[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Matthew Toseland 
You don't need 5107 if your node already works. It fixed a problem with
starting up. If you do want a new version, download the jar. Apache is
stable, and way past "1.0"; Freenet isn't. Apache logs are designed to
help people analyse the usage of their sites, not to help debug apache -
at the normal website level of logging anyway. Freenet logs are designed
to help people debug freenet.

On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
> >> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> >> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> >> seems pretty "raw", though.
> >
> >For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
> 
> For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
> etc. are pretty much "human readable" at first glance.
> 
> However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:
> 
> EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
> noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
> May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
> thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
> freenet.node.QueueManager$NodeElement at ccff6b: timeToSendWindow=0,
> ph=freenet.PeerHandler at 103fb85 (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
> af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
> presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
> 3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
> freenet.node.QueueManager$QueueElement at 8b7c44: id=acaca359c0720e83,
> expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
> request=freenet.message.DataRequest at a34aea DataRequest @null @
> acaca359c0720e83,
> callback=freenet.node.states.request.SendFinished at 
> 94f131@acaca359c0720e83,true@
> -1:1148032573105:false:null:freenet.message.DataRequest at a34aea
> DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
> routes=freenet.node.rt.NGRouting at 66dbc0
> (f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
> EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
> noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times
> 
> but that's just one "line" of it...
> 
> 
> By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
> success. At first I tried the "update snapshot", but the download
> speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
> the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
> to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
> files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
> web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

Re: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Matthew Toseland 
You don't need 5107 if your node already works. It fixed a problem with
starting up. If you do want a new version, download the jar. Apache is
stable, and way past "1.0"; Freenet isn't. Apache logs are designed to
help people analyse the usage of their sites, not to help debug apache -
at the normal website level of logging anyway. Freenet logs are designed
to help people debug freenet.

On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
> >> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> >> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> >> seems pretty "raw", though.
> >
> >For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
> 
> For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
> etc. are pretty much "human readable" at first glance.
> 
> However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:
> 
> EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
> noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
> May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
> thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: timeToSendWindow=0,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
> af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
> presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
> 3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=acaca359c0720e83,
> expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @
> acaca359c0720e83,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@acaca359c0720e83,true@
> -1:1148032573105:false:null:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
> EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
> noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times
> 
> but that's just one "line" of it...
> 
> 
> By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
> success. At first I tried the "update snapshot", but the download
> speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
> the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
> to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
> files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
> web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Level 13 
> > One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> > "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> > seems pretty "raw", though.
>
> For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...

For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
etc. are pretty much "human readable" at first glance.

However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:

EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
freenet.node.QueueManager$NodeElement at ccff6b: timeToSendWindow=0,
ph=freenet.PeerHandler at 103fb85 (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
freenet.node.QueueManager$QueueElement at 8b7c44: id=acaca359c0720e83,
expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
request=freenet.message.DataRequest at a34aea DataRequest @null @
acaca359c0720e83,
callback=freenet.node.states.request.SendFinished at 
94f131@acaca359c0720e83,true@
-1:1148032573105:false:null:freenet.message.DataRequest at a34aea
DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
routes=freenet.node.rt.NGRouting at 66dbc0
(f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times

but that's just one "line" of it...


By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
success. At first I tried the "update snapshot", but the download
speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.

RE: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Level 13 

> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> seems pretty "raw", though.

For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...


For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
etc. are pretty much "human readable" at first glance.

However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:

EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: timeToSendWindow=0,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=acaca359c0720e83,
expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @
acaca359c0720e83,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@acaca359c0720e83,true@
-1:1148032573105:false:null:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times

but that's just one "line" of it...


By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
success. At first I tried the "update snapshot", but the download
speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Level 13 
In this section of FAQ
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
"node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
(where I used to have my IP, but now I have my DynDNS address) and
"listenPort=..." (with the port that was added after installing
Freenet; this port is also port-forwarded in my router/firewall).
Why the discrepancy -- is the FAQ for 0.7 already, or maybe for Linux version?

One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
"humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
seems pretty "raw", though.

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:26:15PM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
> In this section of FAQ
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
> it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
> "node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
> these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
> (where I used to have my IP, but now I have my DynDNS address) and
> "listenPort=..." (with the port that was added after installing
> Freenet; this port is also port-forwarded in my router/firewall).
> Why the discrepancy -- is the FAQ for 0.7 already, or maybe for Linux 
> version?

Yes, it's ipAddress and listenPort on 0.5.
> 
> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> seems pretty "raw", though.

For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

Re: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:26:15PM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
> In this section of FAQ
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
> it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
> "node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
> these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
> (where I used to have my IP, but now I have my DynDNS address) and
> "listenPort=..." (with the port that was added after installing
> Freenet; this port is also port-forwarded in my router/firewall).
> Why the discrepancy -- is the FAQ for 0.7 already, or maybe for Linux 
> version?

Yes, it's ipAddress and listenPort on 0.5.
> 
> One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
> "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
> seems pretty "raw", though.

For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Level 13 

In this section of FAQ
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
"node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have
these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..."
(where I used to have my IP, but now I have my DynDNS address) and
"listenPort=..." (with the port that was added after installing
Freenet; this port is also port-forwarded in my router/firewall).
Why the discrepancy -- is the FAQ for 0.7 already, or maybe for Linux version?

One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
"humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log
seems pretty "raw", though.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]