Re: [pfSense Support] Bridging 4 auto MDIX eth interfaces for LAN zone doesn't work correct

2009-01-14 Thread Dominik Schips
Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 14.01.2009, 00:09 -0500 schrieb Chris Buechler: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Dominik Schips domi...@s235.de wrote: Here is my output from ifconfig: The bridge looks fine. The interfaces that are plugged in are forwarding, the ones that don't have link are

Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Atom Motherboards or Similar Systems

2009-01-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:44:04PM -0500, Chuck Mariotti wrote: I just need dual network/LAN. I wish I had three. Two is not enough for carp+pfsync, non-transparent bridge without VLANs. I have been looking at Jetway and Intel boards. Do these have Intel GBit NICs? 2-3 of them? Any

RE: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Christopher Iarocci
I'm embarrassed to write this, and I'm having trouble finding someone to lend me a gun, but you were right. The PPTP server was enabled on my side causing the problem. Christopher Iarocci Network Solutions Manager Twin Forks Office Products 631-727-3354 -Original Message- From: Tim

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Glenn Kelley
Christopher - Thank you for the early morning laugh. If you were closer to New York like us - I am willing to bet the gun would be easier to find due to this cruddy market ;-) I have found most every problem I have had has been user error... PEBKAC is the motto of the day I guess problem

[pfSense Support] Intermediate CA issue

2009-01-14 Thread Atkins, Dwane P
Awhile we had an issue where we had to modify the system.inc so that we could add the line $lighty_config .= ssl.ca-file = \/path/to/my/cert/mycert.pem\\n\n; Did this get fixed in recent releases? If not, are there plans to make corrections? thank you, Dwane Dwane Atkins Senior

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Tim Nelson
No need for self-induced bodily harm... we've all been there. :-) The PPTP problem is one of those 'gotchas' when working with pfSense that we used to run into all the time. BUT, frankly we don't use PPTP anymore for many reasons and it hasn't been an issue for us. If you simply need to give

Re: [pfSense Support] Intermediate CA issue

2009-01-14 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Atkins, Dwane P atki...@uthscsa.edu wrote: Awhile we had an issue where we had to modify the system.inc so that we could add the line $lighty_config .= ssl.ca-file = \/path/to/my/cert/mycert.pem\\n\n; Did this get fixed in recent releases? If not, are there

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Atom Motherboards or Similar Systems

2009-01-14 Thread Chuck Mariotti
Thanks for the info... I will stay away from Jetway. Are there any limitations to what these ALIX boards can do or handle in terms of traffic? I'd like to do some load balancing, run SMTP spam filter and IDS on it. I have no need for wireless. Which board do you recommend? -Original

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Paul Mansfield
Tim Nelson wrote: If you simply need to give road warriors access to your network, *PLEASE* check out OpenVPN yes, what he said. we've got windows (XP, vista), linux and Mac users all on openVPN and it mainly just works. don't make life hard for yourself :-)

RE: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Christopher Iarocci
I'd love to use OpenVPN, but the end users have to set it up themselves, and honestly, it's not easy enough for an end user to do. Editing a text file with technical information is beyond most end users capability. If there was a point and click GUI made for it, that would be different. Getting

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Iarocci ciaro...@tfop.net wrote: I'd love to use OpenVPN, but the end users have to set it up themselves, and honestly, it's not easy enough for an end user to do. You can build an installer file that has no prompts for the user to click and auto

RE: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-14 Thread Christopher Iarocci
Now THAT is easy. That being said, I can't wait for 2.0 to come out. Christopher Iarocci Network Solutions Manager Twin Forks Office Products 631-727-3354 -Original Message- From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Buechler Sent: Wednesday, January 14,

Re: [pfSense Support] Bridging 4 auto MDIX eth interfaces for LAN zone doesn't work correct

2009-01-14 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Dominik Schips domi...@s235.de wrote: vr1 isn't working to update the IP. vr0 = LAN vr1 = LAN1 (bridged to LAN) I have this rule for LAN1 (vr1). * LAN net * * * * I also tried * LAN1 net* * *