On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:02:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 18.46 06/02/03 +, you wrote:
Re [freenet-support] Re [Free4.emsfile://D:\Mail\Attach\Re [freenet-support] Re
[Free4.ems 0880.0002
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva:
is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a
slow system; the memory profile and resource use of kaffe
is far better respect sun jre.
Take care of this compatibility; IMHO is
At 18.46 06/02/03 +, you wrote:
Re [freenet-support] Re [Free4.emsfile://D:\Mail\Attach\Re [freenet-support] Re
[Free4.ems 0880.0002
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva:
=20
is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is really impossible to find a trade off
between new developement and the existing
features of Kaffe ?
Mostly a matter of Kaffe implementing such an ancient and limited version of
Java that modern Java programmers can't deal
