Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but > > it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, > > What kind of errors ? > > > high CPU > > and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~

Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote: > Hi, > > at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but > it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU > and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading What CPU do you have? How muc

RE: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Niklas Bergh
> I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under > linux) dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. And is not available for windows yet :( I am running 1.4.2_03 and cannot say I am seeing any problems that are caused by the actual JVM version... /N _

Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-16 Thread Herve Lefebvre
> Hi, > > at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but > it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, What kind of errors ? > high CPU > and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading > other messages here I got the impression that the actual st