On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Toad wrote:
[ranty stuff edited out]
> > My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
> > stable builds have been really good already ..
> They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
> unstable, because it's what gets
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:44:08 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's what gets hacked on mostly...
The huge memory leak is fixed, and transfer speeds has gone up :)
Regarding RNFs .. well, maybe - I ha
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
> >
> >Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
> >report.
>
> My exp
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 04:02:35AM -0800, miguel wrote:
> duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here:
> (note: order does not indicate weight nor priority)
> 1. Get a female to work on this thing.
> 2. At least run permanent node.
> 3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the fr
duh, guys, I'm a newbie +- so I can only make observations so here:
(note: order does not indicate weight nor priority)
1. Get a female to work on this thing.
2. At least run permanent node.
3. DSL ain't no faster when it hits the freenet bogs.
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumb
