Hi,
I have dual router configuration, 1 lan, 3 wan, 2 isp-s. port 25 is
forwarded to email server in lan network. Default route is wan1. When i
try to telnet from lan to wan2 port 25, i get no connection, but i can
ping wan2 from lan. Telnet to wan1 and wan2 from outside works perfectly.
What
Hey everyone!
I was curious if anyone had successfully gotten APCUPSD up and running on a
PFSense box? I'm running 1.2.3 (and it's awesome by the way :) ) The reason I
want to go with APCUPSD and not the NUT package is because my UPS is also
powering a couple of other devices and I have APCUP
Are you saying that once you rebooted, the shaper worked as expected with
the 200 kbit limit?
Regards,
-Jeppe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Abdulrehman wrote:
> I am experiencing the same issue at my side...i have 3mbit symmetric and i
> had set UP/Down to 200kbit...in the start every thing w
Chris, yes that helped out tremendously and made sense to me all at the same
time!
I added static routes for all of the subnets that the router does not sit on,
with their gateways being their router interface.
Thanks again so much for your help.
-Marty
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:curtisla
Slicing and dicing to get context:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26, mikel wrote:
> I think that contrackd doenst does this
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0600, Bill Marquette
> wrote:
>> All 255 protocols. If it's in state, it's sync'd.
At the expense of addressing a fallacy on the wrong lis
Yeah!!
This is a very good reason!!
I think that contrackd doenst does this
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0600, Bill Marquette
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, mikel wrote:
>>
>> I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend
> discuss
>> me that
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, mikel wrote:
>
> I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
> me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
>
> I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
> daemon, not kernel level.
>
> My que
Are all 3 of these network behind the LAN interface on PF or do they each
have their own interface. If they have their own interface, pfSense sees
the as connected routes and directs traffic accordingly, however, if they
are all connected via another router behind the pfsense LAN interface, then
y
Gary, thanks for the reply.
Riddle me this. I have three networks (10.x. 192.168.138.x, and 192.168.132.x)
all trying to see this pfsense box and presumable get out to the Internet. How
would the routing work in that scenario?
Thanks,
-M
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mai
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:26 PM, mikel wrote:
>
> I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
> me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
>
> I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
> daemon, not kernel level.
>
> My ques
I ask this question, because I am favour ogf *BSD, and one friend discuss
me that what pfsync+carp does, is possible with contrackd.
I have read that contrackd only syncs tcp states, and is a user space
daemon, not kernel level.
My question is, it can do all that pfsync?
If yo dont know
Marty Nelson wrote:
I know, I know stupid question.
Is the default gateway the WAN address? If not, where is it located?
Thanks,
-M
The default gateway is the default route for traffic on that network
segment to reach all remote network segments not otherwise specified in
I know, I know stupid question.
Is the default gateway the WAN address? If not, where is it located?
Thanks,
-M
agree, this is not a linux mailing list.
however, linux users might find the following script useful:
http://www.zaurus.org.uk/download/scripts/nf_conntrack
it gives you a useful overview of the (nat) states. I wrote it when I
couldn't find anything similar and was trying to work out how a
parti
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Larry Sampas wrote:
> Has anyone bridged interfaces in embedded pfSense? I was wondering if
> support for bridging is compiled in the kernel.
>
Yes.
> I am running an Alix 2d3 board, and I can't run snort locally. Being
> too cheap and lazy to purchase or build
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:30, apiase...@midatlanticbb.com
wrote:
> icmp 192.168.10.255:54864 <- 192.168.10.11 0:0
> icmp 192.168.10.11:54864 -> 192.168.10.255 0:0
> icmp 192.168.10.255:60489 <- 192.168.10.11 0:0
> icmp 192.168.10.11:60489 -> 192.168.10.255 0:0
> I've discovered that this devic
Has anyone bridged interfaces in embedded pfSense? I was wondering if
support for bridging is compiled in the kernel.
I am running an Alix 2d3 board, and I can't run snort locally. Being
too cheap and lazy to purchase or build a tap, I'd like to bridge the
external interface to the unused interfac
icmp
192.168.10.255:54864 <- 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:54864 -> 192.168.10.255
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.255:60489 <- 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:604
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:06, Chris Buechler wrote:
> For one, you're not likely to find any Linux users here, at least not any
> that are intimately familiar with Linux firewalls.
Preferring to hand-roll my own rule sets and knowing the iptables
packet stack nearly by heart, I'd say I am famili
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
> More tecnically reason?
>
> Referring to states, tracking, tcp/udp...
There's a reason you aren't getting the responses you want on the
OpenBSD list where you asked the exact same question and here. For
one, you're not likely to find any Lin
More tecnically reason?
Referring to states, tracking, tcp/udp...
Bill Marquette wrote:
Go troll elsewhere.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
Hello
Is pfsync better than contrackd?
Who cares, pfsense runs on FreeBSD where there be demons, not penguins.
In w
Go troll elsewhere.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is pfsync better than contrackd?
Who cares, pfsense runs on FreeBSD where there be demons, not penguins.
> In what aspects?
It runs on *BSD, not linux, so yes, infinitely better.
--Bill
Hello
Is pfsync better than contrackd?
In what aspects?
--
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.
I am experiencing the same issue at my side...i have 3mbit symmetric and i
had set UP/Down to 200kbit...in the start every thing was stopped...i used
tcpdump on my LAN side but my Pfsense was not listening to anything...then a
reboot fixed it but the problem mentioned by -Jeppe- remains same...i ha
24 matches
Mail list logo
