Chris,
Thanks for your reply, I found this out earlier today. Yes, all of the
gateways are outside of the firewall so when I changed the IP on my
laptop after getting the firewall upgraded it was able to get out with
no problem.
Again, thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.
Joe
Chris
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
> single bridge.
> For instance:
> 111.111.111.111/25 -> em0/bridge0/opt1 -> internal servers
> 222.222.222.222/25 -> em0/bridge0/opt1 -> internal se
Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
single bridge.
For instance:
111.111.111.111/25 -> em0/bridge0/opt1 -> internal servers
222.222.222.222/25 -> em0/bridge0/opt1 -> internal servers
I see a way to add a virtual IP in the Firewall sectio
Greetings list,
Another slightly unusual network setup I'd be really grateful for some advice
with:
ISP has provided 2 DSL connections with the same routed subnet - but not bonded
(routers on a.b.c.1 and a.b.c.2).
Is it possible to load balance between the 2 default gateways (.1 and .2) with
You do not need Advanced Outbound NAT.
In your firewall rules , on the LAN interface change the default rule
so that the gateway is your pool. This will load balance your traffic.
Take a look at http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing
- this is a recently updated doc and will h
Hi,
I have 3 WANS. Each has a static ip assigned by the ISP based on login. I
have the router/modems set to login and give each of my WAN interfaces an
IP. 192.168.2.10, 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.0.10. (I also DMZed those IPs in
the router/modems so that I can do NAT with pfsense) I setup a pool
On 1/31/06, H I L T O N R A L P H S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holger Bauer wrote:
> > You are talking about policy based routing. pfSense can do this kind of
> > routing. Configure the WAN interface with the PPPoE-settings and one of
> > your OPTx interfaces with the static settings of the oth
Holger Bauer wrote:
You are talking about policy based routing. pfSense can do this kind of
routing. Configure the WAN interface with the PPPoE-settings and one of your
OPTx interfaces with the static settings of the other line. Don't forget to
enter the gateway there.
Then check out your fire
I L T O N R A L P H S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2006 14:49
> An: support@pfsense.com
> Betreff: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs, different routes
> but not fail
> over?
>
>
> Hi guys
>
> Just recently subscribed (today).
>
> I&#
Hi guys
Just recently subscribed (today).
I'm from South Africa and I have a situation where the local DSL is not
that reliable so we need to install a diginet leased line as well.
The leased line will have a static IP address whilst the DSL will
connect via PPPoE and have a dynamic IP addre
Holger Bauer wrote:
using the same gateway for both wans won't work as you can't specify rules for
this I think. the rules are applied to a gateway and with both gateways the
same... :-/
you might have to come up with a workaround like having a nated router in front of one connection to use th
Technically, we do put the interface in the rule when it's
created. But I can guarantee we'll only snag the first one.
So, while you can enter the same IP multiple times in a pool
(artificially creating a ratio based round robin) I'd be willing to bet
that we don't correctly support this on one d
On 9/5/05, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> using the same gateway for both wans won't work as you can't specify rules
> for this I think. the rules are applied to a gateway and with both gateways
> the same... :-/
> you might have to come up with a workaround like having a nated router
way on one wan and put the pfsense in the
dmz of this router.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dave Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2005 22:54
An: Scott Ullrich
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple WANs
Scott Ullrich wrote
On 9/5/05, Dave Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea whether or not having the same (DHCP-assigned) "default"
> gateway IP on multiple WAN interfaces will cause a problem? In other
> words, my reading so far suggests that routing is done based on the
> destination gateway, not the interfac
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 9/5/05, Dave Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick question -- I'm looking at pfSense, and wondering if it's possible
to use two WAN interfaces which receive their IPs via DHCP, and also if
it's a problem if they share default gateways?
Long story short, I have two
On 9/5/05, Dave Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick question -- I'm looking at pfSense, and wondering if it's possible
> to use two WAN interfaces which receive their IPs via DHCP, and also if
> it's a problem if they share default gateways?
>
> Long story short, I have two connections to th
> Quick question -- I'm looking at pfSense, and wondering if it's possible
> to use two WAN interfaces which receive their IPs via DHCP, and also if
> it's a problem if they share default gateways?
>
> Long story short, I have two connections to the same ISP and would like to
> direct some traffic
Quick question -- I'm looking at pfSense, and wondering if it's possible
to use two WAN interfaces which receive their IPs via DHCP, and also if
it's a problem if they share default gateways?
Long story short, I have two connections to the same ISP and would like to
direct some traffic to one, and
19 matches
Mail list logo
