On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 01:48:36 +, Toad wrote:
>> >Heh. That's called an RNF. It stands for "Route Not Found". And no, you
>> >don't need FUQID to download files from freenet
>> ...but it works much better than anything else I've tried. :-)
>
>I thought you didn't have it? :)
I had left the Mozil
> > Thanks for your answers, all in all I'm happy now with the performance
of
> > Freenet, I've given it 6GB to store data and it already uses 1.5GB.
>
> Woah. You're happy with the performance of freenet? This cannot happen,
> it doesn't make sense, it's against all Newsbyte's assertions, the sky
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +, Clueless wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:35:48 +, Toad wrote:
>
> >That has generally been true of freenet in the past, unfortunately. We
> >have made some progress, but nodes not working well for newbies is
> >expected.
>
> That's OK, as long as the n
Well, on my Mac OS X 10.3.6 800Mhz iBook server with 640MB RAM, Apple's
1.4.1 JVM and 10GB Freenet store over a NAT AirPort Extreme fixed IP RCN
cable connection, Freenet is OK a lot of the time. Loads up to a 100
connections are normal. Generally, I do restart Freenet and wait only a few
minutes i
Quoting Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:33:28AM +, Clueless wrote:
> > Now it's better, although as I write this, all I get is "The network is
> > busy, please try again later" while trying to download FUQID, a program one
> > seems to absolutely need to download from Fr
Quoting Clueless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for your answers, all in all I'm happy now with the performance of
> Freenet, I've given it 6GB to store data and it already uses 1.5GB.
This is heartening to hear. I really wonder how often we gain a user who makes
it past the initial (slow) ramp-u
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:35:48 +, Toad wrote:
>That has generally been true of freenet in the past, unfortunately. We
>have made some progress, but nodes not working well for newbies is
>expected.
That's OK, as long as the newbie knows what to expect. I think the site says
something about "a few
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:54:45AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> ~From your posts I guess you haven't been running a stable node for some
> time,
> then installed a new one and tried to insert your flog the same day. Then it
> doesn't suprise me that it took quite some time. Let your node run a week
>
"Some guys talked about putting things [discussions?] onto the correct
mailing lists.. does that [discussion] really fit into [this list]?
Just a question.
Maybe you should do [this flame-war or debate] by private messages. I
don't like the feelings here, even if I'm not an official member with a
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:27:55AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> "Newsbyte: Go back to i2p if you like it that much, or try to give some
> real critics instead of just posting polemic and sarcasmic whine messages."
>
> That is a stupid remark, and you know it. For someone (no pun intended) that
> says
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:33:28AM +, Clueless wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>
> >Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
> >normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through
> >multiple nodes, with maybe even so
ML = Mailing List
PM = Private Message
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:27:05 -0500, Nicholas Sturm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No flames here, but I did not understand the message and I don't
> have the advantage of analyzing on the basis of other language
> forms. I suspect it was the symbols that left
No flames here, but I did not understand the message and I don't
have the advantage of analyzing on the basis of other language
forms. I suspect it was the symbols that left me in no-get-it land.
> [Original Message]
> From: Newsbyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12/1/200
Thanks for your help. I assume that to mean you
did not have something important to say to anyone
except the person you were answering. I still need
a translator. I did not understand some of the
abbreviation, or that was my presumption. I do
read all message that look like they are using
Engli
Why is it only the "clueless" new user who's talking about Freenet on this
Freenet mailing list right now?
-todd
Quoting Clueless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>
> >Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
> >normal Websi
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
>Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
>normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through
>multiple nodes, with maybe even some ISDN or 56K users in the chain.
I guess it depends on how long y
I need a translator for this. I don't claim to speak, read or write
anything but American English -- corrupted by living in a few too many
different sites in United States of America.
> [Original Message]
> From: BlueStar88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12/1/2004 1:21:06
17 matches
Mail list logo
