RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windowsperspective.
Ah, okay. Yeah, kinda n00b here. Now that you mention it, it didn't really seem to make a difference. Musta been an older faq. Don > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Oliveri > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a > windowsperspective. > > > Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in > CVS has all > traces of the Transient property removed. > > So you won't notice much of a difference using this property > on stable > (build 5091). > > On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote: > > Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit > once or twice. > > Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, > overnet, > > etc... It's easy enough to fix anway. > > > > I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I > got was to > > manually change the config file to have > "TransientNode=False" in it. > > Apparently Freenet won't integrate into the network as well > if you're > > set to transient. In the process of testing it now. I'll > know better > > in a day or so. > > > > Don > > -- > Jay Oliveri > GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 > FCPTools Maintainer > www.sf.net/users/joliveri > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.su> pport > > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.
Transient isn't that relevant anymore; the current build in CVS has all traces of the Transient property removed. So you won't notice much of a difference using this property on stable (build 5091). On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:05 am, Don Gregory wrote: > Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice. > Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet, > etc... It's easy enough to fix anway. > > I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to > manually change the config file to have "TransientNode=False" in it. > Apparently Freenet won't integrate into the network as well if you're > set to transient. In the process of testing it now. I'll know better > in a day or so. > > Don -- Jay Oliveri GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 FCPTools Maintainer www.sf.net/users/joliveri ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a windows perspective.
Well, I HAVE bumped into the half-open connection limit once or twice. Mostly it's an issue for people using P2P clients, edonkey, overnet, etc... It's easy enough to fix anway. I did some reading on the subject, and the recommendation I got was to manually change the config file to have "TransientNode=False" in it. Apparently Freenet won't integrate into the network as well if you're set to transient. In the process of testing it now. I'll know better in a day or so. Don > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Michael DeLisle > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet: from a > windows perspective. > > > I recently installed a new node from scratch on a > Windows XP SP2 box, > and here are my observations. > > While there's lots of talk about SP2 limiting TCP > connections, I > haven't see any real issues with it. > > On the negative side, freenet-java-webinstall.exe is > configured to > install Sun JRE 1.4.1, when I believe it should install 1.4.2. > > After 5 hours of uptime I only have 72 open > connections. This was a > problem I experienced on my linux based node too; either the > seednodes.ref file is inadequate (weighing in at 26mB!) or > Freenet 5091 > isn't aggressive enough about meeting maxNodeConnections. > > I would also like to point out that I'm currently only > using ~50% of > my upstream bandwidth, based on frequent observation of the "General > Information" page. Perhaps Freenet should be more apt to take > advantage of newbie nodes? > > If there's any other information that would be of > assistance, please > let me know. > > --mikeDOTd > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.su> pport > > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
yeah... castrated.. lol - Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > actually, it comes to me as attachments. anf the attachments are 1 txt and 1 > DAT That's how PGP signed e-mails look. Your e-mail client is Outlook Express -- it can't handle MIME properly. (Or your MTA has been broken beyond repair.) > most likely because of your signed e-mails :P Quite. > this one came normal. :P You mean abnormal. Or castrated. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg01687/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
actually, it comes to me as attachments. anf the attachments are 1 txt and 1 DAT most likely because of your signed e-mails :P this one came normal. :P - Original Message - From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply > to this thread. thanks. Your server is fscked. My client does not send HTML attachments, it uses the standard for sending signed mail. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:45:42PM -0800, Mike wrote: > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply > to this thread. thanks. Your server is fscked. My client does not send HTML attachments, it uses the standard for sending signed mail. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
It's that darn outlook express/signed email thing again, Here's what matthew said... What do you mean by the main portal? The Freedom Engine? This contains lots of slow-loading images. Stop it loading first, and then other links will probably work. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:support-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Mike > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet > > > sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my > server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can > you re reply > to this thread. thanks. > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:37 PM > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet > > > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
sorry, matthew, but your replies come to me as garbeled attachments. my server stips attachments, as a virus security precaution. can you re reply to this thread. thanks. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
my uniformed guess is that since all routing of data is done totally peer to peer, the network is going to be pretty flakey for the next few hours while all these new slashdot nodes come online. its just a matter of dillution... suddenly there is a massive flood of nodes that dont know how to route to anything (because they are new to the networka) ... so until they start building up there routing tables... its gonna ge a bit rough. rest assured, yesterday freent was running great :) -joschi ___ Josh .. Yoshi .. Joschi .. http://mp3.com/vitriolix Boom wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal with ;) At any rate, I am running as a 24/7 node with port 2 as my fproxy port. I can't connect to *any* sites other than the main portal linked to on the front page. Even when setting the hops as high as 50 or so, i get absolutely no response from any sites! I definitely have no local network issues, no blocked ports or conflicting apps... Grrr.. Any ideas? Maybe it's because I'm in the UK? There can't be too many nodes locally yet.. Thanks in advance David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 294) Beta iQA/AwUBPb2fKyOn+ry/opL7EQJY+ACfUsyjqaLPG8r/tMR0BXpwMnihiikAnjDk kwGDmecbqrL+75RPaJn6sMKp =AqM7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
boom, try this... right click on the rabbit, and select configure and select the Fproxy, for giggles. set the port to 8081 to test the connectivity. I was using the default port and i had the same issue. changed it to 8081 (it is the default for the 0.4 release) and now i get many sites. :P laters. - Original Message - From: "Boom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there :) Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal with ;) At any rate, I am running as a 24/7 node with port 2 as my fproxy port. I can't connect to *any* sites other than the main portal linked to on the front page. Even when setting the hops as high as 50 or so, i get absolutely no response from any sites! I definitely have no local network issues, no blocked ports or conflicting apps... Grrr.. Any ideas? Maybe it's because I'm in the UK? There can't be too many nodes locally yet.. Thanks in advance David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 294) Beta iQA/AwUBPb2fKyOn+ry/opL7EQJY+ACfUsyjqaLPG8r/tMR0BXpwMnihiikAnjDk kwGDmecbqrL+75RPaJn6sMKp =AqM7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with freenet
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:33:52PM -, Boom wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there :) > > Nice software.. I totally think this is an excellent idea for protecting peoples >freedom of speech and expression, if too radical for many people from the US to deal >with ;) At any rate, I am running as a 24/7 node with port 2 as my fproxy port. I >can't connect to *any* sites other than the main portal linked to on the front page. >Even when setting the hops as high as 50 or so, i get absolutely no response from any >sites! I definitely have no local network issues, no blocked ports or conflicting >apps... Grrr.. Any ideas? Maybe it's because I'm in the UK? There can't be too many >nodes locally yet.. What do you mean by the main portal? The Freedom Engine? This contains lots of slow-loading images. Stop it loading first, and then other links will probably work. > > Thanks in advance > >David > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 294) Beta > > iQA/AwUBPb2fKyOn+ry/opL7EQJY+ACfUsyjqaLPG8r/tMR0BXpwMnihiikAnjDk > kwGDmecbqrL+75RPaJn6sMKp > =AqM7 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ msg01666/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with Freenet under Mac OS X 10.1
On Saturday, October 20, 2001, at 05:52 PM, Zachary Copley wrote: > I'm having terrible trouble gettting Freenet 0.3.9.2 to work with Mac OS > X 10.1. The node starts up, but then I can't retrieve any keys. Well, since the latest release of Freenet doesn't work with Mac OS X 10.1 (even thought it's a great Java platform), does anyone know whether the latest snaphot will work? Thanks, Zach ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
