On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 01:48:36 +, Toad wrote:
>> >Heh. That's called an RNF. It stands for "Route Not Found". And no, you
>> >don't need FUQID to download files from freenet
>> ...but it works much better than anything else I've tried. :-)
>
>I thought you didn't have it? :)
I had left the Mozil
> > Thanks for your answers, all in all I'm happy now with the performance
of
> > Freenet, I've given it 6GB to store data and it already uses 1.5GB.
>
> Woah. You're happy with the performance of freenet? This cannot happen,
> it doesn't make sense, it's against all Newsbyte's assertions, the sky
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +, Clueless wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:35:48 +, Toad wrote:
>
> >That has generally been true of freenet in the past, unfortunately. We
> >have made some progress, but nodes not working well for newbies is
> >expected.
>
> That's OK, as long as the n
Well, on my Mac OS X 10.3.6 800Mhz iBook server with 640MB RAM, Apple's
1.4.1 JVM and 10GB Freenet store over a NAT AirPort Extreme fixed IP RCN
cable connection, Freenet is OK a lot of the time. Loads up to a 100
connections are normal. Generally, I do restart Freenet and wait only a few
minutes i
Quoting Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:33:28AM +, Clueless wrote:
> > Now it's better, although as I write this, all I get is "The network is
> > busy, please try again later" while trying to download FUQID, a program one
> > seems to absolutely need to download from Fr
Quoting Clueless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for your answers, all in all I'm happy now with the performance of
> Freenet, I've given it 6GB to store data and it already uses 1.5GB.
This is heartening to hear. I really wonder how often we gain a user who makes
it past the initial (slow) ramp-u
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:35:48 +, Toad wrote:
>That has generally been true of freenet in the past, unfortunately. We
>have made some progress, but nodes not working well for newbies is
>expected.
That's OK, as long as the newbie knows what to expect. I think the site says
something about "a few
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:54:45AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> ~From your posts I guess you haven't been running a stable node for some
> time,
> then installed a new one and tried to insert your flog the same day. Then it
> doesn't suprise me that it took quite some time. Let your node run a week
>
English -- corrupted by living in a few too many
> different sites in United States of America.
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: BlueStar88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 12/1/2004 1:21:06 PM
> > Subject: [freenet
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:27:55AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> "Newsbyte: Go back to i2p if you like it that much, or try to give some
> real critics instead of just posting polemic and sarcasmic whine messages."
>
> That is a stupid remark, and you know it. For someone (no pun intended) that
> says
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:33:28AM +, Clueless wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>
> >Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
> >normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through
> >multiple nodes, with maybe even so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Newsbyte schrieb:
| I've made the comparison between I2P and freenet, and they both have value,
| as I said in the past. I agree that the level of whining has increased, but
| that's mostly due to the fact that being diplomatic and giving alternatives
ML = Mailing List
PM = Private Message
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:27:05 -0500, Nicholas Sturm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No flames here, but I did not understand the message and I don't
> have the advantage of analyzing on the basis of other language
> forms. I suspect it was the symbols that left
ROTECTED]>
> Date: 12/1/2004 5:54:36 PM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Is it always this slow?/kicked out
of
>
> "I was just going to say, that flamewars on project support
> mailing-lists are not professional and should better be done by
> private mail."
>
; From: BlueStar88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12/1/2004 2:23:56 PM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Is it always this slow?/kicked out
of
>
> Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> > I need a translator for this. I don't claim to speak, rea
Why is it only the "clueless" new user who's talking about Freenet on this
Freenet mailing list right now?
-todd
Quoting Clueless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>
> >Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
> >normal Websi
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
>normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through
>multiple nodes, with maybe even some ISDN or 56K users in the chain.
I guess it depends on how long y
"Newsbyte: Go back to i2p if you like it that much, or try to give some
real critics instead of just posting polemic and sarcasmic whine messages."
That is a stupid remark, and you know it. For someone (no pun intended) that
says I should say valuable things, you don't set the good example.
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phillip Hutchings schrieb:
| On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:19:59 +0100, Newsbyte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [cut for brevity]
|
| In my time watching this list, which is well over a year now, I don't
| actually recall you making a valid contribution to the pr
"I was just going to say, that flamewars on project support
mailing-lists are not professional and should better be done by
private mail."
Maybe. But that's difficult to do if you are asked to respond but told your
email is going directly going to the bin.
Besides, when talking about non-professi
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
I need a translator for this. I don't claim to speak, read or write
anything but American English -- corrupted by living in a few too many
different sites in United States of America.
Do that in error free german and we can discuss about.
Not all people on your computer are n
> Date: 12/1/2004 1:21:06 PM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Is it always this slow?/kicked out
of
>
> Hummm... some guys talked 'bout putting things in the correct ML..
> does that all really fit into 'support' ?
>
> Just a question.
>
> May yo
Hummm... some guys talked 'bout putting things in the correct ML..
does that all really fit into 'support' ?
Just a question.
May you should do that by PM. I don't like that feelings here, even
i'm not an official member with a freenet.org address. Doing such
things in public is not professiona
23 matches
Mail list logo
