allowable protocol can be tcp/udp, and it add separate rules for tcp
and udp. cool. unfortunately, you then have to add one manually for
icmp assuming one wants to be able to ping outside hosts. how about
tcp/udp/icmp also/instead?
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: allowable protocol can be tcp/udp, and it add separate rules for tcp and udp.cool.unfortunately, you then have to add one manually for
icmpassuming one wants to be able to ping outside hosts.how about tcp/udp/icmp also/instead?
tcp and udp
At 10:49 AM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
allowable protocol can be tcp/udp, and it add separate rules for
tcp
and udp. cool. unfortunately, you then have to add one
manually for
icmp assuming one wants to be able to ping outside
hosts. how
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. the reason i bumped into this was looking at my ntop data, i noticed a
small amount of non-IP data going out the WAN port. no idea what - i have a
windows box (XP) but it should be doing NETBIOS over TCP (or whatever the
option
Are you bridging any interfaces with the wan interface?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] suggestion for LAN rule menu
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL
At 12:41 PM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
Are you bridging any interfaces with the wan interface?
nope.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] suggestion for LAN rule
Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
I'm not sure what the data is. I was monitoring WAN with ntop, and I
assumed it was my windows XP box. Maybe not? I don't see where ntop
calls out what the data was. Here's the screenshot:
much/most of it appears to be ARP traffic. i guess it's harmless to
