Thanks. I have a SMC router that does have a tough time keeping up with
Freenet.
On a side note, I've found another use for Freenet as a system stress
test. Unlike most applications, with Freenet you can really see a
differences when you change your system configuration. If you have bad
mem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Hayter wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>
>> For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
>> attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
>> fault of my firewall or
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the
"offending" IP increments. I th
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the
"offending" IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses
was static being th
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the
"offending" IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses
was fixed being tha
