On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type:
"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
not before 1.0.
0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote:
>
> Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
>
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
>
> Until Freenet 0.7 has
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
as the preferred download.
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
Until Freenet 0.7
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Disposition: inline
--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type:
Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download
page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the
preferred download.
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated in
