On Monday 27 October 2008 21.42.35 Luke771 wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:28:33 +0100
>
> bqz69 wrote:
> > Now my question, is it necessary to have any ports open in order for
> > freenet to work best?
>
> No, it's not -necessary- in the sense that your node will work anyway, but
> it's a good
bqz69 a ?crit :
> I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
> running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
> opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
>
> I am using "Firestarter" as my "firewall" as I find it easy to use, only.
>
>
I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
I am using "Firestarter" as my "firewall" as I find it easy to use, only.
Now my question, is it
I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
I am using Firestarter as my firewall as I find it easy to use, only.
Now my question, is it necessary
bqz69 a écrit :
I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also
running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet
opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
I am using Firestarter as my firewall as I find it easy to use, only.
Now my
On Monday 27 October 2008 21.42.35 Luke771 wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:28:33 +0100
bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question, is it necessary to have any ports open in order for
freenet to work best?
No, it's not -necessary- in the sense that your node will work anyway, but
it's a
