Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
Hi all, I'm currently migrating an existing Sun Netra T1 100 box
Next monday I will start testing the new enviroment on a new paralell
setup, I'm using 1.2.1 snaps, since 1.2 doesn't boots fine on Proliant
ML350G4, 1.2 show a very slow boot time specially
we have fairly moderate usage using 1.2-release full install on a
core2duo, using the intel e1000 nics on board tyan S5391 motherboard.
the numbers are:
memory: 10% (of 2GB)
CPU: 2% usage on average, typically 2% interrupt (peaking to about 5%),
0.5% system (peaking to 1%).
mbuf usage:
Paul Mansfield wrote:
CPU: 2% usage on average, typically 2% interrupt (peaking to about 5%),
0.5% system (peaking to 1%).
p.s. that's a core2duo 6600, 2.4GHz
(sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu')
-
To
Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
Hi all, I'm currently migrating an existing Sun Netra T1 100 box
what kind of switches are you using? if they're equally old, they could
also form a bottlenck on performance.
you might want to consider upgrading them too, to cisco 3560G or even
3560E if you
Hi all, I'm currently migrating an existing Sun Netra T1 100 box
running Solaris 8 and Checkpoint Firewall 1, wich has run for 9 years,
to a PFSense, on a HP Proliant ML350 G4 server with 2 GB Ram, a Xeon
Dual Core at 3GHz bus 800 MHz, three attached network, one at 1 GBps,
and 2 at 100 MBps, it
I think, 500k connections are quite possible (from anecdotal evidence posted
to this list). They will cost about 500 MB RAM.
It's also a question of how many packets per second you want to route.
Ditto (almost). 3-500k states is not really that high of a load, not
knowing your throughput or
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:11 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two suggestions: search the list archives and find the multitude of
answers to this question, and find out what your current PPS and
bandwidth throughput is. Unless you're actually pushing Gig-E speeds,
it's doubtful you'll even
You'll be happy with the ML350 - it's not even a fair comparison
against that Sun box.
Very much agree - even though not routing-specific, I have fond
memories of the disk throughput on the ML370-G3. I even put pfSense
on one at one point and ended up going back to a Dell 2550 because I
just
Well, my pps requirements are 500 kpps, we expect to improve to 400
MBps on our wan link, the other two attached networks, one fixed at
100 mbps, the other will have 1 Gbps link, three network cards, 1
PCI-X and two PCI cards, right now our main problem is the fact that
we receive many short
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my pps requirements are 500 kpps, we expect to improve to 400
In lab testing of FreeBSD 6.2, I ran out of horsepower on my two test
boxes (HP DL145G2 - dual core Opteron boxes) generating around 400k
pps
10 matches
Mail list logo
