Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Mapping failure

2007-04-03 Thread Chris Buechler
Robert Goley wrote: I have not heard back on this issue. Is this broken? Was it broken on purpose? The destination port range option is now totally missing from the firewall screen. I am trying to add this to a LAN rule. I'm thoroughly confused, as I'm sure everyone else is as well whic

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Mapping failure

2007-04-03 Thread Robert Goley
I have not heard back on this issue. Is this broken? Was it broken on purpose? The destination port range option is now totally missing from the firewall screen. I am trying to add this to a LAN rule. Robert On Monday 02 April 2007 09:35, Robert Goley wrote: > The bug issue is a feature tha

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Mapping failure

2007-04-02 Thread Robert Goley
Sorry, This particular issue turned out to be a typo in the virtual IP address. It was trying to do right but of course would not work. As for why the WAN connection did not work correctly when I tested using the interface address, I am not sure. I deleted and recreated all rules and forward

RE: [pfSense Support] NAT Mapping failure

2007-03-29 Thread Holger Bauer
Please don't switch the topics of your mails concerning the same issue constantly. It's hard to follow/track a vonversation this way. Thank you. Holger > -Original Message- > From: Robert Goley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 2:42 AM > To: support@pfsense.com >