Re: [freenet-support] reducing cpu load on a low end cpu system
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:48:15PM - or thereabouts, Dave Hooper wrote: > > I have a linuxbox running freenet and frost, which is frustrating, > > because it slows down everything and freenet's java is consuming 90 - 99 > > % of cpu time. > > Type "man nice" and see what it says. > what do you intend with that? if freenet is consuming so much cpu time, it _needs_ it, right? If I down nice freenet's pid, it will loose connections, which I might need ;) cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | DEJA VU: French., already seen; unoriginal; trite. <-> 2.4.19-cr | Psychol., The illusion of having previously experienced on a | something actually being encountered for the first time. i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] reducing cpu load on a low end cpu system
> I have a linuxbox running freenet and frost, which is frustrating, > because it slows down everything and freenet's java is consuming 90 - 99 > % of cpu time. Type "man nice" and see what it says. d ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] reducing cpu load on a low end cpu system
Hi, what settings are best to the freenet.conf to reduce cpu load? I have a linuxbox running freenet and frost, which is frustrating, because it slows down everything and freenet's java is consuming 90 - 99 % of cpu time. For example, can I set storeCipherNames=none to reduce calculating keys, or does the cpu has to reencipher them, when they are requested? cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | Not drinking, chasing women, or doing drugs won't make you 2.4.19-cr | live longer -- it just seems that way. on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
