On 7/25/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> upnp is junk anyway. Whoever decided it was a good idea to let some
> application on your network dynamically open ports on your firewall
> needs to share some of what they were smoking.
>
> Ok, if it's not abused, it's better than having ne
On 7/25/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is nothing in the manual about setting up CARP so I have did a
Yeah, there's a lot that isn't in the manual...kinda pointless to
document something that keeps changing :)
> VIP using proxy ARP. I don't care which way it has to be setup,
On 7/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This package is no longer available via freebsd's ftp servers and
> we've never had a confirmation that it works so I am deactivating this
> package.
>
upnp is junk anyway. Whoever decided it was a good idea to let some
application on your n
Yeah, I played around with this package for a few hours and couldn't
convince myself that it actually did anything. Maybe someone else can
make sing and dance (well, at least make it sing so we can teach it
how to dance). Until then, it's gone.
--Bill
On 7/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED
This package is no longer available via freebsd's ftp servers and
we've never had a confirmation that it works so I am deactivating this
package.
Scott
On 7/25/05, Giorgio Ducci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the new WRAP version! I'm following your work very closely
> and it is great.
On 7/25/05, Xtian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill and Scott:
>
> Many thanks for the info and the field descriptions. Right, I was doing about
> 105KBps down (on my 1Mbps down, 384Kbps up DSL) which is everything, and then
> initiated an SSH session and latency was as high as ever. Then I loo
Thanks for the new WRAP version! I'm following your work very closely
and it is great. I'm testing all the feature (step by step) and I
found that 'upnp' does not install==>Downloading package configuration
file... done.
Saving updated package information... done.
Downloading upnp and its dependenc
Have been looking for a replacement to monitor our hosts bandwidth
behind our pfsense firewalls.
I was wondering if the pf filter mib with snmp would be
caperable of doing this from within the state table.
Does anyone have some good ideas for this. All the
information needs to come bac
Try the ez shaper wizard and do not over commit your real bandwidth
available. Over commiting the bandwidth values will have huge
consequences.
Scott
On 7/25/05, Xtian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill and Scott:
>
> Many thanks for the info and the field descriptions. Right, I was doing ab
Bill and Scott:
Many thanks for the info and the field descriptions. Right, I was doing about
105KBps down (on my 1Mbps down, 384Kbps up DSL) which is everything, and then
initiated an SSH session and latency was as high as ever. Then I looked in
the rules and saw nothing for SSH. So I assumed i
I will look into using the sysctl.conf infrastructure that we have.
I have a feeling that some of these values need to be passed from the
boot loader, however. We'll see.
Scott
On 7/25/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uhhh, what's that gonna do to the rest of us that don't use
David Strout ha scritto:
yes, It works :-)
but...
ssh doesn't work
with 0.70.x I wasn't able to restore a saved configuration
nat: outbound load balance, does it work?
regards
Everyone,
Has anyone tried the new 0.71.x WARP version on a
Soekris 4801 yet?
If so could you provide any findings
Everyone,
Has anyone tried the new 0.71.x WARP version on a
Soekris 4801 yet?
If so could you provide any findings / gotchas?
Regards,
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
I believe 5.4 requires the if_bridge patch.
Scott
On 7/25/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Thank you very much!
> And just for curiosity.. does FreeBSD 5.4 need it?
>
>
> On 7/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/25/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTE
...Thank you very much!
And just for curiosity.. does FreeBSD 5.4 need it?On 7/25/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> Hi to all.> I am working on a solution to change the bridge part of pfSense, to add the> ability of bridge toget
On 7/25/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all.
> I am working on a solution to change the bridge part of pfSense, to add the
> ability of bridge together LAN and WAN interface.
> To better understand the process, and also because I am very curious, I am
> trying to build "
Hi to all.
I am working on a solution to change the bridge part of pfSense, to add the ability of bridge together LAN and WAN interface.
To better understand the process, and also because I am very curious, I
am trying to build "from scratch": not all the pfSense system, but at
least the bridging
On 7/25/05, Christian Rohrmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't found that to be true. It doesn't create any rules for SSH.
> pfSense has a wide selection of games and P2P software that it will make
> rules and queues for, but not SSH, unless I overlooked something.
> Certainly trying to SSH
On 7/25/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this discussion is going on a bit. But I was wondering
> If we really think it is practical using the method we are trying.
>
> With a basic round robin configured on the firewall. The web servers can
> be configured to use there own sof
I have 2 boxes at home, both on carp. Works fine. You sure your
outbound rules are setup correctly?
Scott
On 7/25/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On version 0.70.8 I had sync working and backup lan operational when the
> master was down.
>
> On veriosn 0.71 the sync
On 7/25/05, Christian Rohrmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't found that to be true. It doesn't create any rules for SSH.
> pfSense has a wide selection of games and P2P software that it will make
> rules and queues for, but not SSH, unless I overlooked something.
> Certainly trying to SSH
Hi Bill,
I haven't found that to be true. It doesn't create any rules for SSH.
pfSense has a wide selection of games and P2P software that it will make
rules and queues for, but not SSH, unless I overlooked something.
Certainly trying to SSH whilst FTPing a large suffered from the same
massive la
On 7/25/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The virtual interface does not show up with statnad ifconfig on bsd??
> Sure someone else can tell you why.
Cause it's not an IP alias on an existing interface. Virtual IPs are
either just a proxy ARP or a CARP address. In the case of proxy A
Uhhh, what's that gonna do to the rest of us that don't use squid? Is
this going to make the kernel use more memory?
--Bill
On 7/24/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright, I'll recompile the kernel with:
>
> options MSGMNB=8192 # max # of bytes in a queue
>
Use the EZ-Shaper wizard. It will do exactly what you want.
--Bill
On 7/24/05, Xtian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have done my best to read the FAQs, documentation, and mailing list
> archives for both pfSense and Monowall, and have not found any information on
> this, hence I am a
On version 0.70.8 I had sync
working and backup lan
operational when the master was down.
On veriosn
0.71 the sync works great all the rules are being syncronised
and the backup becomes master in the status of carp but??
It does not seem to have a
route to the internet any more.
A tra
Yep it does normally.
After doing what you have done. Ie VIP proxy ARP 1 to 1 NAT
Have you made a rule to allow access to the host inside the 1 to 1 nat
Ie
Allow all source to destination 'local IP address' 'the port of your
choice'
This is different from linux in that you need to add the allow
The virtual interface does not show up with statnad ifconfig on bsd??
Sure someone else can tell you why.
If you have a rule to allow to the virtual interface on imcp and you get
a reply then where is the problem.???
I was under the understanding that when you use 1 to 1 nat you don't
need all th
I know this discussion is going on a bit. But I was wondering
If we really think it is practical using the method we are trying.
With a basic round robin configured on the firewall. The web servers can
be configured to use there own software to manage there own Virtual
ipaddresses.
That will allo
29 matches
Mail list logo
