-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2005 15:49
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11q vlans
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i assumed he had all that correct, since he said
he
At 03:15 AM 9/30/2005, you wrote:
[alan walters] [alan walters]
Just looking at this I can only tag to a specific vlan on each port.
So port to is enabled for 802.11q on vlan 1-4 with vlan 1 as the tag but
it allows untagged traffic to transit.
Other ports have only onevlan on then and they are
Well, this is weird. I've got to believe it's a configuration
problem with your switch. If it weren't, I can't see how the packets
would exit the switch at all. BTW, my switch is such that each port
is associated with one and only one vlan, but I have to do this too:
1. put the pfsense
This might be off topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so
I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into
lan on pfsense.
Then the
At 05:28 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
This might be off
topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan –with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into lan on
Lan
|
|
Port2 on
switch-
port 4 on switch vlan 3--win XP
Is the switch port configured for tagging, or did you configure it to
allow vlans 1-4 to talk to port 2? The VLAN setup in pfSense utilises
802.1q tagging, enabling vlans on a port doesn't necessarily configure
that port for tagged frames.
--Bill
On 9/29/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:27 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Is the switch port configured for tagging, or
did you configure it to allow vlans 1-4 to talk
to port 2? The VLAN setup in pfSense utilises
802.1q tagging, enabling vlans on a port doesn't
necessarily configure that port for tagged
frames. --Bill On
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i assumed he had all that correct, since he said
he could see the traffic going into the pfsense
port. i was going to ask the same question,
myself. this has to be a config problem, as i'm using this exact same setup.
I agree, which is
