Thanks Kevin I think you might be on to something, because when I pluged the WAN
cable from the pfSense box into the switch on the old router it got an IP right
away.
I didn't manage to get an IP from my ISP even after restarting the DSL modem, or
changing the MAC, so I just left the old router
uhhh broadcoms suck under FreeBSD also, well at least the GigE chipsets,
Intels are fine though
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 09:07 +0200, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa)
wrote:
I echo that ! I've used 3coms through the many generations on various
os's.. They even sucked hard under DOS(3c509) and even
Hello,
I have an issue. I want to allow itunes communication to passthrough my
gateway. I cannot figure out hoow to do this. I know itunes uses ports
3689/tcp and 5353/udp and multicast. I cannot figure out how to allow
these through and still maintain multicast. I can do it if it is just
go one
Lists wrote:
uhhh broadcoms suck under FreeBSD also, well at least the GigE chipsets,
I would have agreed with anything prior to 6.0, but ever since upgrading
my one PowerEdge 2550 with a bge gig card to 6.0, it's been rock solid.
On 5.4, it wasn't too horribly bad, but it would drop
I use WPA and it works great. There must be something else going on
with your configuration.Just try WPA and a basic Access Point
configuration.
On 11/15/05, Brad Gass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I've done some digging and have yet to come up with any answers in the
archives or
I have 3 wraps with cm9 and wpa running as Accesspoints without issues. One of
them was running with 0.84.6 with an uptime of 35 days without any problems
before I updated it today. However, I haven't tried clientmode yet.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich
WPA testing has mostly been done with AP config, as this is what most ppl
use. However it worked as a client last time I checked, but something might
be broken with it now. I'll retest this ASAP. I just need to find a second
client box to test with, I'll report back later.
To verify you setup you
Lists wrote:
yeah, do a tcp thruput test between two boxes and tell me if you get
more then 800mbs, then slap intel cards in the box and do it again, been
there done that granted its better then it was in 5.x but still nothing
close to what it should be for the bandwidth your giving up, let me
Hi All,
My pfsense devices won't do auto update, are there any known issues with
0.90?
Also, the snmp daemon on my 0.90 devices are reporting that their interfaces
are all down! I'm using carp, will this be causing it?
Thanks,
Adam.
Has anyone tried to use any of the Sangoma cards with pfsense?
Specifically, I'm interested in trying their T1 card:
http://www.sangoma.com/products/p_csu_cards.htm
Drivers:
ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/FreeBSD/
They might not support FreeBSD 6.x. They list 5.4 in May 2005 Release
notes.
See http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=684,0
Problem should be resolved now, let me know if you still have issues.
-lsf
-Original Message-
From: Espen Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15. november 2005 20:28
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] 0.92 WPA
I'm not sure, I have been trying to find this out myself.
If you test it, please let me know.
Also if anyone has tried AWM or Junghans with Freebsd6 please let me know.
I'm working on implementing asterisk in pfsense, to provide a full SMB all
in one system. I'm currently thinking of having a
Just wanted to report that after many miserable weeks/months of trying to
get PfSense to run in any sort of stable/production situation on 3 different
PC's, I finally bought a WRAP a few weeks ago and I couldn't be happier!
While on any of the three PC's my PfSense box would go down anywhere
Thanks for the info, but pfSense should run fine on other hardware than WRAPS
as well AND it actually DOES run stable on other hardware as well. The WRAP is
a very fine device, I agree, but if it comes to pushing larger loads you need
something with more power under the hood (a WRAP does 28+
14 matches
Mail list logo
