[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:06:24 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > > > >

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-11 Thread Juiceman
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:06:24 Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman ?wrote: >> >

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:06:24 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-11 Thread Juiceman
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:06:24 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman  

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > > wrote: > >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: > >>> Matthew Toseland wrote: > >>> > This is the downside of

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > > > wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna have > > to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work largely > > funded by Google's $18K. > > I think that using a

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Juiceman
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: >> Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna > have >> > to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work

[freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna have to revert it. Which means throwing away more than 6 months work largely funded by Google's $18K. I think that using a database is

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Juiceman
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread problem, we're gonna have to revert it. Which means throwing away more than

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Victor Denisov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 One other thing, for both you and Juiceman: How's the CPU usage? Given how much RAM you have I would expect node.db4o to be cached in memory (how big is it?). But doing a read through the OS to the OS disk cache may cost a lot of CPU (context

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: This is the downside of db4o. If it is a widespread

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: Matthew