I agree completely.
What we were using it for is all our wired clients and wireless *were*
on the same internal lan. The captive portal was enabled on the LAN
interface. All wired clients had mac-bypass entries, and the wireless
clients had to get past the captive portal.
What I'm thinking is
I'm drafting a reply. Be done shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dressel [mailto:tjdres...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
, 2009 9:07 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question
Hi folks,
Just an update. I built a new machine from the ground up today. Took a
backup from the old machine, and just copied and pasted the 300+
mac-bypass entries into the new config file. Everything
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 00:10, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still interested though in anyone out there with large numbers of
mac-bypass entries. Any takers?
At the risk of redundancy, that was rather the point. Other than the
interface of your manually entering them (which is not
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime
: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime in with the precise ipfw limitation
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 22:06, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, I'd appreciate any feedback out there on installs with counts
on mac bypass entries topping a 1000 count. I am considering tying
together several of my networks and would like to know what the upper
end on the
Hi folks,
I've got a captive portal deployed on a simple LAN/WAN configured
current PFsense box.
All clients that I want to have transparent access to the internet
have a MAC bypass entry.
All other clients authenticate against the active portal.
The mac-bypass has over 300 entries in it.
I
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime in with the precise ipfw limitation, but
this is mostly going to be dependent on
I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on. We have a
rather large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works
fine. Its a dual opteron/4 gigs of ram. Probably overkill, so it
wont help you know what you need, but if your running 128 ram or even
256, its bare
Hi,
A question about the captive portal. I'm looking for a way to disallow
concurrent user logins. However, most customers will use MAC address
for authentication, so if I disallw concurrent user logins, they can
still access the 'net from the MAC address and give their
username/password
I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
come in on...)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
come in on...)
At 07:10 PM 8/24/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Aha, thanks. I was before, but I got bit by that bug you just fixed
in the vlan checking code. Haven't pulled down 0.80 yet. Thx...
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
