I am not receiving devl maillist.
Chat/web/clinets/tech are so rare that I cannot
say if I still receive it or not.
support works.
There is some good guy that can post the present
list situation: live, dead, zombie ?
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] accept posts but never
resend it.
At 02.25 07/02/03 +, you wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:43:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>=20
>> It would be nice that during a FEC download, aborting
>> the healing phase automatically save the file.
>>=20
>> Now if you abort the healing the download is lost.
>
>The healing phase
At 18.46 06/02/03 +, you wrote:
> Re [freenet-support] Re [Free4.ems[Free4.ems <0880.0002>>
>
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva:
>>=20
>> > >> is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a
>> > >> slow system; the memory
At 19.34 05/02/03 -0500, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe
>> compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from
>> the point of view of free software and from the security.
>
>What exactly do you mean by "Ka
It would be nice that during a FEC download, aborting
the healing phase automatically save the file.
Now if you abort the healing the download is lost.
JM2C. Marco
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+
* the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit
At 01.57 05/02/03 +, you wrote:
>> is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a
>> slow system; the memory profile and resource use of kaffe
>> is far better respect sun jre.
>> Take care of this compatibility; IMHO is more important
>> then that the mean Freenet developer think
At 00.57 03/02/03 +, you wrote:
> Re [freenet-support] freesite .emsfreesite .ems <0880.0002>>
>
>Personally I have never used Frost mainly because it uses Swing, which
I'm using FIW, a swing application, with Kaffe 1.0.7, with only some
warning messages in console
>will probably never be
At 19.57 28/01/03 +, you wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:17:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>=20
>> During the attempt of retrieving FEC files inserted
>> with 549 & FIW 0.04b, ( I cannot retrieve any block
>> not even if the block is in the local datastore),
>> I found a lot of th
During the attempt of retrieving FEC files inserted
with 549 & FIW 0.04b, ( I cannot retrieve any block
not even if the block is in the local datastore),
I found a lot of those messages in console
[root@tatooine root]# cat x
PARANOID CHK CHECK FAILED!
expected: freenet:CHK@uqcAfmIICJpGVgLKC
Im' inserting a freesite with files > 1 mb
using 549 & FIW 0.04b
All site insert OK, and can be retrieved, but when I try to retrieve
a FEC file, it give me all gray an red cross,
and is not able to retrieve even a single block.
This happen also if I attempt to retrieve from the node
I used
I need to disable the anonimity filter in dev branch, but
the setting
# Disables anonymity threatening servlets and infolets
%publicNode=false
in the last line of .conf has no visible effect with
both true & false values (yes I removed the %)
Someone can help ?
Thx a lot. Marco
--
+
At 19.26 13/01/03 +0100, you wrote:
>Have a look at the fproxy tab of the configurator...
I'm from the Linux side, no tab at all
and no java compiler in place too,
just plain C .
Ciao. Marco
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
From build 649 all site I access (including
TFE ang many others) are reduced to plaint
text withount any image or link.
There is some setting to do in freenet.conf to
configure/disable filtering ?
Thx. Marco
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+
* the Free
Till 8 GMT 2002 01 08, I'm unable to
fetch TFE & CRUFT from freenet.
I'm using 537, 539, 541 & 641 on 5
nodes.
Only FF is ok.
Other sites seems to be still there, but how retrieve it if
TFE is not working ?
I bet that most of freenetters have no link
to freesites, but only to TFE.
Maybe
At 22.26 05/01/03 +, you wrote:
>> btw my ./freenet/freenet/store_*/temp dir is empty, and I do not regularl=
>y=20
>> delete the files manually.
>Not surprising. It is cleaned out on node startup.
It is not so simple; all 4 nodes I run (539 to 629) had 100Mb or more
in temp dir that never go
At 02.00 31/12/02 +0100, you wrote:
>>>I've proven that data store overrun causes insertion tools like FIW to
>>>fail. The symptom is that the program stops midway through its
>>>insertion sequence and sits idle.
>>>
>>>I figured this out from looking at my datastore usage. It should be
>>>1Gig m
17 matches
Mail list logo
