Paul Mansfield wrote:
In fact, I was looking at a new Atom mobo a little earlier which is much
more power efficient:
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/D945GSEJT/sb/CS-030300.htm
the Poulsbo or US15W chipset also promises power savings, e.g.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
Paul Mansfield wrote:
In fact, I was looking at a new Atom mobo a little earlier which is much
more power efficient:
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/D945GSEJT/sb/CS-030300.htm
the Poulsbo or
David Burgess wrote:
With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX
and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices like these.
I think Intel are only just getting started with Atom - they've still
got a lot to in reducing the power of the support chipset!
In
- Paul Mansfield it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
David Burgess wrote:
With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for
ITX
and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices like
these.
I think Intel are only just getting started with Atom - they've still
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
David Burgess wrote:
With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX
and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices like these.
I think Intel are only just getting started
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
In regards to alternate arch's, wouldn't something like ARM or MIPS provider
better PPS rates than x86(_64)?
No difference due to the architecture. There are some higher end MIPS
platforms that are equivalent to big $
I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of
porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would
it be a complicated project?
With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX
and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of
porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would
it be a complicated project?
Yes, but not directly because of pfSense. The underlying
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of
porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would
it be a complicated
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
That's a good reason. What about using a NetBSD base? I suppose that
would be another big job?
More than you can imagine.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
That's a good reason. What about using a NetBSD base? I suppose that
would be another big job?
More than you can imagine.
I won't try then. Turns
11 matches
Mail list logo
